For as long as weāve known each other, @ennas-aesthetic and I agreed this ending was our favorite. Maybe not the popular one, but one we deeply loved before it even existed. Now that itās here, weād love to share why.
Hope you enjoy reading it as much as we loved writing it! šŖ½
The perfect ending to an otherwise imperfect episode of television
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
On themes, characters, Sir Pratchett and NG [analysis of GO as an adaptation in the face of a divisive finale]
SPOILERS SPOILERS SPOILERS! DNI IF YOU HAVENT WATCHED THE SHOW.
I will preface this by saying I actually quite liked the finale. It didn't leave me that heartbroken, angry or betrayed as it did to some fans. It kind of even scratched the itch I have for stories sometimes.
Anyway, while I thought it to be a perfect ending at first, I have spent some time thinking things over. [To be exact, one night. But I need to let it out somewhere.]
So here are my problems, opinions and nitpicks with the entirety of Good Omens Show-- and the fact that the problem starts in the garden of eden itself, i.e the season 1.
Core
The GO book is not a romance. It is a witty, funny and charming story about humanity. Aziraphale and Crowley are unlikely best friends, in the face of disagreement with their respective higher ups, with shared love for humanity and humane interests. Their dynamic is easily open to a romantic interpretation but I highly doubt Pratchett intended for them to be this explicitly romantic. That's not very Pratchett-- to focus on romance so much. He sprinkles it sometimes. It happens but it is never the point. You know who does love doing that though.. Gaiman.
The first major change which show does is make GO extremely centered around Aziracrow's romance. It isn't that obvious in s1 but s2 takes extreme measures to show that to be the case. I don't mind that. It gives me another version of characters I absolutely love; but it is indeed a different version.
Same goes for the indvidual characters. I will use two instances to show how Gaiman had entirely shifted the core of some Pratchett characterstics and influences.
During the scene in s1 when Aziraphale has discorporated, Crowley goes to the bar, gets drunk and has just given up.
That isn't very Crowley. Not book Crowley atleast, who is an optimist and believes the universe would take care of things at the end anyway. Book Crowley doesn't get wasted or completely lose hope. Show Crowley does. Because of course it makes for an endearing scene, an angsty moment.
Second instance is that book Aziraphale often says that, "Yes, I don't like what is happening any more than you do. I just can't disobey." vs Show Aziraphale who is a whole lot more "Heaven is The Good Side." Book Aziraphale is still 'your lot vs my lot' but not really THAT much.
Now, I don't hate any of these changes! I love the show. A lot. I do. But its important for the point I want to eventually make that I point this out.
The point being...
S1 was where Pratchett's vision ended, really. The book was the Pratchett's vision and the only reason the book had such a tidy conclusion is because STP is amazing at tidy conclusions (see: the entirety of Discworld). NG? Not so much (See: any of the shows he has run). And from S2, while themes of love for humanity, good vs evil, the inherent goodness of world (very Pratchettisque) carry on; the vision is Gaiman's. Even if they planned s3's script out together (which I doubt. I think NG kinda loves exaggerating his friendship with STP), the execution isn't his.
And that brings me to how I have started looking at this situation. The Good Omens book is an entirely different thing from Show Good Omens.
The show is the story of not humanity, but Ineffable Husbands and becomes more and more so as it keeps going on. It tries to be bigger than that in finale, but due to lack of screentime, fails at fleshing out that aspect. S1 was still about humanity but the themes take a backseat in s2 and s3 to the romance of our two beloved characters.
Which is why I say I like the finale.
Because the finale is a terrible, terrible conclusion to the original story, yes. It negates the entire point of book, of season 1. It kind of just brings down the final decision to a supernatural entity which.. is not very true to the original themes, is it? It kind of just negates it all. Again, Pratchett would not end it this way. No, sir. He wouldn't make the story have such a dark turn- wouldn't imply, 'free will never existed in this story btw'. That's a bit too dark and lacks the hope Pratchett's narratives have. That is the darkness Gaiman has a knack for, though.
But the finale IS a good conclusion to the SHOW'S core and stays true to SHOW version of Crowley and Aziraphale.
The show Crowley loves universe. Stars. Space. Existence. He had love for it like an artist has for their art, and if we had a full season, I think that would have become clearer. But either way, show doesn't forget that. Show Crowley chooses universe over himself at the end of the day (or universe : P).
