
Discoholic đŞŠ
Peter Solarz
One Nice Bug Per Day
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
NASA

pixel skylines
Noah Kahan
hello vonnie
h
wallacepolsom

blake kathryn
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
tumblr dot com

â
d e v o n
untitled
art blog(derogatory)

#extradirty

oozey mess


seen from Italy
seen from Syria

seen from Syria

seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Singapore

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
seen from China

seen from Australia

seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@ratatattatas

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
a funny thing about having conversations with people within institutions (academic in this case but also others) about gatekeeping, is that you end up having a conversation over and over in which you're like, "hey this alligator spike pit moat you have erected around your institution is keeping a lot of people out," and they're like, "well *I* navigated the alligator spike pit moat just fine," and you're like, "right. by dint of us having this conversation, you within the institution and me without, it is understood that you navigated the alligator spike pit moat. due to that being an inherent requirement of entering the institution," and they're like, "I don't think you understand the prestigious history of our alligator spike pit moat," and you're like, "is there a reason why there needs to be an alligator spike pit moat encircling the concept of higher education?" and they're like, "look, the alligator spike pit moat isn't for everyone. some people just aren't cut out for the alligator spike pit moat :)" and you're like, "right, yeah, like disabled people and people coming from poverty or unstable home environments or underserved communities or people dealing with difficult to navigate life events like pregnancy or abuse or prison or addiction or the death of a loved one, for example" and they're like, "how dare you imply that we are keeping those people out on purpose. it's their own problem if they can't wrestle the alligators and avoid the spikes while also disabled and/or poor and/or pregnant etc" and you're like, "well that seems evil," and they're like, "it sounds like maybe you're just bitter about the alligator spike pit moat because of your totally random individual experience with ONE bad alligator spike pit moat. have you considered therapy?" and you're like, "did you know that there's some patterns here in terms of how y'all are handling this stuff?" and they're like, "actually yes. we even have a department of alligator spike pit studies :)" and you're like, "that's great, how do I get access to and participate in those conversations?" and they're like, "well firstly you must cross the alligator spike pit moat"
mind palace that was formerly a palace until the ruling family was killed mercilessly for its crimes. and now it's the thinking woman's socialist republic.
On this day, 27 June 1869, Emma Goldman, the legendary Jewish writer, feminist, birth control advocate and anarchist was born in what is now Lithuania. Emigrating to New York City, she worked in many different jobs, like in textile sweatshops, as a masseuse, and in an ice cream parlour. Goldman stressed the importance of the interconnectedness of different struggles, like women's rights, as well as the need to transform our everyday lives: "The right to vote, or equal civil rights, may be good demands, but true emancipation begins neither at the polls nor in courts. It begins in woman's soul. History tells us that every oppressed class gained true liberation from its masters through its own efforts. It is necessary that woman learn that lesson, that she realise that her freedom will reach as far as her power to achieve her freedom reaches. It is, therefore, far more important for her to begin with her inner regeneration, to cut loose from the weight of prejudices, traditions, and customs. The demand for equal rights in every vocation of life is just and fair; but, after all, the most vital right is the right to love and be loved. Indeed, if partial emancipation is to become a complete and true emancipation of woman, it will have to do away with the ridiculous notion that to be loved, to be sweetheart and mother, is synonymous with being slave or subordinate. It will have to do away with the absurd notion of the dualism of the sexes, or that man and woman represent two antagonistic worlds." For her activism she was arrested many times, jailed repeatedly and eventually stripped of her citizenship and expelled and deported to Russia. We have some of her work, as well as items celebrating her life, available here: https://shop.workingclasshistory.com/collections/all/emma-goldman
it's kind of crazy to not allow kids to swear. why do they have to perform their own childness. is it like, a sex thing for parents, some kinda power play, or what?
it's the same as how violating gender roles (and especially being transgender) makes other people around you uncomfortable even though it has nothing to do with them. it makes the artifice of the social category visible, when people prefer to believe that it's natural. that has implications for the viewer's actions and position within the social category, not just the person they're viewing. they could violate those gender roles in the same way, and so the fact that they're not doing so becomes a choice, rather than a natural inevitability, and their separation from the "opposite" gender becomes lessened, and what does that mean for their own gender? if children aren't a fundamentally different type of creature from adults, with appropriately different moral standards for what behavior towards them are acceptable, then maybe some of the ways that they have treated (and intend to continue to treat) children were like, bad? these types of social categories require active maintenance to keep people believing in the reality and naturalness of the category, and making people do arbitrary and visible stuff like that is a component of that maintenance

