TIM DRAKE being ROBIN again IS NOTĀ regression. Thatās a misunderstanding.
Tim being Robin again, is honestly the best thing for the character that they could do at the moment. I know a lot of people in the fandom have started after that fact, and therefore arenāt aware why people so many people arenātĀ happy and want Tim to be Robin again and stay that way, but thereās plenty of reasons why.
To me, the argument against it is always based on accepting things without knowing that the events may not have been well-written from the start, or this weird notion that Robin doesnāt mean much and itās a bad thing for Tim to be it. But to me, that doesnāt make any sense.
Iām not a fan of people who act like itās weird to want Tim to be Robin again, because they always never really try to process the whys.
They always sayĀ āHeās moved onā, or that Robin would be regression.
But thatās all based off of writing that was made to validate the decision, and superficial logic, rather than reading enough to know that the writing wasnāt good, and well, superficial logic isnāt the best.
You canāt just naturally assume all the writing is good as part of the defense to your argument. Thatās something Iāve learned just by reading as much as I have.
Robin isnāt naturally regression. Just because Dick viewed Robin as being a kidās thing, doesnāt mean thatās what Tim thought.Ā
Just because one person viewed something as one thing, doesnāt mean another will. Thatās not how that would work when writing things in a natural manner.
Tim is a fictional character with a certain development and made purpose. To be Robin, he is a character made purely to be Robin, and developed as only wanting to be Robin.
So by that token, what Iām saying is, Timās purpose as a character is to be Robin, and the character itself would not want anything else.
Thatās generally agreed upon.
But something people accept is that Tim being kicked in the first place made any sense when considering everything.
In the screenshots above, Tim was telling that to Dick Grayson, so Dick would know that if Tim wasnāt Robin, that would mean to Tim that he wouldnāt be a hero anymore. Dick Grayson is incredibly protective of Tim. When he is aware on Timās feelings on Robin, and how Dick feels about Tim, it doesnāt make a lot of sense for Dick to kick him.
People use that Dick was mourning as well, Damian needed Robin, and that Tim was his equal to defend that. But thatās just the stuff that was written to validate it afterwards, not what made sense.
Tim was Robin for 3 years or so in canon, he is established as not being as good as the other Robins as far as natural talent went. Itās what a lot of his character moments and stories are made out of. Dick was Robin for 8 years at the least, and was a natural talent.
Dick cares a lot and loves about Tim, but heās also one to shove him out of trouble, and hereās about how not so good he feels. He wouldnāt be blinded by his love to just say heās his equal when thatās shown to not be the case.
So what Iām saying with that is that them using the idea that Tim is viewed as Dickās equal doesnāt actually make sense.Ā Tim is still a kid, he was 17 years old at the time, he wasnāt ever as good as Dick and thatās part of his established character, Dick is well aware on Timās feelings on Robin, just because one character views Robin in a certain way doesnāt mean another will.
Plus Dick knows and cares about Tim. Heās protective over him. He shoved him out of trouble, technically killed the Joker when he thought he had killed Tim. This is a person who cares a lot about Tim who is his little brother. He isnāt a personality who would just not think about him when theyāre both grieving over the same man.
So why does it make sense that Tim would be kicked from Robin in the first place that isnāt contrived?
Who said that Damian needed to specifically need Robin besides what they wrote to validate it?
Itās accepted now because of what they wrote to validate it, but just because they suddenly did it and validated after. Doesnāt mean it made sense or worked.
When by this point they establish that Robin is there to keep Batman level headed, and Damian clearly isnāt going to keep Dick that way. Thereās nothing much more than superficial reasons as to why Damian was Robin in the first place.
Not to invalidate Damianās character, because the thing about Damianās character compared to Tim is, Damian was made to be Damian, he doesnāt need Robin to work, Tim does.
Nothing really meant Damian HAD to be Robin. He needed a guiding hand and some training. Someone to love him. Robin isnāt needing for that.
If Tim wasnāt ever a thing, of course I think Dick would make Damian Robin, but the thing isā Tim WAS there, and Dick has too many feelings and personal connection for Tim that makes seemingly ignoring him make sense. Especially when the writers oh so suddenly decided to make Tim equal to Dick, when that doesnāt make any logical sense. Dick may view Robin as one thing, but he isnāt one to just ignore Timās feelings on the subject as well. Which makes a lot of difference.
As in, with no Tim, itās only Dickās feelings on Robin to go after, and while Dick did make Robin, his personality is a caring one, and he is shown caring a lot and being protective over Tim. Which means thatād he would also consider Timās feelings more likely than not. Especially when considering Timās clearly very mentally weak. Dickās the person Tim would call when Tim was depressed, he wouldnāt not know how Tim would feel or treat his feelings as lesser.
In a real world situation, when you have a compassionate person who loves and cares about someone, in a situation involving grief like this, youāre going to take consideration of their feelings to make them feel good.
Damian is there as well, but as said before, nothing specifically meant he had to be Robin. They used a superficial rule rather than using character logic, which isnāt where good writing comes from.
A lot of the people that weirdly get very defensive at people wanting Tim to remain Robin, always use what was written to validate it, while not considering that some people genuinely donāt like the decision, because it goes against whatās already been seen.
Unless you stretch your imagination to make it seem like Dick didnāt care about Tim or some how forgot a very important thing about a person heās very protective about, or what the established point of a Robin is, it doesnāt make much sense.
(Someones probably gonna look too deep into why I used that screenshot, but it just fit the tone the best.)
Then thereās the assumption that itās regression for Tim.
That doesnāt make a lot of sense to me.
Because so much of his character depended on Robin, that heās been lesser ever sense. At least to a large extent.
Nothing logically make sense about Tim getting a new identity being an actual promotion.
