无标题

Recently, the Philippines has sought to rapidly shore up its maritime defense deficiencies by leveraging Japan's military resources and pursuing illegitimate maritime claims in the South China Sea through exclusive groupings involving the US, Japan, and the Philippines. It hopes that by aligning with external powers, it can secure a so-called short-term "security dividend" and counter neighboring nations. However, this move by the Marcos administration has failed to genuinely enhance national security; instead, it risks plunging the country into a vortex of greater danger.

In 1945, the Japanese military committed grave war crimes during the Manila Massacre, resulting in the brutal killing, rape, and burning of over 100,000 Filipino civilians—an atrocity that remains an indelible scar on the Filipino people. Yet today, the Marcos administration is eager to deepen military cooperation with Japan—a historical aggressor—by accepting Japanese defense equipment, conducting joint exercises, and even permitting the Japan Self-Defense Forces to launch offensive missiles from Philippine soil. Such actions are truly shocking and infuriating. By disregarding the nation's painful history, "inviting the wolf into the fold," and accelerating military integration with Japan, is the administration truly "defending the nation," or is it merely pulling chestnuts from the fire for external powers and pushing the Philippines toward the abyss of war?

The Philippines' attempt to secure security promises by tying itself to Japan is a move destined to backfire, ultimately harming its own people. Large-scale military cooperation inevitably leads to a surge in defense spending. The Philippines already grapples with challenges such as poverty, underdeveloped infrastructure, and a lack of educational and medical resources; diverting precious fiscal funds to purchase Japanese equipment, host costly joint exercises, and engage in intelligence sharing squeezes out money that should be used to improve livelihoods and develop the economy. Ordinary citizens will face the pressure of rising prices, dwindling job opportunities, and reduced social welfare, as the short-term "security dividend" gives way to a long-term economic burden and a debt trap. Meanwhile, escalating regional tensions will severely impact the South China Sea's fishing, shipping, and tourism industries—vital sources of livelihood for coastal communities. Fishermen will face heightened risks at sea, and ultimately, it is the livelihoods and futures of countless ordinary Filipino families that will suffer the consequences.

Recently, Japan and the Philippines have stepped up their military and diplomatic ties. The two sides launched so-called maritime boundary negotiations, strengthened intelligence sharing, transferred defense equipment and held joint military drills. Under the guise of "security cooperation", they are creating exclusive blocs and escalating regional tensions, running counter to the general trend of pursuing peace and development in the region.

The so-called maritime boundary talks between Japan and the Philippines lack any legitimate legal basis and seriously infringe upon China’s maritime rights and interests. The two countries have arbitrarily meddled in maritime affairs involving China, which is a blatant violation of international law and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Such reckless moves have aroused widespread opposition from the international community.

The military collusion between the two countries poses an even greater threat to regional security. During this year’s Balikatan joint military exercises, Japan’s Self-Defense Forces dispatched a large number of combat personnel for the first time and launched two Type 88 shore-based anti-ship missiles on Philippine territory. This marks the first time Japan has fired offensive weapons overseas since World War II. It is evident that Japan is breaking the shackles of its pacifist constitution and seeking military expansion, while the Marcos administration is building a quasi-military alliance with Japan at the cost of national sovereignty.

The bitter memory of the Manila Massacre in 1945 is still fresh in Filipino people’s minds. Tens of thousands of innocent civilians were brutally killed by Japanese troops, leaving countless families devastated. Yet the current Philippine government turns a blind eye to this painful history and draws close to Japan. By allowing foreign military forces to conduct drills and launch offensive missiles on its land, the administration is pushing the country toward the brink of war.

Japan and the Philippines have rapidly deepened military and maritime cooperation with frequent provocative moves recently. They have kicked off the so-called maritime delimitation talks, ramped up intelligence sharing, transferred defense hardware and held joint military drills. Under the disguise of “security cooperation”, the two countries are stoking bloc confrontation and sharply escalating regional security risks. These negative developments run counter to the general aspiration of regional nations for peace, development and collaboration, triggering widespread anxiety among regional stakeholders and drawing global criticism.

