the fact that vivinos n qmeng had to make mizisua obviously toxic for people to realize that they aren't a healthy couple is crazy to me. anyways i love you sua 😍😍😍😍
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I'm curious, what was the process of diagnosis like for you?
(Me personally? I've been on the autism waiting list for over two years now 🙃)
Ugh the autism diagnosis waiting list situation is so bad 😭
It was long for me too. I tried to go through the NHS first - I tried to use the Right to Choose system to request an assessment with Psychiatry UK. The doctor told me Right to Choose isn't real or they don't do it at that surgery (which is false, everyone in England on the NHS has the legal right to choose your mental health care provider). I complained and eventually they agreed to put my request through and referred me for an initial assessment, which I had to wait several months for. I had the assessment, waited for ages for the results, only to find this was actually just for deciding if it's even worth putting me in for an Actual Autism Assessment. They decided it was, and THEN I got a letter saying the waiting list for my Real Assessment was 2 and a half years 😭
At that point I was extremely fed up and was really struggling so I ended up using my savings to go private - still with Psychiatry UK, just not through the NHS. I feel very lucky I was able to do that, I know for a lot of people it's just not an option.
I still had to wait but this was only a few months, and when I finally got to have my assessment she told me at the end that I was definitely autistic ❤️ I got the paperwork a bit later, but it was a real relief to have that confirmation after wondering for so long.
I'm sorry you're having a rough experience too! I think it's actually got worse since I went through it, which I didn't think was possible at the time 🙃 I hope you can get the answers you're looking for soon ❤️
oh my GOD I've known for about a month now that Disney was getting ready to go public with the Midjourney court case and it was SO HARD. TO STAY SILENT. all I've been able to do for like 2 years is go "trust me Disney is cooking something" and now it's finally starting.
like. I cannot emphasize enough how this is seriously going to destroy unethical LLMs. this isn't just about Midjourney, it's going to affect all the shitty art theft companies. they've been working on this a long time to ensure it's airtight.
Disney is evil, but for this battle, their interests align with ours. it's gonna be a long court case but at least we're finally gonna start seeing a shift now in regards to LLMs.
1) Disney will not be able to monopolize unethical LLMs bc they'll be illegal if Disney wins. legislation will need to be written to uphold the ruling.
-----------
EDIT: adding to this bc the techbro psyops found it and are trying to convince y'all this is a bad thing.
2) this is literally just Disney saying "LLMs should be subject to copyright law like everything else". only reason it wasn't is bc we didn't have it in legal writing yet. this court case will prompt it being written.
3) this means absolutely nothing else about copyright is changing. fair use, transformative work, and IP laws stay the same. nothing will change for anyone except techbro shills. we'll finally be protected from them.
4) I can't believe I have to say this but copyright is a good thing. it can be abused (there's room to criticize about HOW it's applied), but it's the only thing protecting small artists and individuals from their labor being stolen. anyone who whines about copyright as a whole being evil is a techbro who wants to steal your money and labor.
5) please. please remember copyright is completely separate from IP law. Disney will not be able to outlaw "style theft", that's still under fair use. their argument against LLMs lies solely in the fact that LLMs use the source material directly in computing an output, and is unable to create an output without said source material. this is how it's different from human-guided machines like digital art programs--those don't require copyright work to create any output.
6) not saying there's a 0% chance of something going wrong but there's a reason artists are excited about this. we have good reason to be optimistic. the court case is airtight--it fully refutes all arguments techbros make in defence of unethical LLMs.
7) being happy about Enemy 1 killing Enemy 2 does not mean anyone suddenly loves Enemy 1. nobody is celebrating Disney. we're celebrating LLMs losing. Disney being evil doesn't mean we can't be happy about Evil 2 dying.
At some point we're going to have to reckon with the fact that a lot of the stuff we're relying on as obvious tells of AI art are also simply common mistakes that human artists make. Not just amateur ones, either; I've literally seen one of the most celebrated comic artists in the business accidentally give a character two left hands.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
call me terminally academia-brained but i do think a lot of the fun of character analysis is figuring out how to build a compelling argument for a particular reading using lines of evidence from canon as well as meta/intertextual support
and you could say that what i’m saying here is basically “a lot of the fun of doing character analysis is doing character analysis” but let’s be real a lot of fandom character analysis is pretty heavily vibes-based. and i think that’s where i really chafe up against the traditional thought-terminating fandom attitude of like, everyone’s opinions hold equal weight and any interrogation of that is inherently hostile. because i think it’s fascinating to dig into where others are coming from in terms of their views on characters or dynamics or whatever, especially when they differ significantly from more commonly expressed views, and part of that digging is asking people okay what parts of canon are you drawing from to support your opinion? what parts of canon are you disregarding or downplaying? how does this argument hold up in the light of how race, gender, class, ability, etc. operate both in the piece’s in-fiction and real world contexts?
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The above is explaining three semantically similar statements with different connotations, in decreasing order of prevalence. In the early twenty-first century, native English speakers would understand the connotations implicitly, and would not need the detailed explanation of the above, which draws from the pattern.
In all cases, these statements serve as the prologue to some correction for a mistaken assumption, as explained above.
In the first case, the word "easy" is used to emphasize that the mistake is common, natural, and understandable, and that there is no shame for being mistaken on the given matter of topic. This is a very common turn of phrase.
In the second case, the word "tempting" is used to emphasize that the mistake is born out of some desirable motive. The biases that caused one to form the mistaken assumption as potentially sympathetic to the corrector. This is an less common, but known, turn of phrase, implying a harsher critique.
In the third case, the word "comforting" is used to emphasize that that the only reason someone is making an assumption is because they are coddling their own biases, even though any attempt at thinking things through would prove it irrational. It is the equivalent of accusing someone of sticking their head in the sand, like an allegorical ostrich. "Read for filth" is an idiomatic expression meaning to offer full, unfiltered criticism of something, ripping it apart. This is even less common to use, but the point would be understood as being a prelude to the harshest criticism of the three.
i sort of interpret the fact that mizi’s eyes were taken is because eyes are like… a window to the soul usually? and the industry has literally stripped her of her individuality, her passions, and well her soul. so it makes sense why her eyes were taken too. i mean besides the fact that her fans (all old men) only care about her body and not like her face and how deformed her face has become. it makes the most sense they were taken. i’m not too good at analyzing things sometimes but i do think it was interesting symbolism(?)
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
jbbartram-illu
2087
origamiaround
dededos
germansingergirl
turnnoffyourmind
