She Devoured Men The Way She Devoured Cigarettes

Well, I didn’t know that. I actually want to vomit. I loved sidney my whole life. And unfortunately, people will continue to defend Douglas. I’ll be looking into that later for sure. 

People are continuously linking/referring to this article to prove Kirk’s innocence or whatever on here and twitter. I’m sorry but regardless of what RDjr said, this is not the reason as to why the classic hollywood community and Natalie fans alike, are accusing him of being a rapist.

I’ve been on this site for well over a decade, enveloped in Classic Hollywood cinema and drama, galore! I’ve heard it all. I’ve read soooo many books, articles, etc. on many of my favourite stars and you bet your ass, this case was talked about to DEATH at one stage when I was most active on this site.

You are correct in saying that Natalie never accused him. Why? I can’t actually believe I have to explain why but here we go...She was a 16 year old child, this was 1956 when it happened during an interview at Chateau Marmont. She confided in her mother on the drive home that she was raped repeatedly for hours. It was her mother who told her not to piss off her rapist.

Her sister has spoken of that attack a few times. She knows who did it, as does Suzanne Finstad (author of her bio). Both women said they will reveal the rapist’s name after he dies.

How do we know it was Kirk though? We know that there were apparently 3 Hollywood actors at that meeting...John Wayne, Kirk Douglas and ??? (I actually can’t remember who but I THINK it was Burt Lancaster). Both men are dead, they never came forward to say it was either of them after their deaths. That leaves Kirk Douglas.

To add to this, I read a long time ago that Dennis Hopper and Jackie Estes accused him of raping her. They actually named him. Whether she confided in them at some stage or not, I’m not sure of. But as far as I can remember, he never defended himself or denied it.We know from the man himself that he liked brutal sex, that he physically abused women, and that he liked young girls. You can argue that none of that makes someone exclusively a rapist but he sounds like a sick fuck to me.

Jean Spangler too because the moron (Kirk) rang the police to say it wasn’t him. The police never suspected it was him in the first place. The whole story is on her wiki if you want a brief read. Did I also mention that she’s been missing for 70 years?

So please. Continue to defend him. Go search for proof of a 1950′s rape case. Even if you truly, deeply believe he is not a rapist, don’t forget his own admittance in his book over his vile and abusive behaviour towards women.

Don’t message me again. Anything you want to read is online. Visit Natalie Wood blogs and ask questions, they are far more equipped to explain the details than I am, that’s for sure.

Can you show me where I have said anything to give you or anyone that opinion? Because I’m sure you’ll find me not being all too kind about him at all and referring to him as ‘goblin’ or ‘trash’. It’s all in my FAQ if you or anyone wants to take a look.

I’m pointing out the obvious here but Roman was part of Sharon’s life and I can’t help that. I can’t help that she decided to marry him. I can’t help that he is pretty much in 50% of her photos taken during the time they dated and during their marriage. 

***Keep in mind, the rape case came 8 years after her death and that has absolutely nothing to do with her or this fan page.***

I have said in the past that I like many of his films but I never expressed my admiration or respect for him as a person. Seriously wtf, I’m not Kim Cattrall?

I think it’s important that I make all this clear and that me posting images of Sharon and Roman together is not me ‘romanticising’ him. That’s completely ridiculous. 

I will not stop posting photos of Sharon with him. I am also not forcing anyone to reblog or like any photos with him in them, I couldn’t care less.

I’m genuinely glad you asked me this but I would have appreciated it more if you rephrased that question more sensibly. There are a few actual Roman fan blogs on tumblr and I wonder if you or anyone asked them the same question? I mean, it’s pretty clear what this blog is about and I can’t really make that any clearer.

Also a side note - There are a couple of blogs that like to put ‘Roman is a rapist’ under my Sharon photos. It hasn’t happened for a good while but just stop? We know what he is but I only care about celebrating Sharon and I’m happy to see so many of you share the same sentiments.

*ALSO just realising this was asked on my personal blog - wtf. Will be reblogging to my Sharon fan page.*