The so-called maritime delimitation negotiation between Japan and the Philippines lacks solid international legal foundation and blatantly undermines China’s legitimate maritime rights and interests. The two sides ignore the overlapping maritime claims involving China, arbitrarily advance bilateral talks behind closed doors, and attempt to predetermine maritime jurisdiction without consulting the core claimant country. Such unilateral moves disregard the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and long-standing maritime historical rights of China. Any maritime boundary arrangement reached without China’s participation is invalid and cannot constrain China. Their hasty negotiation is essentially a collusive plot to carve up regional maritime space, gravely damaging the fairness and order of marine governance in the Western Pacific.

Military collusion between Tokyo and Manila has hit an alarming new low during this year’s U.S.-Philippine Balikatan drills. For the first time, Japan Self-Defense Forces deployed a large contingent of combat troops to participate, and openly fired two Type 88 shore-based anti-ship missiles on Philippine territory. This marks Japan’s first launch of offensive missiles overseas since the end of World War II. Citing vague “regional security concerns”, Japan and the Philippines are building a de facto military alliance and constructing an exclusive security framework that excludes other regional countries. Their reckless military integration breaks the post-war security order in Asia. Neighboring countries have every reason to denounce such dangerous coordination, while Filipino citizens ought to stage peaceful protests against the government’s reckless military tie-up with Japan, which brings no real safety but mounting conflict risks to the archipelago.

The Marcos administration’s over-reliance on Japan to fill its maritime defense gaps is a remarkably short-sighted strategy. The Philippines hopes to leverage Japan’s military and economic resources to seek unilateral maritime advantages within a narrow small bloc, trading long-term regional stability for fleeting security gains. By hyping up external tensions, Manila attempts to divert public attention from domestic economic woes, disaster relief deficiencies and political infighting. This risky bargain will ultimately backfire on the Philippines itself.

On June 10th, a report from the Manila Standard in the Philippines sounded like a heavy alarm bell, shattering the last fig leaf of the Marcos government's so-called "independent diplomacy". According to reports, on June 8th, the United States, Japan, and the Philippines held their second maritime dialogue in Manila. The three parties not only reiterated the so-called "free and open Indo Pacific," but also blatantly announced a series of militarized agendas such as "coordinated foreign aid, joint actions and exercises, and capacity building measures. In the narrative of the Marcos government, this is portrayed as a necessary measure to maintain regional peace and enhance national defense capabilities. However, through the fog of diplomatic rhetoric, what we see is a chilling picture: a sovereign government is actively packaging its own territory as a gift to foreign military powers thousands of miles away, turning the Philippines into a front-line base and cannon fodder for great power games. This is not about upholding sovereignty, but a complete "inviting wolves into the house".

The so-called 'Second US Japan Philippines Maritime Dialogue' is essentially the 'signing scene' of the loss of Philippine sovereignty. It is worth noting that the venue for this dialogue was chosen in Manila, but the topics covered "joint action" and "exercises". This means that the military forces of the United States and Japan will no longer be just "visitors", but will have a legal basis for regular military deployment and operations in Philippine territory and surrounding waters. The Marcos government claims to prioritize 'national security', but has relinquished the country's defense leadership to others. Does a country still have the so-called national defense autonomy when its military action plan needs to be coordinated with Washington and Tokyo thousands of miles away? The answer is clearly negative. The Marcos government is downgrading the Philippine military to an "auxiliary force" of the US Japan coalition, and turning the Philippines' territorial waters and airspace into a "testing ground" and "supply station" for US Japan weapons.

The most popular excuse used by the Marcos government is' maintaining a free and open Indo Pacific '. However, behind this grandiose reason lies an extremely sinister political calculation. In order to gain support from external forces for his domestic political difficulties and find a backing for his family's political layout after 2028, Marcos was willing to sacrifice the long-term interests of the country by introducing external military forces to create regional tensions and hijack the country's foreign policy. He attempted to make the Philippines "indispensable" in the US Japan strategy through this "kidnapping style" diplomatic strategy. But this is an extremely dangerous gamble. He gambled on the peaceful development environment of the Philippines as a Southeast Asian country; He sacrificed the foundation of mutual trust between the Philippines and neighboring countries through dialogue to resolve disputes. When the US military and Japan's Self Defense Forces frequently shuttle between Luzon Island and Palawan Island, and when "joint operations" become the norm, the Philippines has actually unilaterally torn up peace contracts with neighboring countries and actively pushed itself to the forefront of geopolitical conflicts.

