I. Why is there such a strong Sunni/Shia divide? I know the Comparative Religion 101 answer. The early Muslims were debating who was the rightful caliph. Some of them said Abu Bakr, others said AliâŚ
Excellent article on the social tech of tribalism, along the same lines as Kevin Simlerâs writings about âreligion is not about beliefsâ.
Scholars call the process of creating a new tribe âethnogenesisâ â Robbersâ Cave was artificially inducing ethnogenesis to see what would happen. My model of ethnogenesis involves four stages: pre-existing differences, a rallying flag, differentiation, and dissolution.
Pre-existing differences are the raw materials out of which tribes are made. A good tribe combines people who have similar interests and styles of interaction even before the ethnogenesis event. Any description of these differences will necessarily involve stereotypes, but a lot of them should be hard to argue. For example, atheists are often pretty similar to one another even before they deconvert from their religion and officially become atheists. Theyâre usually nerdy, skeptical, rational, not very big on community or togetherness, sarcastic, well-educated. At the risk of going into touchier territory, theyâre pretty often white and male. You take a sample of a hundred equally religious churchgoers and pick out the ones who are most like the sort of people who are atheists even if all of them are 100% believers. But thereâs also something more than that. There are subtle habits of thought, not yet described by any word or sentence, which atheists are more likely to have than other people. Itâs part of the reason why atheists need atheism as a rallying flag instead of just starting the Skeptical Nerdy Male Club.
The rallying flag is the explicit purpose of the tribe. Itâs usually a belief, event, or activity that get people with that specific pre-existing difference together and excited. Often it brings previously latent differences into sharp relief. People meet around the rallying flag, encounter each other, and say âYou seem like a kindred soul!â or âI thought I was the only one!â Usually it suggests some course of action, which provides the tribe with a purpose. For atheists, the rallying flag is not believing in God. Somebody says âHey, I donât believe in God, if you also donât believe in God come over here and weâll hang out together and talk about how much religious people suck.â All the atheists go over by the rallying flag and get very excited about meeting each other. It starts with âWow, you hate church too?â, moves on to âReally, you also like science fiction?â, and ends up at âWow, you have the same undefinable habits of thought that I do!â
Development is all of the processes by which the fledgling tribe gains its own culture and history. Itâs a turning-inward and strengthening-of-walls, which transforms it from âA Group Of People Who Do Not Believe In God And Happen To Be In The Same Placeâ to âThe Atheist Tribeâ. For example, atheists have symbols like that âAâ inside an atom. They have jokes and mascots like Russellâs Teapot and the Invisible Pink Unicorn. They have their own set of heroes, both mythologized past heroes like Galileo and controversial-but-undeniably-important modern heroes like Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett. They have celebrities like P.Z. Myers and Hemant Mehta. They have universally-agreed-upon villains to be booed and hated, like televangelists or the Westboro Baptist Church. They have grievances, like all the times that atheists have been fired or picked on by religious people, and all the laws about pledging allegiance to one nation under God and so on. They have stereotypes about themselves â intelligent, helpful, passionate â and stereotypes about their outgroups â deluded, ignorant, bigoted.
Dissolution is optional. The point of the previous three steps is to build a âwallâ between the tribe and the outside, a series of systematic differences that let everybody know which side theyâre on. If a tribe was never really that different from the surrounding population, stops caring that much about its rallying flag, and doesnât develop enough culture, then the wall fails and the members disperse into the surrounding population. The classic example is the assimilation of immigrant groups like Irish-Americans, but history is littered with failed communes, cults, and political movements. Atheism hasnât quite dissolved yet, but occasionally you see hints of the process. A lot of the comments around âAtheism Plusâ centered around this idea of âOkay, talking about how thereâs no God all the time has gotten boring, plus nobody interesting believes in God anymore anyway, so letâs become about social justice insteadâ. The parts of atheism who went along with that message mostly dissolved into the broader social justice community â there are a host of nominally atheist blogs that havenât talked about anything except social justice in months. Other fragments of the atheist community dissolved into transhumanism, or libertarianism, or any of a number of other things. Although thereâs still an atheist community, it no longer seems quite as vibrant and cohesive as it used to be.
