I know this is sadly seen as a heated topic in the ROV fandom and community so I assure and promise that I ask this genuinely out of curiosity and because I want to understand things better but has Ikeda made any comments regarding the scene where Andre assaults Oscar? I have interpreted it as an old unfortunate trope of its time (plus we see similar stuff even in modern stories today, for example there is this whole genre known as Dark romance) where the man assaulting or almost forcing himself on the woman is seen as romantic or passionate, like "oh, he loves and wants her so much that he wasn't able to control himself anymore!". Plus I also thought that Ikeda was trying to showcase the desperation Andre feels and the tragicness of his situation. Like, he loves Oscar but cannot marry her due to him being lower social class than her and he is losing his eyesight which means soon he won't ever be able to see the woman he loves so all of that drives him to make a poor decision and lapse in reasoning and thus he ends up assaulting Oscar. So I wondered if Ikeda has every commented why she wrote that scene or why she wrote Andre the way she did in that scene? My grievance with that scene is that it is never brought up again after it happens and Oscar and Andre never discuss it afterwards. I also find it unfortunate that Oscar starts to see Andre as a man after he assaulted her. I want to clarify that I am not against characters doing problematic things because even in real life people sometimes make problematic choices in good and loving relationships. If you don't mind me asking, what are your thoughts about that scene? It's fine if you don't want to answer that but I would be interested to heard (well, read) your thoughts and opinions about it. Do you think it is fine as it is or do you wish it had been handled differently? Sorry about this essay and thank you so much in advance and thank you so much for all your hard work for the ROV fandom!
No, she hasn’t. I have never seen her speak on it in anything I have read anyway.
What I think about it.
Regarding the poison scene doing a lot of the same things: I completely agree with that, but I have to say that I think the poison scene would not work well if this scene had not come first.
This scene was very necessary for Oscar's development for the reasons you already pointed out, and she needed that development (seeing André as his own separate person) for her to understand what happened with regards to the poisoned wine.
Like, he is so powerless. We see that he is in the incident scene, too, but that is about his feelings; this scene is about his fate—and hers.
Keep in mind that the marriage arc is the first time Oscar feels as helpless and powerless as André has always been and it turns her into a shell of her former self. She's completely mired in her depression and drinking to excess to cope. She can't even talk about it. Seeing that André considered something as drastic as murder/suicide doesn't tell her that he wants her dead, but that he was willing to try the only thing that was in his power to help her even though it would have damned his eternal soul.
Her that her happiness and comfort mean the most to him. More than his own self. His own afterlife. His eternity.
And even though she's too far mired to convince herself to fight for her own happiness, she can sure as hell fight for his. He needs her to. He cannot do it for himself; he does not have that power.
Something something his unhappiness means her unhappiness and she knows what that means even though she struggles to articulate it in that straightforward "I love you" way. Remember, she tells Girodelle that if you love someone you don't want them to be unhappy and then goes on to say that if André was unhappy then she, too, would be the unhappiest person the world.
To which Girodelle says, "I understand."
I think a lot of people see the poisoning scene as like this very selfish moment for André but they don't realize that it's also showing us how selfish Oscar is; she's so lost in her own pain she doesn't see André's at all, even though his life is also affected by her marriage; she also KNOWS he is having problems with his eyes but is too busy thinking of herself to feel like she can help him.
But he NEEDED HER to stand up for herself. He needed it because he could not do it himself; he did not have the right or the power to save or protect her.
It's an unpleasant scene but Oscar needed something to slap her out of that helplessness she was imagining for herself that wasn't even real.
Please don't think I'm diminishing her mental illness (which she clearly has) by saying this, either. I just think it's important to point out that for all of Oscar's good points, she has many bad points, too. She is OFTEN very selfish, and takes advantage of André's good nature. The incident scene forces her to contend with the fact that the reason André has always been so compliant is because he loves her, and so his love is the reason she's been allowed to live freely. A love she never noticed because she did not see him as his own person, but rather, an extension of herself and of her will.
She starts to grow after that, and tries to pay more attention to André as his own person, but the marriage arc has her backsliding hard. Without the understanding she gained in the incident scene, I don't think she could have made sense of his actions in the marriage arc. But with them, it's a reminder that he loves her and that she matters to him, even when it feels like she doesn't to anyone else. It gives her something to fight for.
For what it's worth I don't think "the poisoning scene" itself was necessary, but something* that gave her an excuse to break the engagement off that wasn't purely selfish was—and it always had to come from André.
*And before anyone can suggest that André could have simply spoken to her and told her he loved her and begged her tearfully to do something, it doesn't work because he promised he'd never do that again after the incident scene and it's very important to the story that he held to it.
--
Also, VERY UNDERRATED section of your post is that some of this was for the serialization factor. Cliffhangers and drama that won't be fully resolved each chapter is super exciting for readers and rating polls and the like, which was important for this series. I am sure if Ikeda had the chance to write the whole thing over again, knowing the ending of her story and how much space she had, we'd have a rather different story.
But I don't really want that, so I won't think too much about it. Despite its flaws, I love this series.
Love this. While there are probably different ways things could have been done or shifted around I really don't think they need to be. These two scenes are fine imo and do work well together. Both are needed to push Oscar at these different moments in the story (and are I believe a couple years apart?). I think she gets forgotten a lot in discussions about these two, as well as the more unpleasant aspects of her character. For something that was serialized things really do connect and pull together really well. Rov really is one of those stories that I am very satisfied with and don't feel the need for anything to change. Even everyone dying! 😂
This thread has perfectly described how I see the shirt scene, and the wine scene adds another point, to which I could add that besides showing the vulnerability of André Facing Oscar's
The emphasis he places on death, death as a form of freedom within a history of social classes, death does not distinguish ranks or medals or "purity of blood", This applies to everyone.
At that point, then, we see that only in death would they be so alike and free to love each other (which is why that post-mortem reunion scene is so important).It does not cater to a mere romantic discourse but to the thinking of the time, that is why The New Heloise also has weight here, it is a reflection of the thinking of the time.















