MAGIC_MEAT ✒️🦷

but I recently posted a yumeship post and labelled myself as sharing…

I ended up seeing a double and I got very uncomfortable for some reason, and I’ve come to the realisation I’m probably a nonsharing or selective yume shipper…

To other people who yumeship with Edgeshot/Shinya Kamihara who are here, your yumeship is 100% canon! Please do avoid interacting with me however, since it may make me a bit uncomfortable, but I’m not too sure on my exact boundaries yet, so feel free to ask if you’re unsure! (Not that I’m a big creator or popular, but it’s good to be open?)

Spoon shot but finished.

I present to tumblr, my yumeship slop.

It is a self insert x Edgeshot…

Enjoy my art.

my poorly embroidered Edgeshot.

Good news: It is 100% Edgeshot centric

Bad news: It’s in first person (Edgeshot’s perspective unless states otherwise, but it is supposed to come off as him talking and sharing the experience with the viewers)

HELLOOOOO THERE MISTER

I reached out to the author and I got the fic.

I have downloaded it. I am very happy.

I AM ABSOLUTELY SPIRALLING FROM THE LOST OF THIS FIC SO I AM CRASHING OUT ON TUMBLR FOR HELP.

(The ship is the characters in the tag)

Also is it rude to ask about the deleted fic in the comment section of the author’s post BECAUSE I AM ABSOLUTELY SPIRALLING FROM HOW BADLY I NEED TO READ THIS FIC AGAIN.

I can fit someone under my skin

One major thing I note is the way the HPSC carries out tasks.

Like with Lady Nagant, they had her assassinating those who went against the status quo, being criminals or villains even if they haven’t done anything yet.

This tells me that the HPSC follows a very black white state of morality. There can only be good and bad people, and that people who have bad/evil thoughts and ideas need to be put down immediately.

This also suggests the HPSC has an entire “we prevent the bad thing before it happens, this erasing the bad thing”, and hence allows me to link to the idea of the HPSC greatly benefiting off of a society that dehumanises both “villains” and heroes.

By dehumanising both villains and heroes, the HPSC is able to effectively turn them into full black and white state of morals, where villains or only bad and heroes are only good. Dehumanising both heroes and villains allows the HPSC is carry out the tasks of removing what they believe is evil without the rejection of the public. This is why Twice’s death was so impactful, because it completely shatters the dehumanising appearances that the HPSC has built for both heroes and villains, resulting in a break and an obscene amount of backlash towards the heroes.

This is also why the HPSC benefits from dehumanising heroes. Because by doing so, the public further won’t question how questionable the tasks the heroes are doing are, as the heroes become a blank state of what is good, so surely everything a hero does is good as well.

This could explain why many heroes obsess over public image or avoid it entirely. Because they are in a sense trained to conform to a base of what is considered “good” and “heroic”. (Also could explain why Aizawa sticks to being an underground hero because it ultimately gives him more freedom on how he acts as both a hero and a person).

The act of dehumanising both the heroes and villains makes it easy for the HPSC to both force on a more simple way of morality onto the people, but also makes it easier to gain the people’s favour.

They provide a simple, clear goal and objective, alongside a clear stance of how the world should be. Only good and heroic people exist, not bad people or villains or even criminals.

It is also why All Might was so important as the symbol of peace. Because he was the ultimate definition of being “pure good”. He is the upholder of what good and peace is. He is everything the HPSC is advocating for. Peace, and good. When he fell, a major part of what the HPSC advocated for collapsed as well, hence the increase in crime since the very cornerstone of what the black and white society was built on collapsed.

The HPSC also thrived off the idea of good always being greater than evil, that good will always win. This is part of attracting people to support heroes and to convince people to become heroes. Because most people do want to be on the winning side. This is also where All Might plays a strong role because he himself was proof that good always won. Since he never seemed to have lost a fight against the villains, he was living proof of it.

I also believe the HPSC deemed those that were potentially dangerous to society as “evil” and “bad”, which I’ll touch in a later part.

This idea that the HPSC perpetuates of there only being good and bad, also perpetuates the idea of worth being given to people.

