cover me in gasoline

I need a blowjob but I don’t have a penis or a strap on and I’m not taking off my pants so you’re just gonna have to figure it out

does anyone have the tweets hanif abdurraqib made about soul punk in 2020

The fact that virtually any popular post on this site featuring a video of someone doing wacky shenanigans or playing a bit that has nothing to do with masculinity will inevitably get tagged with 'boys will be boys' says a lot about how gender hegemony operates to entrench the social construct of the 'boy' by first invoking and then naturalizing it. Why did you feel the need to classify the subject of the video as a 'boy'? Why do you feel the need to assert that this subject, whom you have defined as a 'boy', will (always? naturally? inevitably?) be a 'boy'? And even if such a thing made sense and was true, why would you feel the need to say it and therefore explicitly state what ought to be natural and obvious? Do you also write "air will be air" or "rice will be rice" on posts featuring those subjects as well? What message are you conveying, consciously or not, when you say that a certain form of gender is circular and eternal?

WHAT ARE YALL READING RN you must tell me

not to be pedantic & political but I’m seeing a lot of “medical malpractice 😍” and tbh as far as I’m concerned, whether it’s malpractice or not is kind of irrelevant to the hotness lol. in fact it’s hotter if it’s not. the system approves!

doctors must do no harm, so therefore they are categorically incapable of doing harm. if you think they did harm, then you must be sorely mistaken, because they’re a doctor, and doctors do no harm. see how the circle works?

It’s crazy to watch people in one colonial state think they’re better and morally superior to people in other colonial states you need to get a grip severely

The reason I hate British people is not because I am an American but because I am Indian in fact i would not be in America if it weren’t for them let’s be clear and so fr

i know making fun of people like this is low hanging fruit but lol "more brutal than the capitalists" amiguito during the 20th century capitalists committed the holocaust

anti-communism keeps circling back to implicit or explicit holocaust apologia. which could mean nothing,

I need capitalists to look up the famines caused by the UKs capitalist colonialism so bad. India alone suffered more deaths than any communist countries.

The expected loss of life as a result of Britain's colonial occupation of India is estimated to be around 165 million people in just 40 years. This is more than pretty much every death attributable to communism ever.