My Personal Ethic
This was a very daunting post to write.Ā
I feel as though the question of my āpersonal ethicā as a nature interpreter is something thatās always in the back of my mind. Upon reflection, I realized that I have some conflicted feelings about referring to myself as a nature interpreter and that I donāt feel entirely comfortable thinking of myself as one. I think that the term āNature Interpreterā alludes to a certain amount of expertise and authority, and thereās a part of me that doesnāt feel like Iāve developed enough skills or done enough work to claim that authority and I think this ties back to one of my bigger issues: My reluctance to call myself an environmentalist.
On one hand, the natural world is very important to me. Nature is something thatās always brought me a lot of joy and wonder, and I feel very strongly about how itās worth protecting. That being said, I always hesitate to call myself an environmentalist because no matter what I do, I never quite feel like Iāve earned that title because I always feel like I could have done more. This could be down to a sort of impostor syndrome that makes me feel as though my values will forever be undermined by all the plastic straws Iāve used over the course of my life.
However, reading some of the blog posts and reflections here has made me question some of the self-doubt Iāve been carrying. Iāve picked up on a love, reverence, and passion you all have for the natural world, and I donāt think I would hesitate to call any of you nature interpreters or environmentalists, regardless of whether you used a plastic grocery bag or ordered something from Amazon in the past week. Going forward, Iām going to extend the same grace towards myself, especially now that I understand how valuable that grace can be. Ā
During one of our podcast episodes, my team and I spoke about the importance of learning and speaking about environmental issues, and how changing hearts and minds can make a positive impact. Looking back, it feels as though making that claim while doubting whether I can call myself an environmentalist is a little hypocritical. I think that something as simple as calling yourself an environmentalist can be a powerful act of nature interpretation. Itās a simple act, but by using that label, youāre telling people that nature has a great deal of value to you, and that can help spread awareness. That being said, I donāt think itās enough to adopt the label. I think that calling yourself an environmentalist or a nature interpreter comes with responsibilities, and I think those responsibilities vary based on your skills or your passions.
I think that developing my skills and my approach to nature interpretation has value beyond what I can personally do to help the environment. I was struck by how much I enjoyed the podcast assignment. In fact, after my team and I finished recording our second podcast, I was reminded of unit nine where we were asked to reflect on what gets us fired up.
I found that writing the script, and especially writing some of the more interpretive aspects of our podcasts, was challenging in a way that was really engaging to me. I was reminded that making inaccessible content make sense to more people is something that gives me a real sense of purpose and that there were moments during the podcast assignment where I genuinely did feel āfired up.ā Ā Ā Ā Ā
My team chose urban forestry as our podcast topic, and I was doing research on and working on the scripts, I was reminded of how fascinating and important urban forests can be. (It also reminded me of how fascinating urban planning can be, but I imagine thatās not as universal of an experience.) On top of that, recording the podcast gave me a chance to have a conversation about something I care about with people who feel the same way and even though it was a scripted conversation, I think it did a lot to lift my mood. Altogether, the podcast assignment got me feeling animated and excited in a way thatās been harder and harder to come by. Ā
I think itās been difficult for a lot of us to get āfired upā over the past two years. I think that as we become more connected as a society, we become more exposed to and aware of threats to climate, economic and social justice. While I believe that this is ultimately a positive impact, I think that it also makes us more vulnerable to mental and emotional burnout and the added impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic As difficult as it may be, I think these threats and drains on our mental health make it more important than ever to find sources of passion, and I think that nature might be one of the most important sources of passion that I have.
I know that when I started this class, I thought that most of my value as a nature interpreter would be rooted in my skills as a communicator. I think that my work here has confirmed that I do have those skills and that theyāre valuable skills to have. However, I think that I also uncovered some of my blind spots, and a lot of skills I need to develop as I move forward in this field.
For instance, I was discussing some of my coursework with my partner earlier in the semester and he pointed out that there are probably a lot of people who are interested in nature, but who donāt feel inspired to pursue their interest. I think that engaging with that audience and inspiring them to act could make a positive impact on the world. While I know that Iām good at putting complicated concepts into simple, concise terms and I think that makes sense given my background in news writing. However, working on blog posts and podcasts made me realize that if Iām going to seriously pursue the field of Nature Interpretation, I need to learn how to inspire as well as communicate and I think thatās going to be one of the biggest things I work on as I move forward.
Thank you for your blog post. I also have imposter syndrome when it come to nature interpretation. I also struggle with identity as a nature interpreter. This seems like a big responsibility to guide people through their relationships with nature. The impacts of that are quite large if we do not as a society start to reconnect and develop out relationship with nature. In Louvās talk from week 10 I thought it was interesting that his definition of nature was defined by our, the human beings, relationships with other creatures and plants found in nature. The key word her is relationship. How many have us felt disconnected from nature at time of stress, like when we have a big project at work or family stress? How many people turned to nature during the pandemic to calm the anxiety of a global pandemic? I agree with you that communication skills are a key part to being successful in rebuilding or inspiring someone to build a relationship with nature. It is also something that I will be working on as I go forward. Writing is a weakness of mine and I would love to take a course to learn how to improve. I know one key part is to become inspire by others who are doing it great! Decode the greatness. My goal is to try to follow content makers who are doing it great to decode their method. Your podcast topics sounds really cool! I also reflect on creating more nature in urban spaces. Increasing accessibility for all.






















