According to Solnit’s metaphors… I have always been more interested in ruins, though perhaps interested is not quite the right word, that would imply choice, a sense of democracy, like I could come to conclusions having weighed the logic of each.
There is nothing logical at first glance, about being drawn to the darkness, the unknown, memory as a landscape that I cannot seem to fully inhabit. But I am drawn, regardless.
Is it that something of my own nature resides there? If naming it runs the risk of having to un-learn a paradigm, an attempt at imposing order, not naming it leaves it perpetually unknown.
The liminal is what I call it, the way it encapsulates orientation, though not as a sense of direction. There’s less a choice than a kind of resonance. Liminal, by definition, is not point a or point b, it has no ground and no anchor.
Perhaps, because the logic of being drawn to something that is meant to reside out of frame, out of view, is something that takes years to unfold. When the path is muddy and you detour, trek through the bushes instead, and then other hikers appear, going the other way, one of them offers assistance by way of asking you if you know where you’re going. You smile, eyes carefully pinned to your next steps as you say yes, I do, not without a little effort, and the humour of the situation lingers and then trails you a little.
The question lingers too. Do I know where I’m going?
Anyway, Solnit, bless her, brings the abstract into concrete language —
“A city is built to resemble a conscious mind, a network that can calculate, administrate, manufacture. Ruins become the unconscious of a city, its memory, unknown, darkness, lost lands, and in this truly bring it to life. With ruins a city springs free of its plans into something as intricate as life, something that can be explored but perhaps not mapped. This is the same transmutation spoken of in fairy tales when statues and toys and animals become human, though they come to life and with ruin a city comes to death, but a generative death like the corpse that feeds flowers. An urban ruin is a place that has fallen outside the economic life of the city, and it is in some way an ideal home for the art that also falls outside the ordinary production and consumption of the city.”