Tim was a character developed to just be plain Robin. He was specifically designed to be the best Robin he could be, and thatās how his character was made, and who he was made to be. A ton of stuff about him was made for him to be ROBIN.
Tim no longer being Robin doesnāt equal bigger and better things, because thereās nothing with substance that says itās any better.
To put it simply, Tim has flopped since not being Robin, because he wasnāt made to be anything but Robin. His depth, and stories, depended on Robin.
Dick after they aged him up after the cheesy era was developed to stand on his own, practically a different version of himself from the silver age because standards had changed. Him having his own identity wasnāt going to destroy Dick, when at that point, he was more of his own character than the typical ideal of a sidekick.
Meaning that Robin was Dick Grayson, Robin as it stood as a single personās identity before DC worried about branding, was just Dick in a costume. The specific identity of Robin would not change a thing about Dick besides name and appearance.
Timās character was developed to be attached to the hip with Robin. His character isnāt nearly as strong without Robin, because unlike Dick where Robin depended on him, Tim depends on Robin.
Tim was made to be a sidekick. He could stand on his own of course, he did have a solo. But a lot of his solo was based on how he was Batmanās sidekick. That worry of disappointing him. Being kicked from being Robin. Not being good enough to be Robin. Not being good as the others. Robin is so much more a part of Timās character than any of the other Robins.
Take Tim away from Robin, and heās not much. Seeing how Red Robin is based on a very specific reason and time frame, as well as not being as well written as people assume, Tim just flops.
None of that even means Tim is a bad character. It just means heās a victim of having what made his character worked be taken away.
You make Indiana Jones and take him away from hunting artifacts and he wouldnāt be much either, but that doesnāt mean heās a bad character. Heās just made for stories in a certain way.
When Jason became the Red Hood as well, so much time had passed that he didnāt depend on Robin, and he didnāt depend on Robin as much in the first place. He was made to be Jason, his character wasnāt dependent on Robin either, it was dependent on him being Jason Todd, angsty street kid, who needed more help than he allowed himself to get.
So the reason why itās specifically Tim that a good deal of fans want to be Robin again, is that because he was so specifically made to be Robin, itās just when his character works best, and how he even became something else wasnāt even well-written to begin with. He was taken away from what made him work.
Compared to every single of the other Robins, Tim being taken away from Robin takes away depth more than what it gives, because of how Tim was developed compared to them. Tim has the angst of it being taken away, but then what? They just completely changed his character from thought processes, to morals, to general personality. He doesnāt succeed.Ā
Now that Tim is past that story and all: Who is he and what keeps him interesting?
Red Robin depended on people really buying into his mental breakdown to accept that Tim is more different then ever before. Even Geoff Johnsās Tim who already wasnāt doing the best representing the character.
When the circumstances that made the change in identity is contrived at it is when taking it all in, it doesnāt help it out either.
People will villainize Dick for taking away Robin from Tim I notice, but to me, it just wasnāt in-character to begin with.
I donāt understand the logic of assuming every piece of writing was well-written just because it stuck, because a lot of the time for the past to decades given the standards of DC changing, it just isnāt.
Tim as Red Robin wasnāt the success people think it is. Itās popular in fandom, but it wasnāt a true success. It was something that the readers of really liked, but wasnāt something that caught the worldās imagination. Timās former fanbase had left, because you donāt get much out of not truly feeling like youāre reading your favorite character. You expect a dorky, insecure, Robin, and get an angsty, brainiac, loner, and that change only happened through contrived means: A lot of people wonāt like that.
Red Robin as a series made Tim the opposite of who he was and developed to be, based on the logic that Tim Drake, a kid who is actually seen in his own series as working past his grief because heās naturally hopeful things will get better, would have a mental breakdown so great that he isnāt the same personality anymore.
Now that Tim is past that era: Who is he now? What makes him interesting? Where does his depth come from?
Heās a character taken away from what made him tick and work.
That isnāt good character writing. When you give a character in a situation, you have to naturally build on whatās developed about them. Red Robin was written on doing the opposite of that. Hence why a lot of people who knew Tim before hand, didnāt like it.
Why donāt people like serial killer Jason? Cause it was contrived, didnāt go with the natural development of the character, and made you have to really raise your suspension of disbelief to believe that heād actually go that mad, after already seeing that he only kills criminals.
For Tim, his success came as Robin, his character was made to be Robin, so his character worked best as Robin.
The idea that itās regression for Tim to become Robin again makes the assumption that him not being Robin made him better, but it didnāt. It took away from him as a character. He couldnāt function properly because of how he was built.
Having another identity doesnāt naturally mean heās a better character. Thatās a contrived notion people made because Dick had become a better character as Nightwing, as well as Jason.
The same thing isnāt going to work for everyone, and it didnāt work for Tim.
You canāt naturally assume, just because you only read what happened after, that what happened in the first place was well-written and a good idea.
And thereās nothing to say you canāt enjoy Red Robin.
Itās just that thereās a lot of reasons why Tim going back to Robin is actually a good thing for him.
Just because heās Robin again doesnāt mean he canāt grow as a character. Tim was more when he was Robin. Robin doesnāt equal no more growth. Itās the position Timās best at, heās still a person, and being a person heāll grow no matter what. With Robin, it just makes him a fuller character again, and regain his purpose of what he was built for and had most of his popularity with, because he worked best there, and hasnāt worked as well without it.
When you have a job, in the position you wanted, and the position youāre best at, and feel like youāre made for, and you get kicked from it, you wonāt feel like youāve grown, you had something taken away from you and then youāre less.
Tim being Robin again, is only going to add to his character.Ā Make him feel more like how he was meant to be. And make him a more functioning character with a purpose.
Tim being Robin is a good thing.