Another semi-coherent rant on climate change, the value of idealism, and TGCF (I finally finished!)
Well, I finished Tian Guan Ci Fu. And, oh man, if you read my last post, youâll know that I was terrified that the entire novel would be a criticism of blind idealism. But I am SO glad I was wrong!!! Looking back on what I wrote before⌠itâs kind of hilarious how worried I was. I was so sure that I knew where it was going, was so busy preparing myself to be offended/emotionally crushed, that I wouldnât even entertain the idea that maybe MXTX had a similar worldview to me all along.
In my defense, aside from the line, âSomething like saving the common people⌠although foolish, it is brave,â everything seemed to point toward the idea that trying to do good is pointless. I mean, up until the moment when Xie Lian was lying with a sword in his chest on the streets of Yongâan, all of his efforts to do good had essentially been in vain. He hadnât been able to help anyone.
And then, when the one guy stopped and gave Xie Lian his hat, I dunno, I just cried. It was so perfect! Like, ugh, damn you, MXTX! So sneaky⌠destroying us, just to bring us back later!! It was such a small, insignificant win, but it was exactly what Xie Lian (and I) needed. I love the line, âJust one person was enough!â Just one person doing something selfless. Itâs enough to give us hope.  Â
It really resonates with me because I think a lot about how to maintain hope. In terms of the climate crisis, I feel like Xie Lianâcompletely powerless. I want to stop eating meat, use less plastic, spend more time on environmental activism, but honestly, what do any of these things matter? The meat industry is not going to change because I choose to stop consuming. Even my activism has a completely negligible effectâwhether or not I join a protest or write a letter to my congressman will almost certainly not be the deciding factor for any climate legislation, no matter how much effort I put in. Â
And yet, I still want to. I love the moment when Xie Lian chooses to get stabbed over and over rather than create a second plague of Human Face Disease, and White No-Face asks him in shock, âWhy??ââas in, why would you ever do that? And Xie Lian responds: âI donât have a reasonâjust because I want to! Even if I explained it to you⌠Useless trash like you wouldnât understand.â This line is so great. Xie Lian canât explain it to White No-Face, because, in truth, it isnât entirely logical. It canât be explained by reason. I want to do my measly, unimportant part to help the world⌠because I want to. Because it feels right. Because itâs my way of keeping my heart, of maintaining faith that there is some good in this world worth upholding. (As an aside, I love how the English title of the live action dramaâwhich we may never get to see, God damn censorship!!!!âis called âEternal Faith.â Of course it refers to Hua Cheng and Xie Lianâs faith in each other, but I think it also means having eternal faith in the value of doing good, despite centuries of experience that seem to show its pointlessness.)
As I talked about in my last post, if you zoom out far enough, nothing really seems to matter. Everything we love and care about will one day be gone. And yet, I believe we still have to act like it matters. This is the basic tenant of existentialism, and I think MXTX portrays this philosophical paradox really beautifully.
Itâs funny, because I think MXTX has a lot of profound things to say, but in an interview I read, she warned against viewing her work too deeply, saying, âI am not a guru.â I get that she may not want the responsibility of giving people spiritual advice, but I do think she presents some really fascinating, really novel, philosophical ideas. So, sorry MXTX, but Iâm about to analyze TGCF like itâs a piece of freakin scripture. Soo here we goâŚ
The main theme she comes back to again and again is that fortune is limited, so the only way you can do good for others is by taking fortune from somebody else. Which leads the characters to a bunch of ethically impossible choices: the people of Yongâan and the people of Xianle canât all be saved (Xie Lian must choose who to help), neither can the people of Wuyong and the surrounding kingdoms (Prince of Wuyong must choose), and Shi Wudu canât save his brother from a tragic fate without taking fortune from an innocent person. When the characters try to avoid choosing, and try to âplay Godâ by creating a âthird path,â it just invites disaster.
But is this really true? Is fortune actually limited? Itâs an idea that reminds me of Buddhism and Daoism, but also seems kind of revolutionary⌠(I like to think I know something about Chinese philosophy but it could certainly be a thing and I donât know). I donât believe in fate, but I do believe in limited resources, and the idea that nature tends toward balance. I think conceiving of it this way, as a pool of fortune, is really interesting.  Â
It reminds me of this Meme:
In other words, who is the protagonist and who is the villain is entirely based on perspective. And, according to the laws of nature, we all must survive by eating others, or causing others to starve (i.e. avoiding being eaten).
