Freak you can taunt

(Loooong read ahead lol)

I am always trying to explain to people that I have done the research & I feel the evidence that Michael Jackson is a pedophile is minimal & while I support victims as a rule I feel this case is more complex than people make it.

Consistently I am told I am not listening to victims blah blah blah.

Are there a handful of easy sources I can quote or arguments I can make to minimize how difficult this topic is??? I am so so so tired of defending MJ everytime this topic is breached.

Believe it or not, what I'm about to describe to you is the SHORT explanation of how Michael being innocent is the only logical conclusion and why the people who argue against it are the ones who are ignoring CONFIRMED survivors of abuse *cracks knuckles*

What People Don't Want You To Know

1 - Evan Chandler, the father of Jordan Chandler, the first boy to ever claim to have been abused by Michael was recorded admiting on a call that he didn't care about his son's well-being at all, would ruin Michael by getting the nastiest legal team that would "get him everything he wanted" (which was a movie deal that he flat out tried to blackmail Michael for), and was going to punish his ex-wife, June Chandler, for not siding with him by making sure she never got to see their son again.

June testified that she did not believe Michael ever touched her son. Jordan, got emancipated from his father, acccused him of TRYING TO MURDER HIM, and has largely disappeared from the public eye (aside from the odd, quickly deleted tweet praising Michael and/or lamenting his death), with people who were in his life and agreed to speak to the media at all only ever saying "Jordan is okay and he does not believe Michael ever abused anyone." It's always "believe the victims!" until the victims don't say what they wanna hear.

As for Evan Chandler, the bastard did everyone a favor and killed himself mere months after Michael's death.

2 - Michael was FORCED into settling the Jordan Chandler CIVIL case (not a CRIMINAL one, like people who love saying he "bought victims' silence" claim, Jordan and everyone associated with him was free to testify in court, it just so happened that the only one willing to do so DEFENDED Michael) for several reasons.

He was in the middle of a tour (and the people who would make money off of it went as far as trying to settle with Evan Chandler WITHOUT MICHAEL'S PERMISSION), he had just gone to rehab for his addiction to painkillers, and, most importantly, in a violation of his rights, the civil trial would happen without need for a criminal one, meaning that, if Evan tried to sue again, his team would know his entire defense and have months or even years to work around it, skyrocketing the chance of a guilty veredict regardless of evidence, and Michael wasn't going to risk being sent to prison unfairly.

All the "evidence" (except one that will be adressed in the former topic) that would be used in the Jordan case was allowed to be looked at in the Arvizo case a decade later, and the prosecutor of both, Tom Sneddon, was bragging about how he'd "get Michael" twice over... only to be laughed out of court.

3 - There was a body-search the prosecution forced Michael to agree to, in which he would have several photos taken of his body, focusing on the genitals. This was deeply traumatic for a man known for having been a victim of sexual harrassment and physical abuse since he was a child, on top of a history of self-image issues that led to him covering mirrors and developing an eating disorder... yet Michael was not the one who tried to prevent these from being used as evidence in court, Evan Chandler was the one who made that move.

Why? Because the pictures did not match his son's descriptions (which had eggregious claims like Michael being circumscized when the photos proved he wasn't) proving that, despite claiming he had been forced do to several sexual acts with Michael for months, Jordan had clearly never seen the man naked.

4 - The book "Michael Jackson was my LOVER", written by Victor Gutierrez, a proud, confessed pedophile associated with the evil organization that is NAMBLA, claims to be based on Jordan Chandler's "secret diary." Jordan has repeatedly stated this is false, and even his acusations don't match what's described in the book - which is nothing but the disgusting fantasies of Gutierrez, who made up things like a "secret wedding, with rings and vows" in an attempt to portray that kind of thing as ROMANTIC, hence the "LOVER" part of the title.

