Paul du Pointe du Lac was someone Louis "loved more than anyone on earth" and was never really allowed grieve for on account of being hunted by Lestat. As a consequence of that, he loses the ties and love of his sister, Grace, who buries the memory of him before leaving NOLA (IIRC).
So, it makes sense that, in their journey to absolve Lestat of all wrongdoing against Louis, perhaps to shake the ever persistent audience suspicion that he may have had a hand in his death, they would drag Paul from the grave. Drag him out and get him to thank Lestat for loving his brother how "he needed to be loved".
It's quite the death knell, turning Paul into someone sympathetic to Lestat, where his last words were were telling his brother, "Do not trust that man". And had the opposite effect (lmao), apparently. Because now I'm seeing people say, "Damn, he did kill Louis's brother!"
With Loumand (as it is referred) there were a lot of ways to handle what is, effectively, the fallout of yet another abusive relationship. But the writer have shown time and again, they see Louis committing normal relationship woes (arguing, questioning, being emotionally distant with his partners) as equal to abusive behavior.
And yet, none of it is comparable to what the writers had Armand do (i.e. the murder of his daughter, Claudia, the mind manipulation) and then do again to Louis (beheading him, torturing Claudia's doppelganger, branding him). In the end, everything comes back to that sham trial/lynching.
So, naturally they avoid it. And for them to go in the direction they did - again, largely to avoid making Lestat pay the piper to anybody - is not only predictable (at this point), but also feels like the writer's malice expressed to its fullest intent.
And in the end, after stripping the apparent nuances in Louis's past role working the red light district (the politics that therein with with regard to his class standing, and even the relationships he had with those minor sex worker characters), the writers suggests Louis's former occupation puts him on level with Marius who groomed and abused Armand. Marius, who has more ties to Lestat, and how Lestat tended to talk about Armand and his abuse.
For the writers, Louis did not meet a specific criteria of talking to Armand about his past or loving him, "Louis used him" and this Armand getting his well earned lick-back. The Loumand scream fest from 2x05 is a greater sin than Armand torturing him not once, but twice, and doing it with a live audience in mind.
And then they have Armand brand him like an enslaved negro, which cozies up nicely with Claudia's ghost to calling him a biologically determined slave and saying Lestat is actually her favorite father.
Of the other things I've read about TVL, the showrunners saying, that the previous two seasons were about "Louis navel gazing" (this specific term being used to say "selfish" or "narcissistic") vs. trying to reckon with his past and the relationships therein, certainly says a lot.
hole-lee-shiiit my dudes, white supremacy levels over nine-thousand