Written by a History & Politics Graduate and a 25 year old trekkie
wrote a little thing about the state of star trek and the world, and returned to my trekkie roots at the same time. have a read if you'd like <3
My first memory of Star Trek is fuzzy. A weird show on the TV when I couldnât have been more than 12. A group of people in multi-coloured uniforms scanning walls and talking to each other, a strange looking man with gold-tinted skin in a yellow jumper. I know this isnât a unique story, but itâs a universal one. The young kid in the living room watching Mr Spock or Commander Data, the Klingons and the Romulans and the Borg, itâs an occurrence that has been see in living rooms across the world from 1966. And just like most of these other kids, I fell in love with the show. I started with the reboots, or the âAbramsverseâ, I wrote silly stories with my best friend, I played make believe, and I fell in love with it. I remember meeting Robert Picardo at a convention in Glasgow, whilst wearing an Into Darkness era red shirt and telling him I was a massive fan, I had seen all of the series, even Enterprise! (which I loved, fyi). He laughed and said, âbut youâre so young!â.
But I think it was because I was so young that I loved it so much.
I was a naĂŻve kid (arguably I still am at 25) and whilst I still believe that humanity can be brilliant, back then I really believed it. Politics was still boring and adult-ish, but Scotland was voting for its independence, and I was starting to get a sense of how it would impact me, and with my little trek-goggles on, how it would impact and change my world. My country would have the freedom to do what we believed was right, make our own choices and choose our own path (maybe thereâs a metaphor for the teenage years here too, but thatâs another procrastination induced essay). Of course, we all know how this story ends, the No Vote won, and that was that. I was devastated, my dad was bitter and cynical, but I had Star Trek. The Bajorans chose to remain close to their âunionâ in the end, and they were fine. We would be fine too.
Then things started to get a little bit scarier. People wanted to leave the EU, apparently there were all these people entering the country that donât belong here. I was told that itâs not fair, then that it was too expensive, then that they were dangerous. The UK started to feel quite insular, there was another referendum, but this time the Yes Vote won. Someone else won in 2016 as well.
Nichelle Nichols once said that Star Trek didnât promise things would get magically better, but that weâd progress slowly, steadily, even if it was centuries of taking two steps forward and one step back. Maybe this was one of those steps backwards?
Okay. Maybe itâs a few of those steps backward.
Now itâs 2025. Thereâs been a global pandemic, a few new wars, many, many elections, that guy won again, the other guy in the UK might be winning, and as Iâm writing this, it really feels like weâve stepped so far back that weâre in the dark ages. We have some of the Star Trek tech now, but Christ, this isnât how Kirk or Picard would have used it. Instead of Dataâs, AI has created a society that feels like Barclay getting sucked into the illusion of the holodeck. I open twitter on the phone that was once the real-world communicator to see an endless stream of new conflicts, people crying out for help, and petitions to stop the backpedalling of human rights. What happened?
I still love Star Trek, but it feels different now. Thereâs been a few new shows, the bold return of Trek to TV with Discovery, Patrick Stewartâs five-star nostalgia trip with Picard, Lower Decks, Prodigy, Strange New Worlds, just to name a few. The story of kids in the living room seeing a random episode on TV still continues, but itâs got a shadow to it now.
Its Nu-Trek. Too fancy. Too woke. That last one is the most common, anything that shows a black person, a gay person, God forbid a trans person, it gets slapped with the woke phrase. Star Trek has apparently been âruinedâ by woke. Not worth watching anymore, turn that rubbish off because itâs nothing compared to my Star Trek.
But thatâs the thing. Star Trek has always been woke, you just didnât realise it.
At the height of the red scare and in the aftermath of the Cold War, Gene Roddenberry sat down and decided to make one of his main characters a young Russian man called Pavel Chekov. He worked alongside the great James T Kirk onboard the USS Enterprise, a vessel named for one of the most decorated ships of WW2, and no one on board batted an eye. When black people couldnât even share a bathroom with their fellow human beings simply because they were black, Nyota Uhura (whose first name wasnât actually canon until 2009) was working as chief communications officer, and even commanding the ship in The Lorelei Signal. In that same episode, she leads an all-female away team to the planet to save their crew, a scene that would undoubtedly be scoffed at and branded âwoke cringeâ today. You disagree? simply look at reactions to that one scene in Endgame, or to any female led superhero movie.
And this âwokenessâ wasnât just on camera; it was behind it too. Nichelle Nichols and William Shatner fought for the first on-screen interracial kiss to be shot and aired, D.C Fontana broke barriers writing for Trek under a pseudonym, because she was a woman hiding that fact in a male dominated field. George Takei, an Asian man playing a genius pilot (and one-time pirate) when Asian men almost exclusively played stereotypes or servants.
