What Do I Do With All The Gold On My Fingers

tried watching a minecraft youtube video but the youtuber said dude like 12 times in one minute so i clicked off

why does every gaming youtuber talk like "this is insane dude! woaaaah" it pisses me off

california and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race

it's like baby sensory videos for white boys

tried watching a minecraft youtube video but the youtuber said dude like 12 times in one minute so i clicked off

why does every gaming youtuber talk like "this is insane dude! woaaaah" it pisses me off

really feels like the amount of transfem donation posts has increased lately. please help them survive.

would it be tacky to link my fundraiser here?

this is the perfect post to put fundraisers actually, go ahead

please check out my friend @caseyuptobat she needs some help that I can't give her

i will go to bat for the fact that most of the queer coded villains you see aren't queer coded but specifically transfeminine coded

i think if you can explain the queer coding as "character displays femininity while being a man/mannish and it's portrayed as humorous or monstrous" what you're dealing with is transmisogyny, not some ephemeral "queer coding"

exactly right. none of the famous queer coded villains ever make sexual advances towards heroic characters of the same gender, if they did i would classify that as homophobia, the act of homosexual attraction being targeted as a sign of villainy. instead, "queer coding" targets transfemininity.

ursula is a character who steals the voice from another woman to go be a deceitful fake woman and marry/steal a man from the "real" woman. i'm sorry but wether or not a character is "textually" cis or "textually" a man does not matter in portraying a transmisogynist caricature. next you'll tell me buffalo bill couldn't possibly be a harmful transfeminine stereotype cause the movie tells you he's not one of the real trans women or whatever the fuck

deergirl cum is called donut

hence: donut holes

all donut holes are glazed

and stuffed!

the thing about copyright abolition is that. what makes theft bad is that something is taken away from its rightful owner. in this sense, copyright infringement is literally not theft, because making a copy of something doesn't tangibly cause the original owner to lose anything that they would otherwise have. copyright enforcement, on the other hand, does take away people's access to what should be theirs. anyone who makes art while employed by a corporation and is unable to sell their work because it does not belong to them, anyone who's been sued by a pop musician for making music that sounds vaguely similar if you don't allow the jury to listen to the actual songs, these people have far more in common with victims of theft than anyone whose copyright has been infringed

like the thing with the film rights to MLK's speeches being owned by spielberg / dreamworks, that's not actually an instance where copyright law failed to protect artists. that's the system working as intended. MLK's speeches were his intellectual property. when he died the rights to that intellectual property transfered to his family, and his family decided to sell those rights to dreamworks, thereby functionally preventing anyone else from legally using those speeches in a film for the next several decades. no crime was committed, nobody was tricked into anything, that's just how intellectual property rights work

This is how americans communicate