i’m the normalest guy on the planet btw. #normalboy #normalcore #boynormal #normalguythings
$LAYYYTER
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr

shark vs the universe
RMH

Discoholic 🪩
taylor price
hello vonnie
tumblr dot com

Origami Around
Misplaced Lens Cap

Product Placement
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
official daine visual archive
YOU ARE THE REASON

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
d e v o n
occasionally subtle
Sade Olutola

pixel skylines
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

seen from Malaysia
seen from Chile

seen from Italy
seen from Philippines
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Chile

seen from Kenya

seen from Malaysia

seen from Bangladesh

seen from Iraq

seen from China
seen from France
seen from Germany
seen from India
@perfectlynormalperson
i’m the normalest guy on the planet btw. #normalboy #normalcore #boynormal #normalguythings

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
rent lowering gunshot time so i actually do not think all israelis are evil or that israeli companies are untrustworthy or indeed that israeli newspapers are wildly inaccurate simply because they are israeli. holding any of these views is bad and xenophobic actually. performative protests against israeli people existing in the global space a la refusing to play the israeli football team are completely ridiculous and also xenophobic. <3 bye if u think this post makes me bad and racist for some reason & maybe think about why you think that
pH balance in your mouth, and how it affects your teeth! Inspired by my dentist scolding me for my daily energi drink consumption, cause it’s apparently detrimental to the health of my enamel… whatever that means
why does battery acid have to taste so good…
just read a post with “12,500 years” of palestinian history mentioned and boy fucking howdy now they’re claiming palestinian history goes back before the entire history of civilization, before the entire holocene.
my god, you don’t need to lie about palestinian history. palestinians won’t magically lose their right to self determination if their history in the region is only a few hundred years old.
I think some of this is so revealing, really - because it shows how conditional respect for human welfare is for some of these "activists".
All it takes to respect and want the best for Palestinian people, including an end to the violence they're subjected to, and support for their self determination, is a recognition of their humanity and inherent equality, but in the ideological framework of some of these people, being human isn't enough - you must also be pure and free of any kind of possible wrongdoing.
In some people's minds, it's ok to hurt the bad guys, good even. And the thing that makes the bad guys bad can be inherited from ancestry. So they need to prove that the side they support is inherently good, and the side they don't is inherently bad. They need to trace this goodness or badness throughout all of history to demonstrate this.
It's a fundamentally racist way of thinking. It's inherently violent.
It hasn't occurred to some that neither of these groups is inherently bad or good. That neither possess any kind of intrinsic quality of purity or sin. They don't consider that they should be evaluating people's actions as individuals over their membership in either group.
We don't need either group to be free of historical wrongdoing, we just need them to be equal, free, and human, to want to solve the problem.
it’s like we’re watching all the things we said was wrong about western leftist movements rearing their ugly heads all at once
i do have more to say on this if i can get my brain to create more words
we’ve been telling leftists for years that they’ve recycled the right wing evangelism and authoritarian politics of their parents into a “leftist” version that informs on why so many leftists will so easily swallow authoritarian ideas and actions and lies and i for one am getting sick of being gentle with them about this bs
like we’re literally at the point where leftists will swallow ahistorical shit and conspiracy theories with the same ease their parents will swallow bs from fox news or qanon
i’m seeing propaganda and outright lies about jews and palestinians every single day and it’s not trumpers parroting this nonsense but 20-something leftists, and these 20-somethings are using these lies to dehumanize jews and palestinians alike — because why would only being in the region for a few hundred years make it suddenly ok that palestinians are experiencing a humanitarian crisis of horrific proportions, and why would you lie about jewish indigeneity to the land of israel if you weren’t convinced that indigenous = good and righteous while not indigenous = bad and evil
and don’t even get me started on how this is all coming through the lens of western political theory and western definitions of race/racism
we’ve been telling leftists for years that y’all are disturbingly susceptible to propaganda, to authoritarianism, etc, and you people just keep on leaning into it
idk this was a very disjointed addition but basically what i’m saying boils down to this: why can’t y’all be normal and just care about this humanitarian crisis without doing everything you can to prove horseshoe theory right
I totally agree with what you're saying here.
I think a bit part of why this is happening is because some of these ideologies are thought of as "cool" and so people jump on board without any understanding of these ideologies or their histories.
To be frank, the amount of genocide denial from leftists I notice, as a Buddhist, is insane. Especially from people citing Noam Chomsky. I'm tired of telling people that the Cambodian genocide happened, for example. But there are even more cases.
What especially bothers me is the accusations towards other ideologies of imperialism because Marxist ideology is notable for its imposition as a Western ideology onto non-Western cultures.
