Untitled

Second, Sara Nathan, who worked for Page Six, got the exclusive months ago that Meghan would be back in 2025 with her show and other projects. Also, she's the one who released the "Meghan would never make that mistake" article after the Mother's Day photo so she's clearly being briefed by them. Weeks ago, Sara was named in Blake Lively's lawsuit for being involved in the smear campaign against her and Justin Baldoni briefing to her.

Kate gets bashed all the time on social media. People attack her kids, her family, attack her marriage everyday (these loonies have been on divorce watch for 6 years), they accuse her of faking her cancer, the entire world went after her for a badly edited photo, many conspiracy theories have been out there

Even William, say what you want but Harry has never been publicly accused of cheating and having illegitimate children on National TV.

He's never been accused of domestic abuse or even murder.

Even years ago, William was always the one getting bad press while Harry was the golden boy of the family.

Her inner strength and mental fortitude.

She took back her boyfriend despite how much peaceful her life was without him in it. She was willing to put up with paparazzi, reporters hacking her phone calls and voicemails, and everyone being in her private business because she loved him that much.

She married him knowing that she'd have to live her hardest days out in public. She married him knowing that everyone would critique and have opinions on her body, her clothes, her hair, her voice, her work. She married him knowing that she'd have to share her children with complete strangers, that the press would be all up in her hoo-ha when she was pregant with said children, and that random strangers would be critiquing her parenting and mothering. She married him knowing that people would never see her as (or let her be) her own person.

A magazine published photos that a paparazzo took of her from 2 miles away while she was on a private holiday in a private home and had removed her top to sunbathe. She still appeared in public the very next day as if nothing had happened.

Her brother-in-law's wife called her a racist after three years of bashing her and bullying her daughter. She still appeared in public the very next day as if nothing had happened and she wasn't upset.

She was very sick and ill through three pregnancies but still showed up with a smile on her face to do her job. Her brother had severe depression and possibly thoughts of self-harm and she was attending therapy sessions to support and help him; she still showed up with a smile on her face to do her job. Photographers stalked her and her young son, to the point of hiding out in their car at a children's playground, and she still let us in to watch her son grow up.

She announced she was going through a severe and significant health crisis, published a family photo of her strength and stay, and people roasted her for making the kind of edits we all make, and she still continues to give us her family photos. She announced her health crisis was so much worse than initially expected, and people began openly speculating on her marriage and whether she was even alive.

She had every right to go with her husband to a beloved family member's bedside while they were dying but she stayed home so the brother-in-law's toxic wife couldn't go anywhere near the grieving family. When all she wanted was to stay home, cuddle their children to help them understand the finality of death, and cry over the loss of someone who meant so dearly and so personally to her, she put on a nice outfit, did her hair and makeup, and went out to greet the public to comfort them on their loss, not once, not twice, but five times.

To have the inner strength and the mental fortitude to keep showing up to a thankless press, a critical public, and the eye of history -- that takes a lot. Not all of us can do that. It's a rare and special kind of person who can.

“Meghan being included in the list of people Sara Nathan smeared? Ignoring the fact that Sara Nathan also writes Sussex exclusive stories.” - Submitted by Anonymous

Two people names in Blake Lively's lawsuit are sisters Melissa and Sara Nathan.

Melissa Nathan founded The Agency Group, the PR firm hired by Justin Baldoni for "crisis PR."

Sara Nathan is the Editor at Large for the New York Post. She also wrote the Page Six item in March (leaked by the Sussexes, 99.9% likely) that Meghan would never have a photoshop fail the way Kate did.

Regardless of how much Sussex-approved PR played into the Kate saga, they had a hand, and they benefitted from it (or attempted to). Never once did they condemn the misogyny Catherine was facing. And, for Harry, he said nothing while some of the most vile lies and smears against his brother were being thrown around for fun.

Later in March, Meghan "launched" American Riveria Orchard. Never mind whether products will ever come out--Netflix greenlighted her cooking show based around. Which, again, was a harebrained attempt to gain attention and one-up her SIL who was undergoing cancer treatment.

I would just like to remind you that they are paid by the taxpayers to be representatives of the United Kingdom and to support associations and all initiatives on site made by the subjects of the King.

I maintain that they live in a golden bubble and it is starting to show.

They are not paid to be a family. They are a job. NO! William and Catherine are not workers or cashiers or cleaners. No their money does not come from a company that is created. It is an accumulation of wealth over centuries.

NO, they are not paid to do what they love mental health and ecology.

Look at the difference between her photos for these 40 years and the description and now ....

yes I know she has gone through some things (scoop I had 2 tumors so ...)

He and Kate only became full time working royal at the age of 35, in 2017 and even then, it took them a while to start solo projects (Earthshot, ECE).

I think William would rather live like all his aristo friends: all the money and privileges without the responsibilities and spotlight

Kate, to me, comes across as someone who loves her little life in the countryside, being a mum and raising her children. I don't get people who say her life goal is to be Queen. I think she just likes being a stay at home mum.

She moved her family from a palace to a smaller home in the countryside, she drops the children off to school and picks them up everyday. She doesn't want to work too much because she doesn't to be away from the children too much. She never carries out engagements when the children are on school break.