I tried to think if this is really true in all areas of life. Iâm a teacher, and one of the ways I convince myself that I am doing good in the world is by helping my studentsâpreparing them well for college so that they can get into good schools and follow their dreams. But then, is this just taking fortune from others? If I do prepare my students well, and as a result they all get into top universities, does that mean they are taking spots away from other students? Am I simply just helping âmy own,â at the expense of others?
One place where I see this concept play out very clearly is with our modern, industrialized society. As I mentioned in my last post, we live in a world of abundance. Most of us have enough food to eat, live in houses with electricity and running water, and donât worry about a whole host of diseases endured by our ancestors. It seems we have done what Xie Lian couldnâtâwe have expanded the well of fortune for most of humanity.
But this fortune wasnât spontaneously created. It was taken from other species. It was borrowed against our own future, when climate change will likely destroy this world of abundance we have created, causing untold suffering. In truth, when it comes to prosperity, there is no such thing as a free lunch. Â Â
Even now, when we ought to be enjoying our fortune, most of us are not happy. We want other things. We take food, clothing, and shelter for granted, creating even bigger, more lofty demandsâa bigger car, a better house, a machine thatâs sole purpose is to make bread. In fact, it seems like whenever we make things âbetter,â the goalposts just move. I recently read a book called Four Thousand Weeks: Time Management for Mortals, which mentioned that with the advent of washing machines and vacuum cleaners, everyone assumed there would be more free time. Yet, the real outcome was that standards of cleanliness just changed. Suddenly, people expected you to wear fresh clothes every day and have a perfectly dust-free home, which meant spending just as much time cleaning as in the past. Â Â Â Â
And according to psychologists, getting what we want doesnât really make us happier. Instead, something like getting a promotion causes our happiness to spike, before it quickly returns to baseline. The psychologist Dan Gilbert writes that the purpose of our emotions is to act like a compassâto tell us which direction to go in. If you feel good, you can continue the way you are going. If you feel bad, you should probably turnâmake a change. But if you get what you want and become permanently happy, your compass is now broken. Itâs stuck in one direction and becomes useless.
All of this is very Buddhist, of course. Suffering is not caused by our external circumstances, but our desire to change them.
Like I said, I donât necessarily believe in âfateâ or âfortune.â But I believe this all points to something deeper that MXTX is getting at: which is that we cannot fundamentally make a better world, for the common people, or for anyone. This idea of âbetterâ doesnât really exist. The world is as it is. Trying to alter that is like playing God. And like Xie Lian says, âIn this world, there are no true godsâŚâ Â
So, what do we do? How can we survive this absurdist tragedy of life? I donât think we can just throw up our hands and not give a shitâthat way lies depression and Jun Wu-style cruelty. We cannot lose our heart. But we also canât try to fix everything.
One thing I find a bit difficult about MXTX is she is very clear about the impossible situations our characters find themselves in, but not really clear about the solution. She seems critical of the charactersâ actions (Iâm thinking also of Wei Wuxian here), but what exactly does she think they should have done? In other words, what is the point?
I spent a long time thinking about this. And I realized that Xie Lian was able to get back on his feet, find happiness and make peace with himself. How did he do this? Ultimately, I see Xie Lianâs solution as having three parts: self-sacrifice, gratitude, and purpose. Which all sounds very academic and maybe not that profound on an emotional level. But hear me out. Because, in the end, I think these choices are incredibly beautiful. They are the kind of thing that make me feel like reading TGCF was actually a spiritual experience, no matter what MXTX says. That makes me admire Xie Lian and want to follow him (like the God he is).
Okay so first: self-sacrifice. If fortune is limited, and the only way to make othersâ lives better is to take fortune from someplace else, then there is really only one place you can take it from without hurting othersâyourself.
So, part of Xie Lianâs solution is to take fortune from himself and give it to others. Itâs why he asks for a cursed shackle that disperses his fortune, so that his fortune will naturally flow to those around him. Itâs, of course, a very small thing. He is no longer playing God, or trying to âfixâ the world on a grand scale. He is simply, in his own, quiet way, serving the common people.