The show Aziraphale is always trying to do the right thing, often his relationship with Crowley taking a backseat due to that, and in the end- he leaves the right thing to be done by Crowley. He gives the frontseat to him and Crowley. Quite poetic. Me like.
Show Crowley *looked* like he just wanted Aziraphale and himself to sod off and spend rest of eternity in some corner, at the cost of 'universe'. Show Aziraphale *looked* like he just wanted to fix it all, even at the cost of their 'us'. The finale takes good care to drive it home that that had never been the case. Crowley has always cared all too much about the universe, so much so that he was wiling to sacrifice the 'us'. Show AZ has always cared all too much about Crowley, that by the end, it had become about the 'best angel' and the 'artist' and his wish, than what AZ wanted.
And then, at the end, they both get to be human. They find each other in a different universe anyway. How romantic.
So. Nice little ending to your character centric love story you have got there! But jesus.. did you just delete the entire old universe...?
Yep.
The themes take a backseat.
Humanity takes a backseat.
The final decision comes down to a supernatural entity.
The finale is entirely fucking Gaiman. It's not Pratchett's story. The reason book ever had a perfect conclusion is solely Pratchett. Originally what was Gaiman's idea only became what it is due to Pratchett's influence. The book implies it all being a test run and blah blah but goddamit that's not where STP would have gone with it even if he showed it to be so! he wouldn't say 'oh the humanity never had fuckin free will lol'. THAT'S ABSURD. I AM SORRY JUST, ITS NOT GOOD OMENS! ITS NOT COMEDY! ITS NOT HOPEFUL! ITS ALL TOO DARK, PLOT TWISTY AND 'HUMANS NEVER HAD POWER' TO BE GOOD OMENS! IT FORGETS TO ESSENCE AND SIMPLICITY WHICH WAS THE CORE OF STORY.
It forgets about the hope Pratchett brings to his narratives. I am sorry if I mention him too much but once you start thinking about the respective writers, how they write, their track record- it all becomes way too obvious that this ending was never something Pratchett co-wrote, as Gaiman loved to imply. (But he is a fuckin liar and much worse, so are we even surprised?)
And when you take his influence away, this is what you get. An adaptation which forgot the identity of the book. Which forgot the comedy and became entirely all too dark. An ending which negates all events and the point season 1 was trying too make, by taking the 'hey what if it really is all just a solitaire game lol' too literally.
And that is why, for my sanity, I seperate the two as different narratives, stories and versions. I seperate the romance show gives me from the themes s1/book had. I let the two endings exist side by side. S3 is the conclusion to a romance (it tries to be a conclusion to themes but fails). S1 is the conclusion to the themes.
I know lots of people will be focusing on the script extract that just dropped on prime and the way the writers wrote the build up to Crowleys decision.
But this stage direction had me giggling.
Writers: Aziraphale turns away, broods
Meanwhile Michael Sheen: Aziraphale turns away, and communicates heartbreak, love, pride and adoration for his demon in the span of 3 seconds of screen time.
The Symmetry of Season 3 and Why That Makes It Beautiful
Ok, more big thoughts here. I just watched for a second time, and what I see on this run through is a beautiful symmetry.
Taken together, all three seasons are a dance, a back and forth between their need for each other and their love for humanity. One of them is always leading, one is retreating, hands locked together in a solid frame that can look like love or like fighting, one that gives them each the room to move, their perspectives whirling, deepening and changing as the view around them morphs.
Itās in the little things. The constant back and forth of them not thanking each other for important things. The wing lifted to shield the other from rain in Eden. The rescue at the Bastille. The thermos of holy water. The rescue at the end of the great war. The paint gun residue on the jacket. The forgiveness in the last bookshop on earth.
And itās there in the biggest things, too, in the entire frame of the show.
In season 2, Crowley is ready to choose their relationship over the fate of humanity, and Aziraphale painfully puts that aside to try to save humanity, because he couldnāt live with himself if he didnāt. Theyāre both devastated by this choice, but itās essential. wasnāt tricked by some spiked latte. He had to do what he did, and he's correct in doing it.
In season 3, by the end, Aziraphale is ready to choose their relationship over everything else. āI only want one thing, Crowley,ā he says, and itās clear he means it. Aziraphale has struggled through all of the love and responsibility for humans, discharged his duty as best he could, and ended up hereāloving Crowley and wanting only him, at peace knowing heās done everything he needed to do, ready to live for his love.
āWhat do you want?ā he asks Crowley, in their moment of privacy by the Tree of Life.
