Grace jones

@theartofmadeline
hello vonnie
Noah Kahan
YOU ARE THE REASON
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Origami Around

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

Love Begins
taylor price
todays bird
macklin celebrini has autism

romaâ

blake kathryn
NASA
The Bowery Presents
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Interview Vampire Daily
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Pakistan
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from Germany
seen from United States
@scifijew
Grace jones

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Plum Cloutman - Self Pie, 2025 - Pastel, watercolor, and oil on paper mounted to board
Can anyone recommend some entry level behaviours? Thinking of getting into being
PĂĄdraig Ă Tuama, Kitchen Hymns
a few indian brutalist buildings

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
happy franz kafka peach embarrassment day
everyone remember to eat a peach for franz 2day #peaches4franz
TĂš.Ăşk'z v2
realm of absurd hope
[I]n colonial zoological literatures between 1870 and 1935. This was the historic period of colonial zoologistsâ speculation about [âŚ] the whereabouts of the last Palestinian crocodile. [âŚ] [T]he Palestinian crocodile extinction story is intertwined with violent histories of colonial resource extraction, racialized labor exploitation, and indigenous human dispossession. [âŚ]
Clarence the crocodile drifts about lazily in the thick summer heat [âŚ] at the [âŚ] Zoological Gardens in West Jerusalem [âŚ]. Nile crocodiles once lived in Palestineâs Mediterranean coastal marshlands. The poster narrates [âŚ]: âIn 1905, the last crocodile was hunted in Israel by residents of [the Palestinian village] Jisar-A-Zarka.â [âŚ] [T]he market for late Ottoman Palestineâs small and dwindling crocodile population was overwhelmingly driven by colonialists [âŚ]. [T]he [âŚ] zoo poster implies that Palestinians were responsible for Nile crocodilesâ regional extinction. This historical narrative hinges on the last crocodileâs symbolic singularity [âŚ]. Several âlast Palestinian crocodilesâ â that is, crocodiles hunted when the local population was at the brink of extinction â remain to this day in British, German, and Israeli collections. The last Palestinian crocodile, therefore, is a dynamic rhetorical figure rather than a singular specimen. [âŚ]
â
[We can] contextualize [âŚ] the colonial scientific archive with Palestinian-authored scholarship from this historic period, as well as [âŚ] interviews with local [Palestinian] historians [âŚ] By tracing the last Palestinian crocodileâs rhetorical circulation to 1935 â when an [Israeli] zoologist declared that Palestinian crocodiles were finally extinct â [we can] connect the story of Palestinian crocodile extinction with the British Mandate and Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (PJCA)-led drainage and destruction of the crocodileâs former habitat and the dispossession of the Ghawarna who lived on that land. [âŚ] [I]t was only after the wetlands were drained that the PJCA transferred the Ghawarna community to Jisr al-Zarqa, newly created on a fraction of the Ghawarnaâs [âŚ] lands. [âŚ]
â
The freshwater Nahr al-Zarqa, known for its clear blue waters, was used for drinking and agriculture. [âŚ] The marshlands themselves were home to two communities of Bedouin origin, âArab Kabbara and âArab al-Ghawarna [âŚ]. âArab al-Ghawarna roughly translates to âpeople of the lowlandsâ or âmarshes.â For reasons of social status intertwined with their marshland dwelling-place, the name carries a fraught and at times stigmatized history. The Ghawarna who lived in the Zor al-Zarqa/Kabbara marshlands were primarily members of the âAmmash and Jurban families. As recounted to me by the local historian Mohamad Hamdan and the environmental and community activist Saidah alAli â who live in Jisr al-Zarqa [âŚ] â the Ghawarna earned a living [âŚ] weaving mats from the marshâs abundant supple, springy reeds. [âŚ]
Palestinians of Sudanese descent were also affiliated with the Ghawarna during this period. [âŚ] Their [âŚ] âdarknessâ [âŚ] was the subject of repeated, disproportionate fascination in the writings of colonial researchers who came to hunt crocodiles and document marshland flora and fauna. [âŚ]
â
The relationship between imperial science, natural resource extraction, and territorial expansionism during the late Ottoman and British Mandate periods is well-documented. [âŚ] Why did Palestinian crocodiles â especially the last crocodile â attract so much attention from colonialists? What did they find so intriguing about this small, localized, and rapidly dwindling (if not entirely extinct) population? [âŚ]
Lastness [âŚ]. Colonial zoologistsâ fixation on the last Palestinian crocodile was in part driven by an enduring European fascination with âlastnessâ as a spatial-temporal construct. This fascination exemplifies the convergence of evolutionary science and imperial sensibilities [âŚ]. [I]t converged with the myth of âthe last of the raceâ and an enduring fascination with the ârise and fallâ of civilizations. [âŚ] [T]hese sentiments [âŚ] were often cloaked in an air of âimperialist nostalgia.â [âŚ]
