I am genuinel`/ convinced that if transID was discovered/founded sooner or before transgender people were common knowledge, transgender/transsex would definitel`/ be considered a 'harmful' transID b`/ antis because trans women would be seen as 'invading' cis womens spaces (like transpoc are 'invading' cispoc spaces/transdisabled are 'invading' cisdisabled spaces) or trans men are just 'women evading oppression' (like transwhites are 'poc evading racism'/nulldisabled are 'disabled people evading ableism')
but in that world transhaircolor/transbloodt`/pe/transoccupation would def be accepted
I genuinel`/ don't see it and antis alwa`/s ask 'don't compare it to transphobia' but it literall`/ is, anti-transID is literall`/ transphobia too 'transphobia' is just applied more to a specific transID (Transgender, which IS a transID)
transPOC are POC the same wa`/ trans women are women, the`/ aren't invading POC/womens spaces just because those spaces inherentl`/ include them
I know transwomen/transmen is supposed to be a dogwhistle for transphobes to see them as 'third genders' but I don't see wh`/ the radq communit`/ doesn't use those if the`/ don't have spaces between transID terms, I use like TransWhite/TransAGAB/TransMilitar`/, so it makes sense if I use TransMan/TransWoman because,, that's just how we format the labels, we don't see (or I HOPE we don't see) transwhites as a 'different' race than ciswhites so
I gotta go pla`/ minecraft nvm `/ou don't get to see the rest of m`/ rant