It makes it so clear that many of these people don't have a problem with atrocities, they only do if they disagree with the person committing it. But we can and should disagree with violence and destruction on the grounds that, no matter who the perpetrator is, all people have universal value as people.
"Zionism is Jewish supremacist because it supports a Jewish state run by Jews" is the most blatant double standard Jews are held to.
Imagine saying "Wanting Palestine to exist is Arab supremacist because it supports an Arab state run by Arabs."
If you think the principle of self-determination becomes racism when Jews do it then you're just antisemitic.
They square that circle by claiming that the Palestine they want is secular and non-sectarian, and just totally ignore that the two most powerful Palestinian movements are respectively explicitly Arab supremacist and explicitly Islamic supremacist
Yep. Many people have decided to be willfully-ignorant of the reality of what the Palestinian movements are. The truth of what those movements hold dear does not fit nicely into their narrative, nor does it play at all nicely with many of the left's chosen "voices of victimhood" like lgbtq+ folks or the many groups of indigenous peoples.
it truly blows my mind how so many lgbtq+ people in particular made the decision to root for a cause and a people who would actively hunt and murder them in the name of Islamist ideologies.
The fanfiction version (because that's what it is) of Palestine is honestly really rather impressive, and if it wasn't completely made up, it would be a place to root and rally for.
I mean, a nation that existed for 1.5 million years as a pluralistic socialist democracy with advanced medicine, a comprehensive welfare state, advanced technology and ecological integration, populated by "Jewish Palestinians", Muslim Arabs, Christians, and more, all living in peace and harmony for tens of thousands of years...
Until it was all cruelly undone in the Nakba, where the peace-loving, humanitarian, morally superior Palestinians took in the (((Zionist))) refugees only to be betrayed, displaced, and exiled from their homeland and then continuously genocided and crushed under the Zionist control, like how the Spartans brutalized the Helots, until the present day?
Yeah, if that was anywhere near the reality, I'd be upset and advocating for them too!
Of course, not one word of that entire spiel is accurate, but it's literally what they've made themselves believe is true.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
During a private hour-long meeting, Jewish clergy across denominations urged the NYC mayor to change how he talks about rhetoric on Israel
“There were rabbis from across the entire spectrum of our Jewish community, and yet no one gave the message to the mayor, ‘Everything is going great,’” Rabbi Rick Jacobs, president of the Union for Reform Judaism, told the Forward in an interview after the meeting. Jacobs said there was a “uniform sense” in the room that Mamdani needed to understand the impact of his frequent and harsh criticism of Israel, pledge to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and call for protests against the country’s leader when he visits the city. “Everyone agreed that the current course can’t go on,” Jacobs said. “The way he vilifies Israel, and so constantly, is really causing harm.” Rabbi Rachel Timoner, senior rabbi of Congregation Beth Elohim in Brooklyn, offered a similar account of the meeting. Even some of the progressive rabbis in the room, she said, told Mamdani that while they and their congregants agree with him on many things and want to work with him and support him, “they have concerns about the way he is speaking about Israel.” Many of the rabbis, she noted, are themselves “highly critical of Israel,” but approach that criticism from a connection to the country. They urged Mamdani to highlight Israelis and Palestinians working together, acknowledge greater complexity in the situation in Israel, Gaza and the West Bank, and consider moving the public conversation toward issues where City Hall and Jewish leaders can work together.
There's a pattern of Mamdani listening very genuinely to Jewish community leaders' concerns and then going on to do nothing about them (see: the buffer zone law that he literally pretended he thought was a good idea until non Jews started asking him about it), but I'm very glad he's still taking the time to talk with Jewish leaders across the spectrum.
I agree, he should definitely go on Fox News
The dog he shocked is front and center of the pool and vanity shots here.
I do suffer the american condition of liking to drink huge drinks
Lemme get a little sippy
saw this post & blacked out for 30 minutes & came back to awareness having had created this. the creative urge overtook me.
look idk how to tell antisemitic leftists this but magneto is not for you.
ironically Magneto is a brilliant lens for confronting how trauma and fear can drive people to extremes. how far would you go to protect the only family you have left?
but no... Magneto got popular, so he had to be cleaned. and how better to purify him than to erase his Judaism?
goyim should be reading and engaging with Magneto as a way to learn empathy and nuance. he should be a catalyst for important conversations. but noooooo
Yeah, this is fully correct. They should be engaging with the text. This post is more about how if they’re just going to sanitise him for their consumption…I’d rather they not touch him at all. But ideally they should be deeply unpacking the character.
Also, there is a reason Magento is a mutant separatist rather than, like, building coalitions with other marginalized groups. There is a reason he is not pushing for a mutant/queer alliance or the like.
That reason is you, goyishe leftist. He does not trust you, personally, because you and people like you have spent his entire life proving that he cannot trust you.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