Scarcity [âŚ]. The interlocking relationship between imperial science, capitalist exploitation, and racist dehumanization is apparent in an 1887 PEQ article by the Templer German-American researcher Gottlieb Schumacher. Schumacher did not merely represent the Ghawarna as existing outside the circuits of capital. To him, they were capital. [âŚ]
Place [âŚ]. Palestinian crocodilesâ popularity among Europeans was heightened by place-based historical associations. The crocodiles were associated by name with several archeological and geographic sites near their habitat which were connected to Hellenistic and medieval Crusader histories in Palestine. These sites included the ruins of the Greco-Roman port city Crocodilopolis and the nearby river Nahr alZarqa, which during the Greco-Roman period was allegedly known as Crocodeilon. The ruins and river attracted a broad spectrum of nineteenth- and twentieth-century Europeans [âŚ]. Through their excavation and representation of Palestinian crocodilesâ placebased historical associations, colonialists perpetuated a Eurocentric interpretation of Palestineâs material history.Â
The crocodile served as a reptilian conduit for rewriting â and claiming ownership over â Palestineâs past, thereby de-Arabizing the history of the coastal marshlands. [âŚ]
â
Nearly a century has passed since Bodenheimer proclaimed the Palestinian crocodileâs extinction, obscuring the violent processes of Palestinian dispossession and ecological destruction.
â
All text above by: Elizabeth Bentley, âBetween Extinction and Dispossession: A Rhetorical Historiography of the Last Palestinian Crocodile (1870-1935),â Jerusalem Quarterly, Issue 88 (Winter 2021). Published by Institute for Palestine Studies. DOI: doi. org /10.70190 /jq.188.pg [Bold emphasis and some paragraph breaks/contractions added by me. Presented here for commentary, teaching, criticism.]
oh oo ohhh ooo oh
This is a cable motif 52 rows high, that starts and ends with 19 stitches.
Everything is distracting chaos around here, and likely to stay that way until the holidays are over. I've hastily uploaded the snake cable pattern to Ravelry, and am probably going to disappear from the internet until visiting relatives have gone back home. If I have time, though, I'll see if I can wade through the storefront interface enough to figure out how to enable a discount code of some sort.
The flaming sword probably won't go up until after the new year, and I'm planning to do some kind of deal if you buy them both at once. So you may want to hold off on buying this thing for now.
Okay, now the code TWENTY-THREE should get you 23% off until the end of the year. Wooooo!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Industry says governmentâs failure to address cooling demands means AI growth plans are âfatally flawedâ
âThere appears to be an assumption that the country will always have enough water for its economic needs,â the briefing said. âNothing could be further from the truth.â In May, a House of Lords report said England faced a 5bn litre a day shortfall for public water supplies by 2055. Water UK said datacentres were already being built in water-stressed areas, with more than three-quarters located in the south and east of England. Millions of people in these regions have been placed under a hosepipe ban by water companies after prolonged extreme heat and lack of rainfall.
[...]
The government has designated datacentres as critical national infrastructure, on the basis that their loss or compromise could result in âmajor detrimental impact on the availability, integrity or delivery of essential servicesâ and âsignificant impact on national security, national defence, or the functioning of the stateâ. Oliver Hayes, head of big tech and campaigns at the campaign group Global Action Plan, said it was not clear why datacentres had been given this status, but that water companies may be powerless to restrict their water use as a result. This could risk datacentres being prioritised over households at times of peak water demand. âI think it is highly likely that weâre going to end up seeing datacentres that are actually running chatbots, or enabling people to do benign and very wasteful, pointless things, protected and given favourable treatment when it comes to resources,â Hayes said.
21 July 2026
1. After The Pale, The World Again 2. All Distances Are Insurmountable 3. Here We Go Mother On The Shipless Ocean 4. After The World, The Pale
Mia Novakova, Porch Collapse
"dad's kitchen," amy bradstreet (2008)
i should invent a bicycle with square wheels that cant move and take it to the tour de france and spend 24 hrs at the starting line trying to pedal it while in full aerodynamic posture and at some point ill tip over and bust the frame to which my highly dedicated and sponsored team quickly brings out another square wheeled bike
calvino