Gutierrez also claimed to have video proof of Michael having sex with his nephew, Taj Jackson (who defends his uncle to this day), as well as lover letters he had sent to children. Gutierrez was sued for his claims, failed to hand over all of this supposed damning evidence, lost the trial, and fled the country to avoid facing consequences. 90% of all the more outlandish claims against Michael come from him, since before fleeing, he went to every sensationalist TV show ever, to give plenty of lengthy interviews about all the "proof" he supposedly had, yet none of it ever materialized, because it was all bullshit from a delusional creep that had the explicit intention of making people think pedophilia was GOOD.

5 - The Arvizos (the family of the 2003 case) were proven to be scammers, with them having already confessed to falsely accusing a security guard at a store they had been shoplifting at of sexually assaulting the mother. Their claims against Michael included being forced to sell their home and all their belongings to go live with him (which was easily disproved) and that he was trying to kidnap them all to Brazil VIA HOT-AIR BALOON.

Their nonsense is often backed by garbage-with-legs, Martin Bashir, a """journalist""", who was behind the slanderous """documentary" Living With Michael Jackson, in which footage was maliciously edited to make Michael look bad (which was proven by Michael's team releasing the real thing in "The Footage You Were Never Meant To See"). Bashir was also exposed repeatedly for things such as forging documents to manipulate and gain access to other powerful people he had access to, including princess Diana, whose family has denounced him repeatedly.

6 - Tom Sneddon, the prosecutor in both the 1993 and 2003 cases, was repeatedly accused of racism by Michael. He responded to these accusations by yelling racist insults at him outside of court and giving interviews saying he'd never listen to "his kind" of music.

He also tried to "prove" Michael gave Gavin Arvizo pornographic material for them to look at and masturbate together by... taking a porn magazine out of a protective case, making Gavin hold it IN FRONT OF THE JUDGE AND JURY, putting it back on the case, and tell brag that he knew the boys fingertips would be in it.

People were not impressed by this. Much like they weren't impressed by his attempt to label all the lesbian porn found Michael's computer as "gay (male) porn" and thus proof he was interested in little boys. Am still surprised he at least he knew better than to claim Michael repeatedly looking up porn of women who were OLDER than him meant he liked kids.

8 - The so-called "eye witnesses" against Michael, that went to TV or to court against him, were former employees that had been fired for things like stealing from his homes, made claims that contradict even the accusers (a woman claimed to have seen Michael abuse Jordan in one of the showers at Neverland, but Jordan claimed he was abused ON TOUR IN EUROPE, not at Michael's ranch in the USA), and most of them admited to having been PAID by sensationalist media to just validate whatever crazy stories they made up. Understandably, their testimonies were considered useless and unreliable.

9 - LaToya Jackson, Michael's sister, was forced by her husband (who had been abusing her verbally, physically and sexually) to claim she had "proof" her brother was a pedophile. Guilters love using "his own sister said it" as proof, conveniently ignoring that, the second LaToya was freed from her abuser (after he tried to murder her, no less) she came clean about it all being lies she had been forced to say at gun-point.

Paris Jackson, Michael's daughter, is also often pointed at by stupid people as "hinting at something" for not defending her father publically more often (because she DOES do it on occasion, despite what these liars claim), despite the fact that she has repeatedly said that the reason for it is how triggering and painful it is to hear someone she loved so much, and lost so young, be talked about in such a vile context, especially when she's been a victim of sexual abuse herself.

Again "believe survivors" until what they say is not convenient.

10 - Taj Jackson, Brett Barners and Macauley Culkin are three names frequently thrown around as potential/confirmed victims of Michael, despite the fact that all three defend him to this day and have gone as far as taking legal action against people over misrepresenting their dynamics with Michael.

11 - The FBI began investigating Michael since the very first accusation, and it went on for over a decade. Random raids of all his properties for years, every phone call being recorded, every device monitored, and even cutting into mattresses in case something was hidden inside. Nothing was ever found, and these files have been public since his death in 2009. Despite this, nonsense narratives of him threatening victims over the phone or owning any kind of CSAM or having any connection to criminals like Diddy or Epstein (whose victims have accused literal presidents of every crime imaginable yet insist Michael had nothing to do with anything) are pushed as fact against all evidence.