She's a stay-at-home mum at heart. Nothing wrong with that but her and William are the Prince and Princess of Wales. As the Queen said, you have to be seen to be believed.

I have sympathy for what's Kate's gone through but a lot of people with cancer still have to work everyday and it's not like she's working 10 hours a day. She can honestly carry out a few engagements while the kids are at school

I'll say it, once and for all: Kate had it worse than Meghan.

She has been harassed for nearly 20 years by the press, even involving her family and being chased dangerously by paparazzi FOR REAL. She has been called every sexist name; horrible articles have been printed for others' entertainment and profit.

She has had three hypermetries gradvarium pregnancies, and potentially other ongoing health issues for years. And then her selfish sister-in-law comes in and only add more abuse.

Meghan was never silent. She leaked the whole damn time. No one abused her. She abused others

And what, Meghan received bad press because...she was a spoiled brat to her dad? She hosted a publicity-seeking, Kardashian-esque baby shower? She cleared out bleachers at Wimbledon for no reason? She bullied her powerless employees? Well yeah. Actions have consequences. If you treat people poorly, abuse your power, or misuse your influence as a government official, then you will fairly get called out on it.

Unpopular opinion but Kate had it worse than Harry's wife but many aren't ready for that conversation. The only difference is that Kate never said anything publicly about what went through. Let's take a trip down memory lane:

Kate started dating William when she was in her late teens/early 20s. The media weren't kind to her at all, constantly criticising her, her family especially her mother. She definitely went through a lot of classism from the press who constantly mocked her coal miner roots

Kate and William broke up in 2007. The media was practically gloating because they thought Kate was not good enough for William because she's not an aristocrat. She was "too middle class"

Kate and William eventually got back together and got engaged years later. You'd think the media would leave them alone but no... Totally bullying this young girl, who was in her mid 20s.

All the while, she was being stalked by paparazzis daily for years with no royal protection because she was just a girlfriend

But, but, but... haters will tell you that the palace started protected Kate after Kate and William got married and they never did so H&M. Did they? Calling their kids parasite, mocking her weight, linking her to women having abortions, calling her an exhibitionist, blaming her when a nurse killed herself after a prank by Australian hosts, while she was in the hospital, preparing to give birth, trying to get informations about Kate pretending to be the Queen, slammed for the renovations of KP, accusations of feuds between her and The Queen, Camilla and the York sisters, accusing about her family being social climbers. And mind you, Kate was married to William so there was no more excuse not to defend her. Did the palace release a statement to defend her? No, they didn't

In 2012, a topless paparazzi photo of her made it to the cover of a French magazine and it turned into a worldwide scandal. It was the first time that the palace came out and defended her. They sued and won

In 2014, it was revealed that Kate's phone was hacked 155 times during the time she dated William. The sued and won

Then, Meghan came into the scene. People can say what they want but the media definitely pitted the two against each other for the beginning, except Kate was the one getting the bad press while M was constantly being praised. You only have to look back at documentaries and articles from the moment her relationship with Harry was revealed to the press to the first 6 months into their marriage, the press was extremely positive. I've never seen a royal bride be so well received by the media, never. The media really praised her as a royal moderniser that would change the monarchy for the better. The Royal Family broke several traditions to make her feel welcome. In their own words, the family was extremely accepting.

It was Meghan, the beautiful, stylish, independent, breath of fresh air Hollywood star vs boring, traditional Kate

Yes, of course, Meghan had some negative press. Everyone in the family did. There was also three very clear instances that were clearly racist though: "the straight out of Compton article" which was written for the Daily Mail L.A, which makes sense because I'm pretty sure most people in the UK don't know what or where Compton is.

This is terrible but not everyone loves the RF. Anti monarchists have been going at Kate for years: Kate's children were called parasites when they were, the Daily Mirror had a cover with the headline that cocaine was found in her hospital room, while she was in the hospital giving birth to Charlotte, they mocked her weight, called her an exhibitionist,...

That article was immediately condemned by Harry and the media

The second instance was when someone involved in politics said something about pure blood. She was condemned

Then, the journalist that posted the photo of a monkey saying that it was H&M's baby was immediately fired.

As we are seen now with the Where is Kate saga, the RF do not and cannot control SM. Social media companies definitely have to do better but how is that the RF's fault?

Their popularity in the media started to change due to their actions. (The blood diamonds, the private jets, the bullying of their staff,...)

People will claim that the palace never defended Meghan but she wife was a royal for 17 months. During that time, KP released 17 statements defending her. Here are a few:

They've never defended Kate this hard. Never!

Meghan was the royal family for less than 2 years. The palace released 17 statements defending her.

In the first 2 years of her marriage to William, the palace only released 1 statement defending Kate. ONE, about the topless photos.

Even years after that, they barely defended her.

The difference is that unlike Meghan, Kate never complained (she easily could have)

Just because Kate had a few good years in the press (2019-), that doesn't erase everything she went through and even now, you have H&M crazy fans making up rumours about her health, her marriage, constantly attacking her kids, attacking her parents