This is where quirkless people come in. Now I highly believe the reason quirkless people receive the hate they do isn’t because they are viewed as weak or vulnerable, but because they are viewed as worth less than those with quirks.

seeing Bakugo’s interactions with Midoriya, we see that he views Midoriya as worthless, which we can assume is thought of the same for other quirkless people. This is also seen in Tenko Shimura and how his dad treats him, saying that quirkless people need to know their place and all.

This could be caused both by the HPSC and also overall society. As society adjusts to those with quirks, and them becoming the norm, they idea of who can contribute the most to the new system are those with quirks. This also pushes quirkless people down some more, as they are no longer the ideal “working class citizen” that is required for the world to function. Especially people with quirks that could potentially benefit them in the workplace, quirkless people are less sought for. The HPSC’s idea of there only good and bad may also come to people as being worth a lot of being worth very little, as this subconsciously pushes the idea of quirkless people being worth less in their society, alongside the idea that they are deadweight.

This can also be influenced by the importance of heroes in the later years, as since quirkless people can’t even become heroes, it means there is a sense very little they can do to contribute to society (which is not true at all, but likely perpetuated in mha).

I also believe this is where SOME of the hatred for those with mutant quirks comes from. Given the HPSC likely labels anyone who poses a mild threat to the safety and peace of society as a villain, people with mutant quirks are also automatically associated with that. Look at Shoji. He has the strength to crush a human skull.

Assuming many mutant quirk users have enhanced strength and abilities, this may result in hatred towards them because they would be more detrimental to society if they were villains. And since the citizens only really know the idea of good pushing down evil, their only solution is to react violently and push down what they believe is evil too. This is not just about discrimination or putting down those who go against the system, this is about them believing this is the only way to keep the peace and safety of society because the HPSC does it like that. Also could be why strong quirk users have much hate towards them or are treated so greatly, because they are seen as being worth more and more capable.

It’s like a common thing (or I believe fairly common), for people to believe the ichor is toon blood! WHICH I AGREE!

BUT HEAR ME OUT.

The toons are made, or ichor. So when we buy toons and put in that ichor, that ichor is used to make and manufacture the toons.

The more ichor used, the more complex the toons become! It’s why the main characters are so expensive! Because they are so much more complex on a character level, that more ichor needs to be used to manufacture their abilities, personalities and skills.

Also why Shrimpo would be so cheap cause he’s pure rage and so one dimensional that the ichor used to manufacture him is so little.

For other toons that need research and everything or mastery and stuff, it could be because the ichor can’t fully encapsulate their personalities. Having the other things like research on the twisteds or mastery on other toons allows them to build up on the characters and develop them into who they are. Like Blot needing mastery of Yatta and Looey before he can be purchased with 3000 ichor because 1 - he works with them, so his character is tightly involved with them and they affect his personality 2- some of their skills also help to key in and manufacture his skills.

ESSENTIALLY MY THEORY IS:

1. Ichor is used to manufacture and make the toons. The more complex the toon, the more expensive they are because the more ichor is needed to manufacture and make up their personalities and skills

2. Some toons needing more than ichor to be bought is because they are either built up on preexisting toons and have similar traits that were solely taken from those toons, or are so closely involved with those other toons their characters are dependent and affected by them

As for Dandy and Dyle and why we can’t buy them other than the fact they are lethals? I got that covered too! Because the other toons exist on them. These other toons that aren’t the lethal toons, like Dandy or Dyle, were made to complement and interact with Dandy and Dyle, who are present, and research can be taken from them. But Dandy and Dyle were made to complement the toon handlers, Arthur and Delilah. TWO PEOPLE WHO AREN’T PRESENT. Due to the fact it’s would be impossible to get the research or the traits needed to make and manufacture the Dyle and Dandy, it’s essentially impossible to manufacture them or make replicas of them as compared with other toons!

TW: cannibalism…Mentions of murder, power imbalances and some other stuff I’ll try to label later.

I dunno this a random ramble, cause I remember the cannibalism as a metaphor for love, and then I saw a post of someone saying cannibalism is a better metaphor for obsession.

So I wonder about what cannibalism can be a metaphor for. These are just my thoughts, I might add to them.