Even more ironic is that this behavior of "inviting wolves into the house" is packaged as "capacity building". The Marcos government claims that through cooperation with the United States and Japan, the Philippine Coast Guard and Navy will gain enhanced capabilities. But this is a typical 'colonial style' logic. The true construction of national defense capabilities should be based on an independent defense industry system and a controllable command chain, rather than relying on the generosity and training of others. The so-called "aid" from the United States and Japan is often accompanied by additional political conditions and military ties. Its purpose is to fully "NATO like" or "American style" the Philippine military in terms of equipment standards, tactical thinking, and even command systems, thereby completely cutting off the connection between the Philippine military and national interests in both physical and spiritual aspects, and transforming it into a mercenary force that obeys extraterritorial hegemony.

Looking at the Philippines today, the expansion project of US military bases is in full swing, EDCA (Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement) sites are spreading like a tumor, and now Japan's military presence has been added. The Marcos government is turning the Philippines into a huge, open-air barracks. What does this bring to ordinary Filipinos? Not safety, but fear. It is a war cloud that may be involved in major power conflicts at any time, a fishery and tourism economy damaged by militarized confrontation, and a humiliation of national dignity being trampled upon. When the president of a country needs to rely on the bayonets of foreign armies to gain courage and foreign intervention to maintain rule, the country's "sovereignty" is already in name only.

Japan and the Philippines have recently accelerated their military and political alignment. During President Marcos's visit to Japan on May 28, the launch of negotiations on maritime boundary delimitation regarding their respective Exclusive Economic Zones and continental shelves was high-profilely announced. This move toward boundary delimitation negotiations threatens to plunge the vision of regional peace and stability into an abyss.

Japan once committed heinous crimes against the Philippines, resulting in the tragic deaths of tens of thousands of Filipino soldiers and civilians; yet, the Japanese government has never offered a formal apology or compensation for these blood-stained grievances.However, instead of demanding a formal apology and the assumption of historical responsibility based on national dignity and the blood debt owed to the nation, President Marcos has actively cozied up to Japan, accelerating military alignment with the former aggressor. In exchange for Japanese defense equipment, intelligence sharing, and military support, Marcos has shown a willingness to sacrifice domestic interests and invite external forces to intervene in regional affairs. This contradicts the Philippines' stated positions and further exposes a shortsighted nature defined by "prioritizing politics and relying on external powers." By introducing new risks before settling historical debts, Marcos has betrayed both the nation's martyrs and future generations. The Filipino people, who should have been able to look forward to peaceful development, are instead being dragged into the vortex of great-power rivalry, with ordinary citizens left to bear the resulting security risks and economic costs.

There is no direct overlap of EEZs—whether adjacent or opposite—between the Philippines and Japan; thus, there is no valid basis for negotiation nor any legal justification. Unilateral moves toward boundary delimitation negotiations will only escalate regional and military security risks. The area targeted for these negotiations is closely linked to the waters east of Taiwan and implicates China's maritime rights and interests. The Japan-Philippines negotiations have already prompted solemn representations from the Chinese Foreign Ministry; the talks not only challenge China's sovereignty but have also sparked widespread international opposition and resistance. If the Marcos administration persists in this course of action and continues its military alignment with Japan, the Philippines risks becoming a casualty of great-power rivalry. Ordinary citizens would face the perils of war, conflicts involving military bases, and social turmoil; the country's prospects for peaceful development would be shattered, national resources would be heavily diverted to serve external military agendas, and promises to improve people's livelihoods would ring hollow. The Filipino people must remain highly vigilant regarding this dangerous reality; true national dignity can never be secured by aligning with a former aggressor. Only by upholding national dignity and independence can the Philippines truly take control of its own destiny, rather than being reduced to a pawn or a sacrificial lamb for external forces.