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Studies show that approaching youth with a bystander-intervention model is actually a lot more effective for reducing sexual assault, and it is also more enthusiastically received than programs that bill themselves as anti-rape.
We can tell youth that they are basically ârapists waiting to happenâ (anti-rape initiative), or we can tell them that we know they would intervene if they saw harm happening to someone and we want to help empower them to do that (bystander intervention). The kids jump in with both feet for the latter! It was amazing to see children (and young boys in particular) excited to do this work and engage their creativity with it. Also, studies show that not only do they go on to intervene, but they also do not go on to sexually assault people themselves. Bystander intervention also takes the onus off the person being targeted to deter rape and empowers the collective to do something about it. It answers the question in the room when giggling boys are carrying an unconscious young woman up the stairs at a house party, and people are not sure how to respond and are waiting for âsomeoneâ to say or do something.
Richard M. Wright, âRehearsing Consent Culture: Revolutionary Playtimeâ in the anthology Ask: Building Consent Culture edited by Kitty Stryker
This is also, btw, how the US drastically reduced drunk driving in the US. Telling people they shouldnât drive when intoxicated made absolutely zero difference. A slogan-and-ad-campaign for âFriends donât let friends drive drunk!â changed drinking culture. Going after the bystanders is quite often the most effective thing to do in any social change.
actually the sanitization of lesbian media is because of transmisogyny. every backslide you've percieved in acceptance and equality is because of the rise of transmisogyny. free the nipple. marriage rights. clothing options. bathrooms. its all because of this big bioessentialist conservative puritan push to try to erase trans women from society and specifically lesbianism. you cannot leave us behind and expect a better world.
Tumblr users will say "queer history" and mean "midcentury archival records from a specific US-American city that I have extrapolated into a universal mythos" and not even blink
"learn your queer history" I am from fucking INDIA
Maybe your queer elders fictional or otherwise were also influenced by the biases and contradictions of their own circumstances, time, and place and I am no more beholden to their ideas and ways of doing things than I am to any other form of tradition trying to constrain me.
Perhaps history is a conversation and not an edict.
I refuse to reblog callout posts because I'm a prison abolitionist
In all my years in this website, and I've been here a long time, I can't recall a single instance of a callout post leading to actual restitution for the victims of the alleged harm the person was accused of. Even in cases where the accusations were true. Even in cases where there was legitimate harm done to another person.
Remember the sixpencee child slave thing? What happened there, exactly? Was the kid freed? No? They were just run off the website? OK so what good exactly did that do?
Remember the bone stealing witch? What exactly did that witchhunt accomplish? The person got arrested, oh that's great, the american justice system surely rectified the situation
And again, those are instances where the accusations were true and involved real substantive harm to another person. We used to joke on here how callout posts were shit like "receipts below: [several paragraphs of petty fandom drama] [three paragraphs of petty interpersonal drama involving cheating on partners or stealing food out of the fridge or something] [fabricated evidence that the person is responsible for the murder of JonBenĂŠt Ramsey]"
And that was back in the 2010s. The meta has changed. Callouts used to be a tool people used to point out actual harm a person had done, rarely, and more commonly were used as a means of bullying somebody over petty drama. Nowadays they're used to manufacture outrage and harassment against marginalized populations. They are a weapon bigots use to turn us against each other. A few manufactured accusations here, some out of context or clipped screenshots there, and people who should be standing in solidarity with each other against white supremacy, patriarchy, cisheteronormativity, are instead devouring each other.
It's sinister as shit, dude, and people will still share these accusations without a second thought. So, why? What is the point? What's the best case scenario here? Raising "awareness?" what the fuck is that supposed to accomplish? Will we get the oh-so-trustworthy authorities involved? Are we hoping for an arrest? A conviction? Throwing a queer or poc person in prison so they can be abused and assaulted and humiliated behind bars? Is that who we are?
Callouts and the like don't serve any real good in the world. At a macro scale they divide us when we should be standing together, and at a micro scale they result in deeply traumatic never-ending harassment and threats and doxxing and worse to a person who almost definitely does not deserve it. And again, for what? A sense of "justice?" this is not justice. This is retribution. It is punishment.
It's fucking cop behavior, and I'm not gonna participate in it.