the problem with knowing things about battle tactics is that an ever-increasing subset of popular media becomes impossible to enjoy properly because you have to sit there like 'wow Captain Protagonist good to know all those dead people on your own side are a direct result of your total lack of anything resembling brains'
seriously i'm not talking about anything elaborate, just basic common sense, but common sense is so much harder to ignore once you've got systematized data to back it up, like
what do they even think a fortification is for???
what do you think a shield is for. what do you think ranged weapons are for????
make the other sonuvabitch have a hard time killing you without getting killed first! most basic goal of combat! why are movies so bad at writing characters who actually attempt this on even a very small 'army' scale?
and like i said in the first post, it's not just that it's Dumb, the thing is that once you put the character in a command role, their ability to think their way through a combat situation with some degree of optimization becomes a reflection on their character on like. a moral level.
if your tactics are dumb and reckless but you usually win and it's just you punching people that's one thing. or even if it's you and five guys who've decided they like how you roll!
but if you are put in charge of soldiers. and you throw their lives away because you don't know what you're doing. that's not okay.
it's not always avoidable! one of the basic problems with armies! but when it happens in fiction it needs to be on purpose, to make sure the military elements of the narrative remain thematically congruent.
when you have a bit where Main Character is in command and then makes avoidable bad decisions and people die who didn't have to. either the protagonist has been put in a horrific position by whatever authority figure thrust them into a role they didn't want and weren't competent to handle, without support.
or the protagonist, voluntarily assuming a management job they suck at, has committed a grievous harm against others by not recognizing their own limitations.
even if they win! i don't want to be watching a movie where the main character squanders every tactical advantage and loses 40% of their forces totally unnecessarily for Narrative Tension, but the enemy retreats or gets eaten by a dragon or loses the MacGuffin or whatever, and then there's triumphant music and a party because They Won!!!
no! they fucked it up is what they did! this is some Light Brigade gaslighting shit! shut up. our boy just massacred people who trusted him.
kind of a tangent but this is also how I feel when the good guys mow their way through dozens of faceless grunts and then suddenly the big bad in charge is the life they face a moral quandary over
the random foot soldiers and henchmen's lives matter too! tbh
#tbh they should matter MORE #they are way less culpable than whoever's in charge #it's just plot convenient to dehumanize the work force
I think it’s worth noting that history is littered with examples of wasteful tactics. A common element is that often times technology advances while tactics do not.
For example, in the American Civil War, the tactics used of soldiers, marching into open fueled, and exchanging musket fire was not all that different than the tactics of the American revolution a little under 100 years prior. However, the rifles that infantry men were armed with were significantly more accurate. As a result, casualties, both in terms of lives lost, and soldiers, injured were horrific.
The concept of trench warfare in World War I was not all that different from wars, fought all over the continent in the century prior, and were designed to try and curb advantages of cavalry. But again, of mortars, more accurate, rifles, and chemical warfare meant that charging trenches resulted in truly grotesque numbers of casualties.
There is certainly evidence that World War I era generals were fairly callous when it came to casualty figures. They were more interested in territory gained. And it mattered very little how many lives that cost since soldiers were replaceable.
I agree that there should be some narrative coherence when protagonist squander advantages due to bad tactics, but when you look at actual history, it’s very clear that even if there are “good guys“ and “bad guys“ in war, there’s also just a lot of waste. That doesn’t make for a very sexy narrative, but it’s the nature of the beast. Militaries in particular are conservative institutions slow to change. you do things a certain way because that is the way they are done. That will always get people killed. But that’s also excepted as the way things are done.
At the end of the day, I’m just not sure there is a good way to organize two groups of people trying to kill each other.
I think the more interesting question is, should there be?
i mean maybe, but that's not what the post is about, it's about fiction that places warfare centrally, but then engages with it only on an aesthetic level.
thereby creating major ruptures in the narrative logic and characterization for anyone who knows (for example) what the point of a wall is.
this is a writing complaint, about failure to adequately situate motive within character and maintain internal consistency.
i'm not going to ask every piece of fiction that wants to have swords in it to engage in a meditation on the nature of conflict. that sounds boring, and also like it's asking too much of people. i'm aiming way lower here.
the problem is a general failure to care enough about the battle as an event within a narrative to make the pieces go together according to an internal logic. people being dumb is fine as long as they're dumb on purpose. people not doing The Most Winning Thing is fine as long as the priorities they're supposed to have are the priorities they're actually displaying.