And the thing is ā the thing is, Crowley still WANTS that. He still wants it, so badly that itās etched in every line of his body. But the fact is that now heās grown tooāheās grown past the place he was in at the end of s2, where he valued his own happiness above everyone elseās. He sees the cost that Aziraphale saw all along. And now Crowley is the one who canāt live with the aftereffects of getting what he wants.
Itās *not* just that Aziraphale had to let go of his toxic attachment to Heaven to be able to deserve and appreciate Crowley. Itās that, as with most of their arguments all along, they were *both* RIGHT. Which is why their conflicts existed to begin with. They both had to grow, to discharge their duty, to get around an obstacle preventing them from joining the other.
And so they stand at the end, before God and Satan, holding hands, looking into each otherās eyes. Say what you will, but Aziraphaleās impassioned speech about how Crowley was the best angel is one of the greatest love declarations Iāve ever seen. Crowley sees it as such, Iām convinced. Aziraphale, who heās always believed holds himself as just a bit better than a demon, reveals that he sees Crowleyās core, his inherent goodness, not in a way that implies he was better before, but in a way that shows that Aziraphale understands that this is still EXACTLY WHO CROWLEY IS RIGHT NOW. He finally sees him exactly as he is, loves him, and shows him that. This brings Crowley the peace and closure heās been looking for all along, too.
Theyāve both arrived, in that moment, at peace. They know and have love. They are in perfect accord. It is the biggest and most nontraditional love the world has ever seen, and I think they know in that moment that not one second of it could have been changed. Ā
I firmly believe, given the snowglobe in the garden at the end, that their love and their characters go on and on in multiple worlds and lifetimes, but honestly. Whether you needed a kiss or not, the symmetry of this ending is *breathtaking*.
I have to say, Iām loving it more each time I watch.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I'm team LOVED it. Although I know the fandom is split on this one.
But it was so beautifully poetic. I was never desperate for them to kiss on screen so maybe that's why I liked it? They were not human, they never expressed affection to each other in a human way. But they said it out loud with all their chests.
I get people saying that the couple at the end weren't them but I read it as their love being woven into the fabric of reality in this new universe. Of humans being in love and finding each other time after time (hence the song).
Because the story was never just about them, it was about the world they had built together, balancing each other out. They loved the world together. They wouldn't be who they are without the world. That's always their motivation. It's why they would never truly run away to Alpha Centauri, they are not selfish. It's why Gabriel and Beelezebub end up there instead.
So for them to to sacrifice themselves for a world where the free will has more chance. For them to be the big bang that started this reality. Their love was the spark of creation for the universe.
I thought that was poetic and lovely and definitely something that would come out of a conversation between the 2 authors.
However for those devastated by the ending, I've been there and I'm sorry you're hurting right now. This post is not intended to trivialise your hurt or anger. Just my take on why I liked it.
@stephrc79 I realised it had the official good omens tag at the top of your screen shot after I'd reblogged it š I've seen so many fake ones I went to Instagram and checked there as I don't have twitter then realised I hadn't actually paid attention. I was just so excited!
We all hate the words youāre the bad guys and second in command.
First there was the coffee theory and similar theories -> Aziraphale couldn't have said anything like that, he must have been drugged, he wasn't himself.
Now the lie theory -> Aziraphale couldn't have said anything like that, surely he is putting in action a brilliant plan to save Crowley.
Orā¦
Maybe he's not completely out of the black and white mentality. Maybe there is still a part of him that believes that Heaven is intrinsically good and angels are holier than thou. Maybe he wants to be a good angel. Maybe he feels guilty for having feelings for a demon. Maybe he believes that Crowley would be happy in Heaven, with him, like they were before the beginning. Maybe he believes that the two of them, in Heaven, would be humanity's best chance. Maybe his expression changed between the talk with Metatron and the one with Crowley, because he convinced himself that the Metatronās offer could be a solution. Maybe he makes a choice. Maybe he is not perfect. Maybe the whole story is about choices. Maybe he'll figure it out on his own. Maybe he'll take action and weāll see his character development.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
hey remember when aziraphale and crowley ran into each other in rome and aziraphale said 'well then let me tempt you to- oh, no, that's your job, isn't it, haha'? what if crowley succumbed to the temptation in more ways than one? what if they had oysters and sex about it? then what?
wordcount: 17,8k
rating: explicit
tags: PWP, Rome 41AD, oysters, so many oysters, so many orgasms too, banter, little bit of emotion little bit of angst, but mostly fun, oysters and aardvarks, food kink, oral fixation, roman baths, an oyster is never just an oyster, and what is love but hunger (more tags on ao3)
I leaned that as a British neurodivergent queer woman who has rapidly approaching 40 there have been wonderful women fighting this fight much longer than I realised.