12 - James Safechuck and Wade Robson, accused Michael of abuse in the 2014 """documentary""" Leaving Neverland... when the former was broke and the latter had just lost his job at the Cirque Du Solei homage show to Michael. They've full on used Victor Gutierrez's book as inspiration for their false accusations, down to the secret wedding shit, which I remind you, is literally pro-pedophilia propaganda.

The """documentary""" has been caught in several lies, including editing pictures and videos to make it seem like Michael was alone with them when he wasn't or admired Hitler and thus was "obsessed with white children" (nooooothing racist about this MJ witchhunt, oh no, no, no), claiming they were molested in places that did not yet exist during the entire people in which they were supposedly "romanctically involved with Michael" (like the Neverland Train Station), stating Michael never let them meet each other as kids to keep them from finding out they weren't the only ones "dating" him despite footage of them together during that time, or in towns Michael never went to, or Wade claiming Michael spent years "training" him to be disgusted by women when the truth is Michael set him up with his niece whom Wade dated for SEVEN WHOLE YEARS!

The director is also a fame-hungry weirdo that keeps going "The SECOND part of the documentary will reveal all the evidence! Just give me 3 more years! There! Second part is out! Oh, you're still not convinced? That's because the THIRD part will be the one I'll reveal all the evidence in! Trust me, guys!"

13 - THE PARENTS WERE ALWAYS AROUND! All claims that parents weren't allowed in Michael's room, or in the house, when their kids were there, are absolutely false. Michael's room was ridiculously huge exactly because he wanted to accomodate all his guests there with him. It wasn't "Michael fully alone with two or three kids all night, and only they know what truly happened" like people say, it was "Michael with two or three ENTIRE FAMILIES, aka plenty of adults that could quickly identify any suspicious behavior and not only put a stop to it, but call the police." This is part of why the 2003 Chandler/Arvizo trial ended with Michael being declared innocent in record time and why no court has accepted the Robson/Safechuck lawsuits against the MJ Estate. There were literal dozens of eye-witnesses that could, and did, testify in Michael's defense.

14 - While Neverland, the ranch, was visited by children brought on by charities like Make A Wish, Michael's actual home inside it was off limits when he wasn't around - which was quite often considering his busy schedule of recoring and touring (on top of the fact he mostly stayed at the properties of Lisa Marie Presley while they were married from 1994-1996). Speaking of Lisa...

15 - Michael and Lisa's short-lived marriage is often dismissed as a mere PR stunt by people who either don't know, or don't want you to know, that they were actually together for almost decade. Lisa and Michael became friends in 1992, began an emotional (and perhaps de facto) affair at some point between late 1993-early 1994 while she was still married to her first husband, their relationship became official when they got married in May, and the divorce in 1996 wasn't the end for them, as they were on and off from 1997-2001. Everyone close to Michael said he loved Lisa until his death, which wrecked her with grief, and Lisa repeatedly said that, if people hadn't meddled, the two of them would have been together until the end. Lisa is also a survivor of CSA, as her mother allowed one of her ex-boyfriends to abuse her, and has always said that Michael never, ever behaved inappropriately with any kids.

16 - The recent accusers, the Cascios, got in serious trouble with the Jackson family, as well as MJ fans, all the way back in 2010 for selling "MJ songs" (that were clearly not sang by him at all) to the estate to be added to the posthumous album "Michael", which led to a lawsuit and the removal of the songs from the tracklist. They've also written books about being Michael's "saviors", and have joined tons of vultures in having unauthorized access to his possessitions (such as letters, jewels, clothes and even underwear) in the chaos after his death, flat out stealing it all and selling it to collectors and tabloids. They have zero credibility and are just gross scammers trying to make more money off of a dead man whose memory they have already disrespected in every way imaginable for over a decade.

uhh amazing