Cannibalism as a metaphor for obsession (TW: For the obvious, cannibalism, murder and harm)

This desire to be so connected with a person you want to be consumed by them. To become part of them and to flow through their blood and literally become part of the energy that keeps them alive, or wanting to consume someone so you could keep them to yourself forever and ever, to have them with you at all times and to have them literally become part of your life source.

While some can see this as describing intense love, I personally see it as obsession. An obsession so intense you want to become one with the person, to consume them and take them apart. It can easily be a selfish act, as it results in the death and destruction of yourself or whom you love for your own gain and happiness.

I personally feel cannibalism (especially if you kill the person before you consume them…) as a metaphor for obsession works better. Because love doesn’t necessarily result in the death or destruction of one of the parties, but cannibalism does. Obsession can easily take a negative toll on both people, but especially the one who’s being obsessed over. Cannibalism is hurtful to the one who’s being consumed.

Cannibalism as a metaphor for hunger for power:

TW: Power imbalance, potential abuse/manipulation mentions

The idea of cannibalism to me, also includes consuming others for energy. When you eat someone, your body will digest and absorb any carbohydrates, fats, proteins, nutrients and minerals they provide you. They become a food source, an energy source. But aside from the literal sense of getting energy, you gain power over the people you consume. You force them into their worst positions for you to take advantage of and consume. You gain power physically (your own body being able to make use of the nutrients and substances the other person’s body provides), and you also gain power over the individual. You become the stronger one when you corner them to cannibalise them. You’re the stronger person, you’re the one with power. To take from a person till they are weak and vulnerable and continue to take all value from them…

I feel cannibalism does good as a metaphor for hunger of power. to consume people and their “strength”, and to gain power over them in the process. You become feared for what you’ve done, and that in turn makes you more powerful too.

Cannibalism as a metaphor of sustaining yourself

TW: Bodily harm, self-harm

Auto-cannibalism. Some people think of it as literally taking parts of your limbs off and eating them to survive in a dire situation, but auto cannibalism can also include consuming your own hair or your nails.

People never consider eating themselves unless it is a form of survival. Similarly, some people chew their nails or eat their own hair to soothe their anxiety.

In a way, cannibalism (specifically auto-cannibalism) can be seen as a metaphor of sustaining yourself. Is it a healthy way to sustain yourself? No. But it’s a way to sustain yourself and keep going. A character could have an obsession with one day needing to eat parts of their own body because they believe that is the only way they can potentially sustain themself one day. An acceptance to resort to auto-cannibalism to survive can be seen as a desire to sustain oneself even at the lost of parts of yourself as well.

Cannibalism as a metaphor for harmful desires

Tw: self-harm, harm towards others, bullying, assault mentions/implications, death, potential implications of suicide, power imbalances.

Cannibalism is always harmful, and will always cause some form of harm to the party being “cannibalised”.

So you could also logically say desires to hurt others or do horrible things to others or even yourself could be represented through cannibalism. You gain something through cannibalism, while the other part loses something.

for example, a bully in a story could refer to their victims as “meat” or a “meal”, because the bullies are literally preying and thriving off harming their victims, gaining more power and satisfaction over the people they bully, while the victims lose confidence and receive physical or mental harm, and potentially lose their lives from the bullying.

An abuser could similarly refer or see their victims as meat or food. The symbolism of cannibalism being shown in them preying and thriving off the suffering of their victims.

“eating someone” could be loosely seen as eating or thriving off the harm you cause them, or eating at their self confidence or esteem for your own personal gain.

Cannibalism as a metaphor for greed/gluttony

Tw: Single mention of murder

do you ever get so greedy or so gluttonous you’re willing to try anything and everything to chase after more satisfaction? To gain more and more satisfaction and joy to the point you are potentially willing to give a go at consuming someone else to see how it feels?

Cannibalism could be used as such a metaphor, with the craving and desire for more or an endless amount resulting in wanting to consume others around you to gain their material possessions or to keep gaining more and more whether it’s in terms of valuables, a body count (murder wise), or just to simply eat more and eat something no animal flesh or plant life can provide you.

Unfortunately, not as much. My interest basically vanished after I left the criminal case fandom, so I haven’t been doing any headcanon requests (sorry to all of you with unanswered requests…).