There's nothing more frustrating as an audience than being told "this person is a Good Person who Cares about their men and is also a Genius Tactician" and being shown a clown that never thinks before getting most of their people needlessly killed.
Also, regarding WWI specifically, their tactics were a hell of a lot better and more effective than pop culture gives them credit for. They were actually very sophisticated and doing the best they could with what technology they had. The problem is that once you have machine guns, there are only really two ways to break through that rate of fire:
Artillery barrage beforehand to try and kill as many people/machine gun nests as possible on the enemy side, followed by an infantry push that you know is going to take ruinous casualties if it works at all.
Tanks. Armored vehicles capable of driving over a battlefield with thick enough armor that the machine gun isn't a problem.
And they didn't have tanks! They were trying to develop them, but the technology level wasn't there yet. They couldn't move over broken terrain, and they kept breaking down even on smooth terrain. If you're going to have a war at that technology level where you have lots of machine guns but no tanks yet ... then WWI is about the best you're going to do.
Now, obviously, the solution to this is "but why have a war when the technology is at this stupid stalemate level?" but the people fighting the war (even the generals) rarely have control over that.
I love being Jewish bc I can say things like "God isn't a man he's a non-binary cosmic entity that uses He/Him pronouns" and that's true
well, TECHNICALLY. he uses he/they.
What is the technicality????
in Hebrew god is referred to in plural form in a few points. to my understanding it was mostly a symbol of respect, but still. even the Hebrew word אלוקים (i am using the censored version out of respect to any observing Jews who may be reading this), is technically plural.
See, the problem is I don't think G-d uses plural pronouns. At least not commonly. While the word א־להים is plural, it's usually accompanied by singular pronouns, adjectives and verbs. This does a lot in the way of convincing people it refers to a singular entity rather than a pantheon. Imagine if the Torah would've started בראשית בראו א־להים את השמים ואת הארץ, there's no way people won't interpret that as some sort of pantheon. There are weird occasions - נעשה אדם בצלמנו כדמותנו in Bereshit 1:26, א־להים קדשים in Yehoshua 24:19, and possibly more occasions, but they're uncommon. In addition, the word אלהים was used once to refer to Ba‘al in the singular, along with a singular he pronoun. Also, at least once I managed to find referring to G-d in the plural is from Pelishtim, which could be said to have misgendered/misnumbered Him considering they were polytheists. However, based on Yehushua, this might still be a practice among Jews as well as goyim, and Jews dedicated to monotheism at that. So, G-d usually goes by he/him, but the occasional they/them is also fine.
that's fair. @you-are-not-real pointed out use of terms such as א-להים אדירים but idk if that's used anywhere in the tanakh.
for what's worth, grammatically at least, he uses he/they. again, technically.
Right. So after I looked it up a bit... Remember when I mentioned Pelishtim?
מִ֣י יַצִּילֵ֔נוּ מִיַּ֛ד הָֽאֱלֹהִ֥ים הָֽאַדִּירִ֖ים הָאֵ֑לֶּה אֵ֧לֶּה הֵ֣ם הָֽאֱלֹהִ֗ים הַמַּכִּ֧ים אֶת־מִצְרַ֛יִם
-Shemu’el 1 4:8
That's the source for this exclamation supposedly. At least, the oldest one I can find. So, @you-are-not-real, I'm hurt that you'd support the misnumbering (kind of) of G-d. /j
tagging @jewishtransdyke and @yanzinator as well, as i failed to provide them with a proper example earlier
aren't there also instances of feminine language for g-d?
Quite a bit yee; some siddurim have alternative options to use feminine language so for example: if I turn to the page on my shul's siddur to pray Nisim B'chol Yom (Miracles of Daily Life) we have the option to say "Nevareich et Ein hachayim yotzeret haolam" instead of the traditional "Baruch atah Adonai"—speaking of, you can also use "shekhina" which has a feminine connotation to refer to HaShem instead of "Adonai" from what I'm aware of
What I'm gathering is that G-d has He/She pronouns but will also accept the pronoun "themself" because it's the singular form of a plural pronoun.
How can a computer operating system even have opinions on the existence of Israel???
Got me wondering about other OSs, does Ubuntu recognize the independence of Timor-Leste? Who does Windows consider the true leader of Libya? What does Mac think of the military coup in Burkina Faso?
OPEN THE FUCKING SCHOOLS!
Forget about the author's barely disguised fetish. What about the author's barely disguised antisemitism

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Let the historical record show that Mr. Beast was entirely ignorable if you were just like doing literally anything else. I've been on youtube as long as it's been around and I've never been recommended a video by him. I see him in passing as a meme. I thought he was a made up joke, a caricature of bad youtuber content miners until someone I trust confirmed his existence to me in late 2025.
I have cut people out of my life for lesser infractions than antisemitism. I would rather have no friends at all than have friends around whom I need to walk on eggshells. I have had to read one too many posts about conversations people have had with gentiles in their lives where it is patently obvious that there is no room for further dialogue and when the comments inevitably question the legitimacy of the friendship in question, the author will try to defend the indefensible because acquiescence is easier than confrontation. Understand that a friend who doesn’t respect you cannot ever truly be considered your friend. You will always be waiting for the other shoe to drop.
I get the desire to ward off loneliness by surrounding yourself with bodies, but it is well past time to find yourselves a backbone. And if the only friends who remain are Jews, then the only friends who remain are Jews.