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Amnesty International backing down (hiding its report) when threatened with JKR's lawsuits just shows how weak the liberal human rights framework really is. It never seems to flinch when governments criticize it, but the moment an influential Westerner pushes back, it suddenly loses its nerve.
It likely also has to do with the difference between UK and US libel law.
In the US, true statements are never libelous (or slanderous). Further, since Rowling is a public figure, she would have to prove that Amnesty International acted with reckless disregard for the truth (with "actual malice").
In the UK, as far as I can tell, true statements can be libelous.
I suspect Amnesty International did the calculus of "How many people have already seen this? Will they keep circulating the tapes? How much will it cost us to defend this? Can we successfully defend it under UK law?" and decided that Streisand-effect-ing the report would be a better use of their time and money.
Somehow, I don't buy that
i don't disagree that rights-based campaigning is liberal and tends towards stasis, but libel law and its misuses in the uk are a genuine and well documented issue that has been used to financially destroy or harrass people ranging from investigative journalists to victims of sexual assault/harrassment - and particularly on the investigative front, the uk is well known for libel tourism where billionaires use its extremely loose definitions re. libel/slander & the burden of proof lying with the defendant to prove that they were reporting the truth, to shut down investigations into corruption and human rights abuses across the world. in that regard jkr is using a tool provided to her by the law, thru the services provided for the rich to protect their interests, and must be seen in that light. in amnesty's case, the question they face is whether or not their funding reserves will withstand being taken to court by a billionaire who has publicly encouraged all the named orgs to bring defamation suits in english courts. if carole cadwallader ended up on the hook for 1 million pounds in damages, despite a court ruling in her favour re. public interest, how much more so a case bankrolled by this much money?
However! In UK libel law, truth is a valid and complete defense since 2013. All you need to do is prove that the content is true to win. This may have been tricky in Banks v Cadwalladr mentioned above, since the claims were along the lines of association with certain national interests (difficult to prove), but if you've read the report you can see that unlike that case, the information in the Amnesty report is quite easily verifiable. The majority of it relies on public tax records anyone can access.
It's true that historically truth wasn't a complete defense, you used to have to prove things like that the disclosure was in the public interest instead, which led to some bad outcomes. But now truth is a complete defense -- you don't need to supplement it with anything else, just show that it's true.
Amnesty International UK are not a tiny helpless charity, either. They had an annual income of ÂŁ24,142,000 in 2024, and during the same year spent over ÂŁ6 million just on fundraising. We don't have a more open financial record, but my cousin used to work in the London office (which she left because of racist harassement and the company having an open bar at every office party funded by donations...) , so I know that they spend a large number of those donations on school campaigns, raising awareness (not counted as direct fundraising), etc.
This would be a better use of their money and they should go for it. They can still get sued for defamation even though they've withdrawn the report, so now this is just a huge bargaining chip the gender critical movement will hold over their heads for the rest of time. Any time Amnesty want to do anything anti-trans, the same legal threats can be used to cow them into silence. So, not only have they allowed their report to be withdrawn, they've effectively decided not to pursue trans rights in the UK anymore. They're being cowards.
Amnesty International backing down (hiding its report) when threatened with JKR's lawsuits just shows how weak the liberal human rights framework really is. It never seems to flinch when governments criticize it, but the moment an influential Westerner pushes back, it suddenly loses its nerve.
It likely also has to do with the difference between UK and US libel law.
In the US, true statements are never libelous (or slanderous). Further, since Rowling is a public figure, she would have to prove that Amnesty International acted with reckless disregard for the truth (with "actual malice").
In the UK, as far as I can tell, true statements can be libelous.
I suspect Amnesty International did the calculus of "How many people have already seen this? Will they keep circulating the tapes? How much will it cost us to defend this? Can we successfully defend it under UK law?" and decided that Streisand-effect-ing the report would be a better use of their time and money.
Somehow, I don't buy that
i don't disagree that rights-based campaigning is liberal and tends towards stasis, but libel law and its misuses in the uk are a genuine and well documented issue that has been used to financially destroy or harrass people ranging from investigative journalists to victims of sexual assault/harrassment - and particularly on the investigative front, the uk is well known for libel tourism where billionaires use its extremely loose definitions re. libel/slander & the burden of proof lying with the defendant to prove that they were reporting the truth, to shut down investigations into corruption and human rights abuses across the world. in that regard jkr is using a tool provided to her by the law, thru the services provided for the rich to protect their interests, and must be seen in that light. in amnesty's case, the question they face is whether or not their funding reserves will withstand being taken to court by a billionaire who has publicly encouraged all the named orgs to bring defamation suits in english courts. if carole cadwallader ended up on the hook for 1 million pounds in damages, despite a court ruling in her favour re. public interest, how much more so a case bankrolled by this much money?