Digimodernism and Publication
In Communicable Capitalism, Dean claims the digital revolution in technology has created a world where â[t]he only thing that is relevant is circulation, the addition to the poolâ which âhas been constituted in and through conflict over specific practices and subjectivitiesâ (Dean 26, 44). Â This is in line with Kirbyâs ideas of publication in his âAntilexicon of Digimodernismâ, where he predicts âa shift in our idea of publishing toward greater stratification and hierarchy, internally divided into higher and lower formsâ (Kirby 66). Â Where everyone participates in the mindless buzz of the internet in the form of a âbroadcast public discussionâ, conversation and participation loses a good deal of meaning (Kirby 63). Â Think about how this idea is drilled into every studentâs head; donât cite Wikipedia articles. Â Apparently in the world of academia (which has its own hierarchical structures), a website with content from potentially anyone anywhere is frowned upon for citing information, even though there is a new âauthorshipâ emerging. Â In a truly ideal digital world, this would not be the case, so here I am comfortable saying Kirby was right about the stratification (making a hierarchy) of digital information and sources, as well as the loss of inherent worth of participation.