I spent most of my adult life feeling I didn't really deserve to be part of the LGBTQ community because I was bi and had mostly had relationships with men.
It's only since good omens season 1 happened, and I've seen the beautiful creative queer souls that form part of it's fandom, that I truly have been able to explore and understand my own queer identity. Even attended my first Pride. Next year I might even march. I don't feel like I don't deserve to be part of the community anymore.
Aziraphale and Crowley's relationship dynamic fascinates me and what fascinates me even more is how people perceive them, partly because I seem to have a much more optimistic view of their dynamic than a lot of what I read suggests they do.
With that in mind I started trying to unpick how I see their dynamic and why and what I ended up with was a series of rambles on various aspects, including confidence, trust, silliness and what they ask of each other. This one is about what they ask of each other and why their relationship isn't some weird one-sided thing where Crowley gives Aziraphale everything he could possibly want or ask for.
I see a lot of posts and things suggesting Crowley always rolls over and does anything Aziraphale asks of him. I donāt know to what extent most people really believe this or if itās just a fun joke (and Iām not saying thatās bad, I think itās a fun joke too, I love reading all that stuff and it makes me laugh). The point I wanted to make here though is that I donāt think itās true and also why I donāt think itās true.
Everything from here on out is my opinion, but I wonāt keep stating that in order to make it more easily readable, just take it as a given. If your opinion is different thatās absolutely fine, I love that we can all see this stuff in different ways depending on our experiences and personalities, itās why the fandom is so fun. (Itās also why my opinion on so many things in season two ricochets wildly from one theory to another).
So back to Crowley and Aziraphale ā I donāt think Aziraphale walks all over Crowley, or certainly not to the extent that people sometimes think he does. Also Crowley doesnāt and wouldnāt allow himself to be walked all over anyway. Why is this even relevant? Because Iāve seen people say that in the final 15 minutes Aziraphale finally asked Crowley to do something that pushed him over the edge and that Aziraphale was shocked when Crowley didnāt roll over and do it because Crowley always does what Aziraphale asks. This isnāt at all true for a start, but also this view tends to include a second assumption, which is that their relationship is one-sided and Aziraphale never does anything for Crowley, that he dismisses him and takes him for granted, which also is not true in a lot of ways. I think itās a fundamental misinterpretation of their relationship dynamic. Ā
First of all why can Crowleyās actions be interpreted as just rolling over and doing whatever Aziraphale wants? Well, the answer to that is three-fold ā firstly Crowley is a genuinely unselfish in many ways, he does things for people because thatās the way he is, it doesnāt make him a pushover, it just makes him nice. Secondly he loves Aziraphale deeply. Whether he knows it or not doesnāt matter, he cares for Aziraphale and wants him to be happy. This isnāt the same as being a complete doormat, itās simply compromising with the person you are in a relationship with and occasionally prioritising them over yourself. Both these things come together in the third thing, which is that Crowleyās love language is acts of service ā he enjoys doing nice things for Aziraphale, he enjoys rescuing him, or going along with him and letting him have his own way, so why not do it? The point is heās never railroaded into it by Aziraphale, itās always a deliberate choice. He is literally saying, I will do this thing for you because I love you and I enjoy making you happy and this is something I feel I can give to you.
How does Aziraphale see this behaviour?
Well thatās a tricky one, because in many ways Aziraphale is the more complex character, not least because he changes the most over the course of their history together. Is there a slight element of him taking Crowley for granted in some of their interactions, especially in season two? Possibly, but mostly I donāt think thatās it at all. When someone gives you things because their love language is acts of service you develop a (mostly sub-conscious) confidence in that relationship dynamic and if you also have confidence in yourself (which Aziraphale absolutely does ā Iāll write more on this another time) then when you want something you ask for things. You ask not because you learn to expect, but because you think youāre worthy of asking and you think that your relationship is strong enough to stand up to the ask. I ask my husband for things all the time, sometimes theyāre things I know heāll give me ā these are easy asks (I donāt just mean physical objects, I also mean acts of service such as helping me with something), sometimes though Iāll ask for things knowing he probably wonāt give me that thing or without having a clue what his answer will be ā these are harder asks, the sort you donāt do early on in relationships because they might break it either in one go or over time. Sometimes a hard ask results in me getting what I want, sometimes it results in a bit of back and forth before I get what I want, sometimes I get a no and Iām temporarily annoyed or upset, sometimes I get a no and I accept it because I knew it was the most likely outcome.
