You are a completely retarded and narrow minded idiot that's unable to grasp the glaring context of application, get the fuck out of here. This concerns any kind of utterance that either generically refers to an audience/group in direct or indirect address (e.g. 'huh, everybody is making unwise choices these days') or uses a generic individualizing referrer with defining human or living connotation or denotation, such as what can be found in dictionaries ( 'carpenter – a person/someone/one whose job is making and repairing wooden objects and structures'), which is an everyday reality of language one has to inevitably tackle. Even in direct address to a small group it's not always possible to ask everyentity and even when it is, between the entity that identifies as a canine centipede, and the others as cyborgs, seas, aliens and the concept of purity and hope you'll have to find a broader referer if your goal is to express an idea applied to this group that clearly points at them as a whole; even when all of them identify as something that allows for 'beings' or 'people' or other as a generic qualifier, entity must be used because it is the term of a transhumanist agenda — we establish it and capture terrains — and maintains ideological and terminological continuity with what radqueers spread elsewhere. Moreover, narrow minded entity, 'those who' or 'one who' is not always possible to use, such as in the kind of context i mentioned at the beginning (besides having living connotation). Couldn't give a fuck less if there are entities that don't like it, during direct and indirect referral of entire groups or generic singular refferal it must be used because it's the broadest, the most practical, cool-sounding, and transhumanism-aligned so far. Yes, when you refer to one specific entity in direct or indirect address whose address preferences are known or inferable use their preferred term, but otherwise, don't. So now you can get the fuck out of here fr

If i'm being called ableist, i at least hope it's also because of my use of the word idiot; bc if it's only due to retarded, then you are a massive, gigantic, gargantuan idiot, since both words are and imply the same!

TransID rights are the future and the rest of you are just going to have to find a way to contend with that because we are here to stay. We've always been here and we're always going to be here.

You are a completely idiotic and narrow minded gorilla that's unable to grasp the glaring context of application, get the fuck out of here. This concerns any kind of utterance that either generically refers to an audience/group in direct or indirect address (e.g. 'huh, everybody is making unwise choices these days') or uses a generic individualizing referrer with defining human or living connotation or denotation, such as what can be found in dictionaries ( 'carpenter – a person/someone/one whose job is making and repairing wooden objects and structures'), which is an everyday reality of language one has to inevitably tackle. Even in direct address to a small group it's not always possible to ask everyentity and even when it is, between the entity that identifies as a canine centipede, and the others as cyborgs, seas, aliens and the concept of purity and hope you'll have to find a broader referer if your goal is to express an idea applied to this group that clearly points at them as a whole; even when all of them identify as something that allows for 'beings' or 'people' or other as a generic qualifier, entity must be used because it is the term of a transhumanist agenda — we establish it and capture terrains — and maintains ideological and terminological continuity with what radqueers spread elsewhere. Moreover, narrow minded entity, 'those who' or 'one who' is not always possible to use, such as in the kind of context i mentioned at the beginning (besides having living connotation). Couldn't give a fuck less if there are entities that don't like it, during direct and indirect referral of entire groups or generic singular refferal it must be used because it's the broadest, the most practical, cool-sounding, and transhumanism-aligned so far. Yes, when you refer to one specific entity in direct or indirect address whose address preferences are known or inferable use their preferred term, but otherwise, don't. So now you can get the fuck out of here fr