Oh, but all this gender and sexuality stuff! I hear you cry. Thatâs all the woke agenda, you say. I say no. I think that Adira Tal, played by the wonderful Blu Del Barrio in Discovery, is owed an apology. Commander Riker, the classic alpha type, flirtatious, Kirk wanna-be boy scout, praised for his masculinity, quite famously falls in love with Soren, a non-binary person part of the Jânaii. Whilst Soren is referred to with she/her pronouns, they visibly struggle with the misidentification and discusses how their species finds gender specific pronouns âprimitiveâ. âOh, but Gene Roddenberry wasnât involved in thisâ, actually, no. Heâs credited as executive producer, and most likely greenlit its production before he sadly passed, probably around the same time he expressed the desire to introduce more LGBTQ+ themes into his show.
I could go on endlessly. Every single cry of âtoo wokeâ or âtoo preachyâ can be countered by going back to the Trek that purists put on a pedestal.
Do I think Star Trek is perfect? Absolutely not! I personally would be happy with a fraction of the budget and a return to suspiciously phallic-shaped polystyrene painted to look like rocks and terriers wearing
fur coats and glued on horns. Because Star Trek isnât fancy budgets, and incredible CGI, VFX, and explosions â its heart.
Itâs looking up at the night sky and saying, âwe could be up there one dayâ. Itâs finding our place among the stars. Its Lily talking to Picard at the end of First Contact, that we envy the world these characters get to go back to. But the next line is equally true â they would envy us, taking these first steps into a new frontier.
There are some very bad people in charge right now, and very bad things happening in the world. Itâs not a complete coincidence that Iâve stumbled back into Star Trek. Not as an idealistic pre-teen, but as a really scared adult. Hatred seems to be everywhere, and so stupidly loud and itâs even seeped into my life in really painful ways. What has happened?
I saw a YouTube comment underneath a clip of Wrath of Khan asking the same thing â what has happened to Star Trek? Where did these amazing stories go? The most recent attempt to breathe life into Star Trek again, Starfleet Academy, was cancelled after just two seasons. Jonthan Frakes said that heâd officially directed his last episode of Trek â its bleak.
But those stories, theyâre still there, I promise you. What was written in Discovery, or Starfleet Academy is the exact same as what was written in Deep Space Nine, or even The Original Series. Itâs just in a shinier packaging and written by people who grew up watching (and acting in) the shows you watched as a kid. Revisionists just seem to be attacking it at the seams.
Theyâll tell you that Star Trek was never this political, that it didnât shove things down your throat, that it didnât preach at you. Theyâll also tell you that Kirk was out there shooting phasers and starting bar fights. To that I say Picard was more likely to get into a bar fight than Kirk. At the Academy, Kirk was called a stack of books on legs. He stopped to smell flowers on away missions, he didnât sleep around and womanize, he fell in love over and over again. And speaking of Picard, he was the preacher. He quite literally spelled it out for us, if steeped in the occasional spandex and experimental SFX makeup.
Star Trek showed a civilisation that strived to be the best it could possibly be. And that dream has existed since before Trek first aired, but from the moment Gene Roddenberry put pen to paper and breathed life into the first ever Star Trek pilot that was canned by NBC for being âtoo cerebral and intellectualâ. When Star Trek did come back for a second pilot, it was with more action and excitement, but the same heart. Much later, the show would be criticised for its overly-intellectual and hard to understand plotlines, and many would be uncomfortable with its progressive ideals. The same happens today, except on a much wider scale â the people who claim to love Star Trek, yet hate what makes it Star Trek. Rather than letters and radio stations, they have the echo chamber of the internet where they can scream about what they donât understand and therefore must hate. Networks and streaming sites put emphasis on consumption and viewer reactions, and the hatred has just gotten louder. Its destroying Star Trek the same way itâs destroying our world.
Weâre all so quick to judge, so glued to our phones, so isolationist in our lives. So angry and bitter, and so quick to hate anything or anyone thatâs a little bit different. In Star Trek canon, itâs mentioned that we almost destroyed ourselves a few years before first contact, that nuclear war and hatred were the precursor to that idyllic utopia shown. We have to step backwards to go forwards sometimes. But we keep taking steps.
In the past few weeks, Iâve watched the Artemis II crew go further than anyone has gone before. This is our step forward. There may be $200 million dollars going to fund wars and violence and conflict, but thereâs $20 million dollars funding progression. I donât know Wiseman, or Coch, or Hansen or Glover, but I can say with almost certainty that if you ask them about Star Trek, theyâll all have a similar story, or a memory. They might not be fans, they might prefer Star Wars, or Firefly. But they fell in love with the future, and the idea that we can get there one day and be better than we ever thought possible. They all fell in love with the ideal that Star Trek embodies â infinite diversity in infinite combinations, and going where no one has gone before.
Now, I will go back to my life. I have no idea what will happen next â with Star Trek or the world. But weâll get there, because there are still TVâs on, and there are still kids watching silly sci-fi shows.
Star Trek has been and always shall be woke. You just turned into one of the people who didnât want to watch it.











