https://www.tumblr.com/revvingantlers/813646531698868224/gender-what-is-it-its-that-thing-in-your-head?source=share
Didn't even say "man" and "woman". Sorry guys those don't exist anymore. 😭
Somebody doesn't know what intersex actually is. 😬
Insert the "this is a joke, right?" meme-
[ID: Image 1 states "There are 3 genders:
1. male (would expect MALE sex traits, such as the penis)
2. female (would expect FEMALE sex traits, such as the vagina, or breasts)
3. nonbinary (would expect neither MALE nor FEMALE sex traits, nullsex, or BOTH at once, duosex. This, if polls didn't count fakers, would be much rarer)"
Image 2 states: "There are two natural sexes, which are simply:
1. Male (testes, penis, then the secondary traits caused by testorsterone such as a larger larynx which causes a deeper voice, broader shoulders, more fat distribution around the abdomen, more muscle mass, and more body hair)
2. Female (ovaries, uterus, vagina, then the secondary traits caused by estrogen, such as breast development, more fat distribution around the hips and thighs, a wider pelvis, a menstrual cycle, also there's progesterone too because of that)
Intersexuality is a deformity, and not counted, even if it is natural. The fact that said deformities are always some mix of male and female solidifies the fact that male and female are the only two true sexes."
Image 3 states: "Nonbinary is similar, and like a cousin to transsexualism, but not transsexual, as transsexual is having a gender opposite to your sex. Nonbinary has no opposite, as it is neither male nor female. It also requires dysphoria, that being duosex or nullsex, and is inherently androgynous.
Now, of course, transsexuals and nonbinary individuals will, basically always, seek out, or wish for, options to make their gender and sex align to alleviate said dypshoria.
Now, there are "transgenders" in the world. Contrary to popular belief, they are not actually "trans," and hatred against them is not transphobia."
/End ID]
This is transmedicalism, exorsexism, and intersexism. (Block the user, don't harass.)
For image one - Man, woman, and non-binary do not describe (and have never described) sex traits. They describe a psychosocial experience, not necessarily a sexual one (though many people feel their gender connects to their sex in some way, shape, or form.)
Looking into cultural genders around the world, and the history of transness and genderqueerness, you can very blatantly see that womanhood, manhood, and enbyhood have never been dictated by sex alone. This framework is extraordinarily eurocentric.
For image two - Its very funny that they missed quite a few traits for SPETE (someone perisex expected to estrogenize) and SPETA (someone perisex expected to androgenize), and also hypergeneralized to the point of completely contradicting themself. (For example, they missed the sex chromosomes, but I have the feeling they intentionally left that out because they view intersexuality as just a "deformed male/female".)
They say "there are only two sexes", proceed to explain these supposed "two sexes", but then bring up nullsex and duomorphic people. I know they probably meant "there are only two NATAL sexes", but still, even that makes no sense with their acknowledgement of nullsex and duomorphic individuals - if intersexuality is a deformity, then how come being nullsex and duomorphic is perfectly natural in their eyes when paired with being non-binary?
Also, people like this make me laugh when they speak about intersexuality, because...what do they classify intersex people who are in the extremely "mixed" or "null" category? For example, if an intersex person has ambiguous genitalia, ambiguous reproductive duct, ovotestes, XX/XY chromosomes, and an androestrogenized hormone profile...are they a "deformed male" or a "deformed female"? How do you tell? It's a genuinely stupid framework.
Not to mention, the "always some mix of male and female" point is incorrect. For example, if a person is born with no genitalia, no reproductive system, and goes through no puberty without HRT, how exactly do you categorize them as a "mix of male and female"? Thats just one of hundreds of examples I could give about how this definition they have is so painfully wrong.
Some intersex people have mixed sex traits, but others have null, small, duplicated, or just differently-shaped sex traits, or even just differences that can only be discovered through a hormone or chromosome test.
A person could have all the same traits as SPETE or SPETA except for chromosomes, hormones that could only be detected on a blood test, the placement of the urethra, less or extra reproductive organs, less or more genitalia, a curved or webbed penis, testes that are in an unexpected spot, etc, etc, etc.
For image three - First of all, there is no "opposite" gender or sex. That's called oppositional sexism and is harmful towards feminism, and is rooted in exorsexism and varsexism. I hate how people still use that term.
Second of all, non-binary people aren't all neutral, null, or androgynous. Enben can also have genders that are feminine, woman-aligned, masculine, man-aligned, xenine, outherine, aporine, multigendered, multitransitional, etc.
Third of all- transsex is for people who identify with a different sex, transgender is for people who identify with a different gender. Some people are transsex and transgender, but other variations (ie; a cisgender transsex person) exist.
Finally, not every trans person experiences dysphoria. A trans person might just experience disconnect, euphoria, or other such feelings about their gender or sex. Thats why there's been a push to say "gender incongruence" instead of gender dysphoria, and why the ICD has gender incongruence listed in it instead of dysphoria.