rather be in hell than alone

ANYA TAYLOR-JOY as EMMA WOODHOUSE & MIA GOTH as HARRIET SMITH

chapter 2: validation of harm and protection from accusation

summary: After a brawl between the children, something heavier ensues between two protective parents.

chapter 1: the accusation

words: 1,500

summary:a child's play gone wrong.

Two children at the scene but who is telling the truth? Bumi accuses Izumi of causing him injury but Izumi is adamant she didn't do anything wrong. Will the adults handle this correctly, or will the children be the only ones acting their age?

So, let's start by saying I was just reading Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed and was trying to grip on Freire's concept of critical consciousness.

What's critical consciousness?

Critical consciousness is the ability to recognize how social, political, and economic systems shape people's lives and to question inequalities rather than simply accepting them. People who LACK critical consciousness tend to uphold hierarchies and structures actively oppressing another class.

Freire also argues that it involves not only understanding these structures but also acting to change them.

Does Mai actually show signs of critical consciousness?

I was pleasantly surprised that yes, Mai show signs of it based on these two panels alone. Not full-blown Freirean, but there's signs of it.

Here's how:

1. She questions the dominant ideology.

Shihan says education should produce obedient future leaders, focused on war, politics, and discipline. Mai immediately challenges the assumption: "Actually, I don't think they do." In Freire's terms, Mai is refusing to accept the official narrative as natural or unquestionable.

2. She recognizes that education is political.

Shihan treats curriculum as a tool for shaping loyal Fire Nation citizens.

Mai is implicitly asking:

Why should education be organized around the needs of the state?

Freire argues that critical consciousness begins when people realize education is never neutral. Mai is challenging social conditions.

3. She critiques historical power structures.

Her statement, "The less we uphold from Ozai and Sozin's reign, the better the Fire Nation will be," suggests an awareness that present institutions are shaped by past systems of domination.

That's very close to what Freire means by recognizing historical and social structures rather than treating them as inevitable.

4. She advocates truthful historical understanding.

"To make sure these kids are learning what exactly happened during the Hundred Year War."

This resembles Freire's emphasis on unveiling reality rather than reproducing myths that benefit those in power.

And then then there's this which just has me saying, fuck yeah Sifu Mai.