People is talking about that Bayonetta 3’s story is not as good as the other two, which is true in my opinion; however, unlike most of the people who claims that Bayonetta and Bayonetta 2 are well-written, I think both of them were well-told but the details and logic just barely worked.
To sum up,
Bayonetta 1- a cool story, but don’t ever think about how’s Cereza refused to be sealed because of the time travel, and the only influence of it was that Bayonetta recalled everything. Technically, if the future altered, Luka’s dad should have lived and Luka might not meet Bayonetta; moreover, Jeanne should have never been brainwashed by Balder, since she should still stay with Bayonetta after the witch hunt. And everything may not happened, I guess?
Bayonetta 2- a cool story and it’s better than the first one, but it is easy to see that the whole story is built for the first one. I think it is really weird that Loptr make everything complicated only to take the eyes and eliminate Loki. Since Loptr was able to kill Rosa solely, and was able to fight against Bayonetta and Balder together and take away the eyes, why not just take them away directly in the first place and kill Loki while he hasn’t awakened his full memory and power? Was that only to make Loki awake his power, take away the power of the both eyes, and be captured by Balder while escaping, getting back with him to make the time loop for Bayonetta 1?
Bayonetta 3- Well, it is what it is. Seriously, I’m not really sure who this Bayonetta is. Is it the one in Bayonetta 1 & 2 or the small Cereza in Bayonetta 1, who makes the parallel universe of the other 2? I think that it is the later one and yet not really sure about the whole idea.
