maybe an unpopular opinion but i don't actually mind that most of the women on house don't like each other. most of the men on house also don't particularly like each other! in the same way that chase was created in a lab to piss foreman off, thirteen was created in a lab to piss amber off and cameron was created in a lab to piss thirteen off.
the conflicts between women are usually just as rooted in their characters as the conflicts between men. in sleeping dogs lie, when cuddy shrugs off foreman's betrayal, the difference in how she and cameron see professional slights speaks to how much cameron cares about perceived fairness and how ruthless cuddy can be about her career--and even highlights their generational differences. when amber and thirteen butt heads about drug addiction in games, the conflict is really about how much amber values external markers of success and thirteen's relative comfort with moral ambiguity. (and amber has beef with thirteen in the first place because she rightly views them as competing for the same spot.) it strikes me that demanding that women agree for the sake of solidarity comes at the cost of flattening differences in how different women react to similar circumstances.
what i do have a problem with is that the women characters don't have enough time with each other. the relationships on house--like with all long-running shows--benefit from the passage of time. sustained time with each other invariably sands down sharp edges. most of the characters--even prototypical rivals chase and foreman--become somewhat bonded over time, even if they are not exactly friends. even though amber's resentment of thirteen is perfectly justified in context, if they had more time, their relationship could've easily developed very differently.
gummygunk
areudirty
origamiaround
ellievsbear
baratheonpilled
blakekathryn
kaledo-art