The point is that I ask, and so does Aziraphale. You ask because you have confidence that you are worthy of the ask and also that your relationship is strong enough to bear the request, even if the answer is no. Can a no still be annoying or upsetting? Yes absolutely. Can a no still be wrong on the part of the other person? Also yes. The point is that sometimes the no isnāt wrong and it doesnāt necessarily break the relationship. By the time season two comes along Aziraphale is confident enough in his relationship with Crowley to feel it can bear the weight of him asking.
So what happens when he asks? Does Crowley roll over?
Once they go to the bookshop and Crowley is confronted with Gabriel he offers the help he feels able to give by saying that heāll drive Gabriel somewhere and dump him. Heās stating his willingness to help (which is important later), but for now heāll only help in one specific way. What he isnāt willing to do is any more than that, not even for Aziraphale.
Help me take care of Gabriel. Help me sort this mess out, Aziraphale says, and what does Crowley say? No. Absolutely not. Youāre on your own with this one. Even after Aziraphale practically begs him for help, complete with puppy dog eyes and the magic word, āIād love you to help me,ā Crowley still says no. That is not the reply of someone who lets themselves be walked all over or who rolls over every time the angel theyāre in love with flutters their eyelashes.
Okay so what about the fact that he returns? Well, the stakes have been raised: for a start Aziraphale is now directly in danger, which alters the balance in favour of helping him, and remember he was already willing to help, he said as much, but he was previously only willing to help in one way. Now thatās changed. Doing things you wouldnāt normally do for someone you love when the stakes are raised is a perfectly normal rection in a relationship and does not indicate an unhealthy dynamic. Crowley has now realised that getting rid of Gabriel is no longer an option - his preferred plan (dumping Gabriel somewhere) will no longer work, so the only choice is now Aziraphaleās plan of keeping him in the bookshop and taking care of him.
This is why he returns.
A quick note on the call
Just backtracking a bit here ā when Aziraphale calls Crowley to ask him for help Crowley agrees to be over in two minutes. Itās instant, no questions asked and at first glance looks like Aziraphale calls and Crowley comes running just because. But nope. Later we are very clearly told that Crowley knows something is wrong the moment he picks up the phone and Aziraphale starts speaking, āThis was your āSomethingās Wrongā voice.ā Crowley already knows thereās a problem and what do you do when your closest friend calls you and tells you about a problem? You try to help. Whether thatās advice, comfort, physically going around to help out or whatever the situation calls for. Of course Crowley says heāll be there in two minutes, he doesnāt exactly have anything else on and his friend has just indirectly told him something is wrong. Heād be a pretty shitty person/entity if he didnāt agree to drop round and try to help.
So what about the apology dance?
This whole interaction, that many people say indicates how under the thumb he is actually shows us the exact opposite. Whatās the first thing Crowley says when Aziraphale asks him to do the dance? āI donāt do the dance.ā This tells us a hell of a lot about their relationship dynamic up to this point ā for a start Aziraphale has clearly done the dance before, at Crowleyās request, and he lists off the occasions. The dance is silly and slightly demeaning and Aziraphale has done it several times for Crowley, whilst Crowley has never done it, yet somehow we read this whole scene as Crowley being the whipped one? Um. No. Also heavily implied in Crowleyās, āI donāt do the danceā statement is, Youāve asked me to do this before, Iāve always said no because I donāt want to. Youāve always accepted my no before and I want (expect!) you to accept it this time.
