Mamdani is neither an anti-Semite for saying “Free Palestine, genocide bad” surface level shit, nor is he anti-Zionist for saying that surface level shit.
On one side are liberals who think they’re for Palestine defending him as an anti-Zionist, the other side are overt Zionists attacking him for “anti-semetism” and “supporting terrorists”. Both perspectives have twisted the reality of Zohran Mamdani.
Both liberals and overt Zionists are stuck on his surface level gestures and statements. Neither are actually reacting to or considering anything he’s actually doing or saying (or not doing or not saying) — the man’s words and actions actually serve Zionism. This is because, despite however many times he calls Netanyahu a war criminal, he normalizes Zionism and the Zionist entity; he preserves the very systems which support Zionism. Those systems aren’t challenged by him/by anyone’s liberalism. If he did, he would not be allowed his platform. (Read Pitfalls of Liberalism by Kwame Ture to better understand this point).
So there is this confusion which happens, where whenever anyone who is principled by Al Thawabit for Palestinian liberation calls Mamdani out for his Liberal-Zionism and normalizing, we are the ones immediately told to shut up & accused of actually being Zionists ourselves for “trying to divide the movement”. This is not Mamdani’s movement. He serves Zionism. An easy tell that this was always going to be this way with him was when, before he was even elected, he took the stand at the debates to claim he believes the Zionist entity of “israel” has the right to exist, and then stated the Palestinian armed resistance were “war criminals” on the level with Netanyahu. He validates the invalid Zionist Hasbara atrocity propaganda against Palestinians.
The result of this confusion = too many of those who consider themselves “pro”-Palestine do not know how to properly identify Zionism in its more liberal or “progressive” cloak (Liberal-Zionism). Being unable to identify Zionism serves Zionism. Mamdani is an agent of Zionism in this way and in other more overt ways too — when he defended NYC Zionists selling off stolen Palestinian land in their synagogues by conflating their settler-colonialist activity with “right to worship safely” because actual principled pro-Palestine activists protested at these synagogues. He retained a Zionist NYPD commissioner. He is moving forward with building a 16 story prison in Chinatown built by the same military contractor who builds for the IOF. He silences supporters of the resistance when they chant for their glory against the entity. He uses his identity as a Shia Muslim to mask his actual movements. He collaborated with known Liberal-Zionist NGOs to get their votes. He won’t arrest the many IOF thugs who walk freely thru the streets of NYC. Maduro is jailed in his vicinity *right now* and yet he won’t do shit about it.
Because people think he looks cute, dresses nice, rides a bicycle thru the streets without security guards, says “Free Palestine”, says he cares about queer people, says he’ll do all kinds of things he doesn’t mean to do so that pacifiable New Yorker’s can “get their’s”, challenging his actual actions and words is seen as an affront to the cause of Palestine itself when in actuality openly challenging his Liberal-Zionism serves the cause of Palestine (Al Thawabit)!
It’s not just ironic — this is always convenient for Zionist powers, every time a SocDem US politician replicates into yet another one claiming to “be the change”, hoping you’re too stupid and trusting to look at their foreign policy for even a second.
Again, Mamdani doesn’t serve Palestine nor their liberation movement. He serves the presiding systems, he keeps them intact.
Y’all aren’t even well-meaning in my eyes because you look up to some NYC mayor on the matter of Palestine’s liberation but you don’t know Nizar Banat or Yahya Sinwar or Bassel Al Araj… Mamdani won’t challenge these systems which uphold Zionism, lest he be made to sacrifice his own power. Sacrifice is not what Liberals do. They exist to maintain, enable, placate and benefit from oppression.
Ture says that the liberal is the oppressor, but he is the least powerful limb of the oppressor. He never challenges the oppressor, he only challenges the oppressed, telling them that adjusting their behavior, and staying non-violent against the oppressor will liberate them.
Are you learning anything?