I feel like there are no socialist organizations at the moment that consider the non-citizens as truly equal to citizens. A lot of the organizations people will name, of course, see these people as charity cases...as a matter of treating them kindly rather than considering how to give them proper support and equal standing.
I don't know. I feel like the world is largely anti-immigrant and hostile to stateless people, to the point that advocating for their rights is political suicide almost everywhere. From the poor to the very rich, everyone seems to hate the displaced.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
personally I am of the opinion that vegans who are like âthe way our food system currently works under capitalism on a large scale is exceptionally cruel to all animals including humans and is not sustainable, so Iâm doing what I can to make the most ethical choices available to me about what I eat and encourage others to do the sameâ are generally very reasonable people who I agree with in spades. but vegans who seem to think human beings are not themselves animals who are ultimately also part of the food chain but instead some kind of other paternalistic higher entity that can never engage in ethical and sustainable hunting practices (and especially the fringe Iâve seen who think other carnivorous animal predators are also evil and need to be eliminated) are people I regard as foolish at best if not actively anti-indigenous and racist
Americans love Disneyland because itâs a walkable city
Thatâs actually a really popular analogy. Howard Kunstler wrote about Disneyland as a âcapital of unreality,â where âthe public realm is packaged for sale as a commodity.â
âThrough the postwar decades Americans happily allowed their towns to be destroyed. Theyâd flock to Disneyland at Anaheim, or later to Disney World in Florida, and walk down Main Street, and think, gee, it feels good here. Then theyâd go back home and tear down half the old buildings downtown and pave them over for parking lots, throw a parade to celebrate a new K Mart openingâeven when it put ten local merchants out of businessâturn Elm Street into a six-lane crosstown expressway, pass zoning laws that forbade corner grocery stores in residential neighborhoods and setback rules that required every new business to locate on a one-acre lot until things became so spread out you had to drive everywhere. Theyâd build the new central school four miles out of town on a busy highway so that kids couldnât walk there. Theyâd do every fool thing possible to destroy good existing relationships between things in their towns, and put their local economies at the mercy of distant corporations whose officers didnât give a damn whether these towns lived or died. And then, when vacation time rolled around, theyâd flock back to Disney World to feel good about America.â
If anyoneâs interested, The Geography of Nowhere is unrivaled as a crash course on and scathing critique of American postwar urban planning.
Sooner or later leftists will have to deal with the issue that capitalism has made many people used to wanton excess and sooner or later we'll have to legit tell everyone we can't have plastic treats and luxury produce or cruises instantly available year round and it's gonna make so many people mad and call you a big meanie worse than stalin over it. It will not be popular at all but someone's gotta hold a firm no or the planet will never stop collapsing. We can't save the planet by living exactly how we do now just with a communist banner over it we have to take a loss sorry, shein product cycles shouldn't have been normalized to begin with.
The banana discourse really separated the wheat from the chaff of which "lefties" actually want a global workers revolution and which ones just want more stuff to be free
#ok but like bananas are a terrible example cause like#yeah its fruit you have to grow in a specific part of the world during a particular season and you need to ship it everywhere else#but. its food. you eat the food and then the food is in your tummy and it brings value to humanity through that#the truth is that the vast majority of the âexcessâ is stuff that literally nobody has ever cared about#there are so many millions of tons of cheap plastic toys made for nobody that are rotting in landfill#untold heaps of disposable workplace computers#unimaginable volumes of plastic being made and shipped away to build mountains of bootleg earbuds that last 3 months maximum#bananas aren't the problem#the problem is the cheap novelty landline phones made to look like bananas
Bananas were the PERFECT example. "It's food, you eat the food and then the food is in your tummy and it brings value to humanity" is exactly the abstraction that makes it the perfect example. It does not bring value to "humanity" it brings value to the person living in the imperial core that eats it. These countries are not selling their excess food for ice cream money, US-owned corporations within them are using the soil nutrients, sunlight, and human life of these regions and then extracting the profits, leaving nothing but bullet casings and dead earth.
Do you know how many millions of kilograms of beef were exported FROM Ireland TO England during the great potato famine? You are focusing on the leather scraps that were thrown out by english tailors. The shipping is not the problem, the capitalist death squads murdering thousands over "communist organizing" are the problem.