But this time Aziraphale doesnāt accept the no. Just like Crowley wouldnāt go along with his plan earlier, Aziraphale now wonāt go along with Crowleyās no. Clearly he has done so in the past, but this time their dynamics are different. Theyāve been much more open about their friendship for the past four years, theyāve both accepted that they are at least close friends, if not more. Theyāve saved the world together and saved each other. They both acknowledge they ācarved (this existence) out for ourselvesā and that brings strength to their relationship. Now that Aziraphale has more confidence in what they are to each other, he takes that confidence and tests the limits of what Crowley will do for him, to push them more towards equality. Why should he always be the one to do the dance? Crowley responds by acquiescing not because he would just roll over and do anything for Aziraphale but because he recognises three things. Firstly that Aziraphale is pushing and that this is new and that this means something to him in the context of their relationship, secondly because he reluctantly accepts Aziraphaleās point that it isnāt really fair that he never does it, and finally because the request for him to do the dance isnāt about him refusing to help (Aziraphale was never certain he would), itās about the fact that heās broken Aziraphaleās trust by refusing to help (which is a slightly and very subtly different thing). To illustrate this, right before Crowley does the dance, just after he says āfine,ā he gets this very brief, soft look on his face ā this is him acknowledging to himself that Aziraphale deserves this dance, that he loves the angel and that heās doing this because of both those things ā he could have continued to insist on a no, he clearly has before, but this time he chooses not to.
I will do this thing for you because I love you and I enjoy making you happy and this is something I feel I can give to you.
All right, what about the car thing?
What about it? Lending your car to the person you love is very normal. Ok so the car means more to Crowley than a normal car does to us, but the point still stands. Aziraphale is making a reasonable request here. Does he expect a yes? Absolutely, because he also knows itās a reasonable request given where their relationship is. Does he flirt to get his own way? Hell, yes. Does Crowley know exactly what Aziraphale is playing at? Also a hell yes. And Crowley totally plays up to it, heās not as opposed to it as he claims. Heās playing up his ānoā and his grumpiness for effect, to encourage Aziraphaleās silly flirtiness. Look at the difference between this no and the no he gave Aziraphale earlier. Thereās no anger here, thereās no real sense that he thinks Aziraphale is asking too much, heās playing a role in their relationship and theyāve both played this game before. Look at that little slap of the hand, which Aziraphale responds to equally playfully. The game even continues after Muriel turns up at the shop, when itās already quite clear that Crowley is going to let Aziraphale use the car (heās already taking the plants out). Even in the back-room Crowley still teasingly grumbles about trains whilst Aziraphale smiles flirtily, and Crowley playfully withholds the car keys when Muriel interrupts them. They both know Aziraphale is going to end up with them, thereās no point to him not directly handing them over in spite of the interruption, itās just an excuse to tease Aziraphale back. I mean, look at him ā he spends the rest of the conversation wiggling his hips, grinning smugly and confidently handling the Muriel problem by talking about love. Aziraphaleās very overt reaction tells you all you need to know about the dynamic of this one.
Two can play at this flirting game, angel.
But he follows him around like a little puppy!
Well, yes and no. Sure he follows him around whilst he goes around asking all the shopkeepers to the meeting, but he does that because itās fun for him. Heās curious, Aziraphale is acting oddly, doing something heās never done before and Crowley wants to know what it is. Heās always found him fascinating ā what silly and ridiculous thing is the angel up to now?
Also wanting to hang out with the person you are in love with isnāt at all strange or a sign you are in some sort of weird relationship where only one of you calls the shots. Itās normal. Crowley knows Aziraphale has a tendency to be silly or do unexpected things and he wants to watch him do them and also flirt with him whilst heās doing them. Looking grumpy and reacting to Aziraphaleās silliness with disbelief is how Crowley flirts-without-flirting. Both of them know, understand and like that dynamic, and he has that role not because heās unhealthy levels enthralled with everything Aziraphale does but because of the levels of trust they have spent millennia establishing.
What Crowley doesnāt do is wait around for Aziraphale. Look at the scene where Aziraphale daydreams about Job. In that scene heās aware Aziraphale has something else to show him (the record clue), but he doesnāt stick around whilst Aziraphale ignores him. He could have sat down somewhere in the shop and waited ā heās got an eternity, waiting an hour or so is no big deal, but waiting around like that would suggest he really is a doormat, just waiting for the next time Aziraphale shows him any attention. He doesnāt do that, instead he goes off and does⦠well, something. Thereās a lot of speculation over what it is, but whether he goes off to read Pride and Prejudice or just wanders off to find something more interesting to look at than the back of Aziraphaleās head, heās clearly saying here that he has a life outside of whatever Aziraphale wants to do.