My desire to give up meat and to spend more time on activismâthese things feel like big sacrifices for me. And yet, they will have a very small impact on the greater situation in the world. Theyâre a drop in the ocean. I still want to do it, but itâs hard. Itâs hard to care, or think that these things matter. Yet, this is the trade-off Xie Lian was willing to make. I really admire him for it. Â Â
I believe self-sacrifice is actually a really important, beautiful thing, that our society has forgotten the value of. We are individualisticâobsessed with our own wants. As I mentioned previously, our expectations have risen, so we buy and buy and buy. We are unwilling to rein in our consumption. I know a lot of people baulk at lifestyle changes as a solution to the climate crisis, and I agree that putting pressure on individuals instead of governments or corporations is misguided. But, first of all, there simply arenât enough resources on earth to sustain our current levels of consumption. And, second⌠I donât think we can completely let individuals off the hook. What is society anyway, but a collection of individuals? If we are going to address this thing, itâs going to take a massive movementâbigger than the civil rights movement or the worksâ rights movement or the womenâs movement. Itâs going to take millions of people worldwide getting out of their own heads, their own lives, and concerning themselves with the greater good. That requires immense sacrifice.
Which takes me to gratitude. In order to be willing to sacrifice, you have to appreciate what you already have.
People often talk about gratitude these days as a path to mental health. Instinctively, it sounds like an uplifting, positive thing. And it is⌠but it also entails having a relatively negative worldview. It means remembering all the horrible things that exist in this world which we are lucky enough to avoid on a daily basis. You stepped in some dog shit? Well, that sucks, but you could have stepped into an open manhole and broken your neck! So! Thatâs something to be grateful for. Â
We are all so lucky. Iâm sure everyone reading this has pains and traumas and challenges. This isnât to diminish those, but, I hope, at least we all have at least one person to love. Thatâs all Hua Cheng had, and itâs what kept him going. Just one person was enough. And most of us, I hope, get to eat food every day, get to sleep in a bed, get to play video games or read novels or write poetry when we are sad. Not everyone gets those things. Â
Xie Lian, of course, was the king of low expectations, because he knew his future was going to be bad. He had intentionally accepted bad luck for a lifetime. So, there was no point in hoping for things to get better.
I think this attitude is best shown by his interaction with the Venerable of Empty words. The Venerable of Empty Words feeds off peopleâs fears. But Xie Lian didnât really have any. When the Venerable of Empty Words warned him that his hut will collapse in two months, his response is, âTwo months? If itâs still standing in seven days, then itâll be a real miracle.â Because his expectations are so low, heâs essentially immune to fear. I canât help but think that if you could really think this way, it would be a kind of superpower. It reminds me of the famous quote by spiritual teacher Krishnamurti, âDo you know what my secret is? You see, I donât mind what happens.â
And so Xie Lian is okay with everything. He can sleep anywhere, crash boulders on his chest for money, not eat for three days, regularly suffer corpse poisoning, and still be okay.
Which leads to my third point: purpose. Xie Lian is able to endure such hardship because his expectations are low, but also he knows all his suffering has a purpose. âIf I am to become a God of misfortune, then so be it,â he says. âAs long as I know deep down that I am not.â He is okay with being laughed at or avoided for his bad luck, because deep down he knows he is doing the right thing. People can withstand a great deal if they feel their suffering has meaning. In Manâs Search for Meaning, the psychiatrist Victor Franklâs writes about the horrors of living through a concentration camp, and how over and over, it was creating purpose that allowed him, and others, to find motivation to survive. Which I think has an important lesson for self-sacrifice. People are willing to sacrifice a lot, if they feel their sacrifice has purpose.
I get it when MXTX says that she is not a guru, and maybe itâs a lot to ask of a danmei novel to take spiritual advice from it. The book wasnât necessarily perfect, and I do have some critiques (which I was gonna add here, but this thing is already wayyy too long). But⌠I do think I found something really meaningful in this storyâsome inspiration. I want to follow Xie Lianâs example, and live with gratitude and acceptance, while keeping my faith in doing the right thing. In other words, WWXLD! (What Would Xie Lian Do?)