Tactical Buttcheeks

1. You are responsible for your own media experience. 

2. There is such a thing as a healthy level of avoidance towards topics that make you feel unwell or even (in a real-life clinical definition of the term) trigger you - but you are the one to actively take care of what you view.

3. Avoiding does not mean policing others.

4. You have no right to tell artists to censor themselves - you may criticize what others do, you may dislike it, that’s fine - but actively asking for censorship when you could easily unfollow or block a person just makes you look incompetent in your use of the internet.

Made & selling a Tiefling base to use for adopts or to make Tiefling OCs! $30 USD. Once bought I will email the full psd file to you. No reselling or sharing the base with others I keep track of everyone who has bought the base.

Base contains: - Varied body types (masc and fem) in varied sizes (regular, plus size, and muscular) - 5 feet options - 6 tails - 20 types of horns - 9 ears - 2 wings - 16 bangs - 5 sideburns - 6 short hairstyles - 10 medium hairstyles - 14 long hairstyles - 2 braid styles - 2 head wear pieces (hijab and dastar) - 20 face extras (freckles, beards, moles, etc.) - 7 body extras (fluff, spikes, and freckles)

[…] Some fans argue that AO3 should be actively moderating more of the content posted on-site, even though it has exclusionary tag systems so that you can, personally, tailor and be responsible for your own AO3 experience.

Don’t like a pairing or tag situation? Hide it and you never have to worry about seeing it! In addition, AO3 does have a Policy & Abuse team that deals with issues like plagiarism, harassment, and violations of its content policies; it’s not the Wild West out there, despite what this new breed of moral panic-mongers would have you believe.

[…] There’s a persistent, and, for me, exceedingly strange swerve these days towards demanding The Powers That Be censor and remove fanworks that some users deem problematic, often with a pearl-clutching sentiment attached that the youth are being corrupted from exposure to unsavory themes, or the mere possibility of exposure.

These sentiments always remind me of the people who used to assert in the 18th and 19th centuries that the act of novel-reading would corrupt a young woman’s mind, and that (especially) women couldn’t be trusted with so dangerous an activity as reading or choosing their own reading material.”

Obviously, we’re REALLY mad because this one guy is trying to claim the work of thousands as his own, and the copyright will severely affect everyone involved in the Foundation, ESPECIALLY those who make their living off of it.

This copyright came up before in the past- and was briefly forgotten for some reason- and now the administrators are working to sue Andrew Duskin (as you can see here), but the process of suing someone is very expensive.

The main issue we all have with this is him trying to copyright everything. Like I said, it’s the work of thousands of people, and by putting a copyright on the Foundation, the whole thing might come to a halt and shut down because of copyright laws.

Which is, again, why he is (rightfully) getting sued.