Also side note - you know what else he doesnāt do for Aziraphale? Adjust his driving style. Aziraphale clearly hates it, it makes him nervous and he even asks Crowley to change several times whilst theyāre in the car together, but Crowley never does. This is how I am angel, accept it or donāt, but this is the line and Iām not changing this for you. Related to this is his refusal to accept Aziraphale altering the Bentley. Aziraphale tries to persuade him, āBut itās pretty,ā and Crowley really isnāt having it. Itās another hard line and heās not going to let Aziraphale cross it.
Anything else?
Thereās a few other examples that Iāve seen listed in the, āCrowley does whatever Aziraphale says/wantsā evidence piles. Things like Aziraphale assuming heās going to get the drinks in the pub. Well, someone has to get them, and it makes perfect sense that they both assume itās Crowley here because heās the one more comfortable with pubs. Having a role that you take on within certain situations in a relationship is healthy and normal, imagine how exhausting it would be to debate who is going to do every little thing all of the time.
In the first series the coat cleaning is another example often cited, but this is something Crowley is perfectly happy to do. Aziraphale is flirting, which is delightful, and heās not being asked to do anything difficult or dangerous. I will do this thing for you because I love you and I enjoy making you happy and this is something I feel I can give to you, which is totally different from, you always ask, I always give, and you always take.
What about Aziraphale. When does he give?
All the damn time. We just donāt notice it as much because Crowley asks different things of him. His love language is acts of service towards others, but he doesnāt really ask or require them in return. Sometimes he gets them from Aziraphale anyway (Holy water anyone?) Also notably in the Globe Theatre when heās clearly the one pushing the Arrangement, and Aziraphale more or less agrees to do his work for him (āThat doesnāt sound like hard workā) even before heās asked, before theyāve gone through their little dance of Crowley pushing and Aziraphale supposedly-reluctantly agreeing.
The other things Aziraphale gives Crowley are much more nuanced, and much less measurable to us as the audience, but he gives them constantly, or more or less constantly, throughout their relationship. He gives him acceptance (although he occasionally partially withdraws it, such as in the bandstand scene), his silliness (which is more important than it first appears), a safe space (not just the bookshop, but also a safe space for Crowley to air his real views without fear of consequence, which is important irrespective of whether or not he persuades Aziraphale to agree with him), his physicality (by 1826 heās really in Crowleyās space so much of the time) and most importantly he gives Crowley himself. Crowley constantly pushes Aziraphale to grow as a person, itās one of the original reasons he entertains developing a friendship with him. What he asks of Aziraphale is for Aziraphale to think ā really think ā about what he believes. And Aziraphale does so, but only for Crowley. Humans have constantly questioned religious beliefs throughout history, theyāve written books, made speeches and even had wars over religious doctrine and the problems, inconsistencies and absurdities within it. Crowley is saying nothing to Aziraphale that he wonāt already have indirectly heard from humans and dismissed or ignored. But when Crowley says it, he thinks and he changes. Thatās what Crowley asks of Aziraphale and itās what Aziraphale gives him.
What was the point of all this waffle?
Well, honestly there isnāt much of one. Only that their relationship is much more balanced than some suggest and I think I just wanted to spell that out. It also has an implication for the final 15 minutes. Thereās no way Aziraphale goes into that with some sort of fake confidence that he can persuade Crowley to follow him to heaven simply because Crowley always follows him ā Crowley doesnāt, he has very clear limits that he enforces with Aziraphale and Aziraphale knows this. He might feel confident for other reasons (such as thinking Crowley will be happy to be an angel again) or something else entirely different might be happening (so many theories!) but Iām pretty sure itās nothing to do with thinking Crowley always does what he asks, because he very clearly doesnāt.
It's also why Crowley waits around afterwards to watch Aziraphale leave. Itās a way indirectly of saying one final time, I love you and I enjoy making you happy⦠but this is something I cannot give to you.
I agree with all of this and I think it's changes the "you're the bad guys" line in the final 15. Even after leaving they both refer to their respective old sides as your sides. Crowley expresses his disbelief in "how your lot of stayed in charge this long". They've always called each others sides "your sides". It's awful timing but it's not meant in the way it lands to Crowley.
I feel like I want to explain to young tumblr users who weren't born yet that MulderxScully was a revolutionary ship. No, it was not queer but that is not the only way to be revolutionary.
In the 90s when The X Files was airing, media was like misogyny soup. Yes, there were exceptions. But casual sexism was so ubiquitous it was like we were all frogs simmering in it and if you dared to say, hey, uh, isn't this joke a little shitty to the wife? Or maybe this female character could do something other than pose and ask questions so the male lead can answer them? Then you were a hairy feminist outcast loser.