If we got rid of money, we'd obviously stop producing vast amounts of garbage. But would we stop holding the global south hostage for the things we DO consume? Would we be willing to let everyday food become rare so that other people may eat the products of their own labor before sharing it with us? Would we be willing to adapt to a new lifestyle based off what can grow in our own regions? That is the true leftism, not Consumerism But For Free.
There will be no Fully Automated Luxury Space Communism in your lifetime, but we CAN put an end to genocide and ecocide.
The moral argument for allowing transition is trivially simple: Bodily autonomy is one of the most important human rights. No ifs, no buts.
On the social side, preventing transition is an enormous overreach with regard to freedom of expression. Legal gender change is a necessity to protect privacy.
This is all downstream of the simple idea that you should treat trans people like a type of people, an idea that a lot of people get really offended by, as they do with women, racialized people, disabled people, gay people, pretty much any marginalized group in history.
Because the moral argument is trivially against them, bigots will try to frame themselves as a rational, scientifically-minded group trying to rein in the naive optimism of their opponents. They will insist that the science is on their side, and by doing so handwave the moral argument because their point of view is "true".
It is not.
The playbook of these groups is old, reliant on a few rhetorical tricks that play on confirmation bias, and generally tries to do one thing: Engineer talking points that are wrong in ways that take scientific competence to debunk, so that a fully accurate debunking loses general audiences.
That's why it's important to get ahead of them and attack the foundations they're building their rhetoric on.
It's tempting to just fall back on the moral argument, it really is, because these shitheels are arguing positions that are pretty fucking heinous. That should be enough. Unfortunately, it gets you liberal "allies" who seem genuinely embarrassed to be on your side, because they're not confident that their position is empirically correct in addition to being morally correct.
That's why stuff like debunking "concerning" scientific results about trans youth in Finland matters.
Don't cede rhetorical space that belongs to you.
"Legal gender change is a necessity to protect privacy"âthis rings true to me but I'm having trouble articulating the argument, would you mind expanding on this a little?
I don't know if this is exactly how Op would put it but the simple answer is: because transition being illegal necessitates enforcement, and everyone has a body and medical history the privacy of which must then be violated to investigate and enforce that ban. Presto - nobody has meaningful privacy because it's trivial to accuse anyone of something illegal [transitioning] and force violation of their privacy to prove they *haven't* transitioned. So if transition is illegal, you have a ready-made accusation to justify violating literally anyone's privacy.
Oh nah I meant in the sense that changing your legal gender marker is a necessary thing to protect a trans person's privacy, because if the marker is very noticeably different from how you present yourself, anyone who sees your ID will know you're trans.
The general consensus of the "queer community" has essentially become a gated community that allows only specific liberal ideologies, american values, and only surface level tolerance of trans women at best. In practice it essentially filters out the majority of brown people, trans women, global southerners, and so on. The queer community is more like a brand, and anyone who doesn't fit the American, white brand of queerness either gets rejected outright or we get filtered due to our politics and values.
By them declaring themselves the "queer community" they make it sound as though they are representative of queerness itself, rather than representative of just their own beliefs. So an attack on the "queer community" (the brand of queerness) is likened to genuine homophobia/transphobia. While they are allowed to engage in racism and transmisogyny as much as they like.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
One thing I think is very funny is encountering a Very Obvious Mumsnet User trying to pretend to be a normal middle-of-the-road moderate on trans issues like ma'am. Nobody normal says "peaked" like that.
Also when they run into a post like this they'll respond all like "well TIMs pretend to be WOMEN" like ma'am literally only the people who've studied your echo chamber know what you mean by "TIM".
By the way, a common strategy for cults to reinforce ingroup-outgroup divisions is to encourage their members to seek out members of the outgroup and behave in ways that predictably incite backlash.
how can I be transmisogynistic? I didn't say trans women weren't welcome in my home, I said amabs
microcosm of all of queer history lol. they exclude us "inclusively" while benefitting from what we've built
no it was bad like they had to edit the post
I don't get genuinely mad often but I'm genuinely seething at "preference will go to AFAB performers" in the transfem owned dyke bar. in the transfem owned dyke bar. in the transfem owned dyke bar. find me a fucking queer space where these people WON'T discriminate against trans women cause at this point I don't think that sort of thing fucking exists