Over Sexualization and Under Representation of Women in Videogames- Conclusion
After saying all of that I would like to conclude by saying that I am not condemning videogames or the people who play them because despite all of their shortcomings they are a very interesting form of entertainment. I would also like to acknowledge that there are some, albeit few, games that seem to have a good sense of how to represent women in a way that does them justice without being oppressive or misogynistic. Granted there are some debates about some characters’ outfits, Skyrim by Bethesda is one game with an overall good sense of gender equality with the option to choose either a male or female character, in addition to different races and body types for characters with many other customizable features of their personality and lifestyle that allows them to be able to relate more closely to the character they have created, including equal marriage rights without discrimination against race or gender of either partner, which is surprising since the game has a very medieval setting and when it was released in 2011 there were only five states in the country that allowed for same-sex marriage. While I do believe Skyrim is a good example of a game displaying gender equality, there are many more games, as I have previously discussed, that have no sense of gender equality. Drawing from Audre Lorde’s essay The Uses of Anger and her statement, “I am not free while any woman is unfree, even when her shackles are very different from my own,” I feel that the world of videogames cannot be truly representative of our world until there are fair representations of people of different genders, races, sexuality and ability. Recognizing that this issue is not the most pressing gender-related issue, this is a pretty significant issue in the sphere of entertainment because women should not feel excluded from this amazing and ever-expanding form of art and entertainment.
Lorde, Audre. “The Uses of Anger: Women Responding to Racism .” Sister Outsider, pp. 124–133.