Scully was a lot of things but she was not that. All the "You're not going to believe this, Scully!" memes are based on the fact that Mulder, an attractive white dude, wanted nothing more in his entire life than to share his passions with this tiny redhead. Was he nuts? Yes. But on many other shows, he would have talked down to her, would've ignored her, would've mocked her. He didn't.
When you go back and watch The X Files, there's these moments where Mulder and Scully look at each other like, "wait did Jack Black really just say that" and the significance to fan history isn't just the sexual tension. It's that, yeah, and the origin of the word ship, and the 'will-they-won't-they'. But the most important thing about those looks is how they told the audience that Mulder was looking to Scully for something. A man was looking at a woman and asking with his eyes "what do you think about this?" Was he also saying "and do you want to bone about it?" Yeah, yeah he was. But the first thing was sexy as hell.
Respecting a woman's expertise and folding information she provided into his worldview was a revolutionary thing for a man to do on television at the time. Thank you for coming to my MSR ted talk.
I happened to be writing for a TV magazine back in the early 90s, and remember getting the very first tape (VHS! hah!) of The X-Files to review. I watched it about five times, and of all things that hit me and I couldn't stop squawking about in the article that resulted was the complete upending of the usual dynamic between male and female characters. It wasn't just the respect for Scully that Mulder displayed (even in that first episode where he was deeply suspicious and wary of a new partner being forced on him, and before he had the opportunity to fully appreciate her expertise) but it was the inversion of trope of the unreliable, flighty female and the rock solid, dependable man. A tv show that actually allowed the main lead to have EMOTIONS! That allowed the female lead to be analytical, and head-first, and possibly even smarter than him!
You are a very lucky person if you don't realise just how revolutionary this was.
(And I was a women's studies major at the time, so was pretty steeped in a wide range of media, and still I tell you - REVOLUTIONARY.)
(plus they were both so hot it was insane even before Scully was allowed to dress a little less dumpy scully)
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
ā Live Streamingā Interactive Chatā Private Showsā HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
looking back, i'm still really happy with izzy's death. a lot of different opinions have been floating around and, hey, this is mine. hell, his death is one of the main reasons i love this season so much
because season 2 is about ed reclaiming his own identity. he has to become the worst version of blackbeard in order to eventually become the best version of ed. ever since the very beginning he's been yearning for blackbeard's death. yet "blackbeard" isn't just ed's dark side-- it's a two-man-team with ed as the face and izzy holding the reins
in his final moments, izzy admits that he saw the faƧade of "blackbeard" as a shelter for his relationship with ed. a place where he was guaranteed to have control, where someone would always need him. he did everything in his power to protect "blackbeard" so that nothing could get in between what he had with ed
but "blackbeard" was always a ticking time bomb. not only did izzy not listen to ed, he didn't let ed listen to his own self. he used ed's weaknesses to serve his own interests. it was just a loop of izzy hurting ed and ed hurting him back, but izzy desperately needed to maintain this. it was all he had
and here's my favorite detail in this scene: right after he says this line is when stede comes back on deck. the weird fancy man who came out of nowhere and freed ed from the shackles of "blackbeard", who inadvertently destroyed izzy's world, silently walks in the background as izzy says:
he sees it now. as he told stede at jackie'z, he sees that stede is good for ed and that they balance each other out. he sees that loving stede is the best thing that's happened to ed. the darkness in ed that created "blackbeard" died during the storm and ed slowly started finding himself thanks to stede. sure, their relationship is awkward, but it's looking promising. izzy doesn't have a "blackbeard" to guard or to guide anymore. as he lets death drag him away, he's happy to take the last bit of "blackbeard" with him so ed can be completely free. having received so much love from his new family aboard the revenge, izzy is able to give ed and stede his blessing. it's a beautiful declaration of acceptance, repentance and encouragement
izzy, as a character, serves ed, who himself isn't even the main protagonist. for a supporting character to have an entire season build up to his death, all while allowing him to grow into the most comfortable and confident man he's ever been... getting to have closure and make amends... in my opinion, that's the greatest honor
This!! I just re watched the episode where Izzy sells them out to the English and he says to Ed that when he first joined him he made, Ed made him swear loyalty to his captain above all else. This was Izzy's final act. He stood in the way of the bullet that would have otherwise hit Ed and he took the last of Blackbeard to his grave. Serving his captain to the end!