tag yourself, I'm "(m) those that have just broken a flower vase"
Not today Justin
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸


Discoholic 🪩
RMH
🪼
art blog(derogatory)

Product Placement
styofa doing anything

Kaledo Art
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Today's Document

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
NASA
Claire Keane

seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from France
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Belgium
seen from Argentina
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from Belarus

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Australia

seen from United States
@lipamanka
tag yourself, I'm "(m) those that have just broken a flower vase"

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
RELIGION IS STILL GOOD EVEN IF GOD DOESN'T EXIST
why religion is good, but it doesn't matter which one
I'm Jewish. I myself functionally have one religion. The ritual and beliefs I use in my day to day life are, when religious, Jewish. But I still get a lot out of reading scripture from other religions.
A lot of atheists say stuff like this: "Why would I need a religion to tell me that murder is wrong? I already know that, it's obvious. I don't need religion to tell me that." And this is accurate, a particular belief in the supernatural is not necessary to know that killing is bad.
But there are far more life lessons beyond the basics. How do we prevent harming others? How do we protect the people we care about? What actions do we do that hurt other human beings? Why should we want to not cause harm to others? How do we help others overcome their struggles? How do we overcome our own struggles?
I don't think younger atheists have the answers to these questions because they have cut themselves off from the ability to learn from the way the human race keeps track of wisdom. That's what religion's greatest function is: a way to keep track of wisdom. Many atheists cut themselves off from the wisdom present within a religion just because it is from a religion.
I have gone to several Christian Sunday services (like maybe seven?), all Presbyterian. I've always left them a wiser person. I'm not Christian, and the scripture they discuss means very little to me on a spiritual level, but the wisdom is meaningful.
For example, once the chaplain talked about how Thomas doubted Jesus Christ's resurrection until he could feel the zounds (his crucifixion wounds) themselves. Really, this story isn't just about blindly following Jesus. It's about trusting friends. Thomas was a close friend of Jesus's, and he didn't trust his friend when he should have. He didn't realize how meaningful his trust would have been to Jesus when he withheld it. He didn't realize that his skepticism directed at his friend was hurting him.
John 20:29 KJV - Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, "because thou hast seem me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they who have not seen, and yet have believed.
In other words, blessed are those who trust their friends.
After that service, I was a wiser person, for I had learned that my friends value my trust in them, and that the words "I trust you" hold great power. This isn't nearly as obvious as "don't kill people." This kind of wisdom is sitting for us in religious scripture, no matter what the religion actually is. There's even a genre called "wisdom poetry." It's not even universally religious. I'm sure there's secular wisdom poetry. But:
Atheists need a good source of wisdom. Even if they don't believe in the divine, the writings of those who do would do them well to read.
This isn't to say all scripture is good for this. Like I wouldn't recommend most of Leviticus or Joshua to an atheist for learning. I'd probably recommend Proverbs or Ecclesiastes for that. But we should all be dedicating some portion of our week to the wisdom worked out by those who come before us.
Is there any reason why philosophy cannot also accomplish this? Is there any moral wisdom that only religion can uniquely deliver?
it absolutely can! but also i feel like philosophy is less about preserving the wisdom of ages and more about thinking about thinking. like everyone benefits from wisdom, but not everyone benefits from philosophy, no? though I could be wrong, I'm not all that into philosophy.
The "wisdom of ages" like persecuting women and minorities? Philosophy is the evolution of wisdom because it can't get away with cop-out divine justifications of terrible self-contradictory ideas. It must stand on its own.
I would not call persecuting women adn minorities "wisdom of the ages," no. people should be critical of the ancient wisdom they consume obviously. wisdom is not to be followed without thought. it is to be contemplated.
Does the marginal benefit of some wisdom to a small number of believers justify the tsunami of suffering inflicted by religion on women, minorities, and the vulnerable?
I do not think religion can be classified as good if it offers a replaceable benefit to a small group while inflicting great harm on a much larger group.
i think you are mixing up "religon causes suffering" with "there exist religious people and organizations that cause suffering." like surely if Joe Christian kills someone in the name of Jesus, the onus is on Joe Christian, not the religion, no?
If a religious institution deprives women and minorities of rights and authority because of precepts in the text, that's on the religion.
That absolves the people and institutions that cause harm of responsibility for the harm they cause.
No it doesn't. They just easily leverage religion as a tool because the hateful ideas are built-in, and they are easily justified in the name of God. The wicked easily leverage religion because it has plenty of paranoid, hateful, and tribal ideas and unchallengable divine justification.
I mean like pragmatically it does. for example, there exist people who blame christianity for the holocaust and not hitler and the nazis. this is a real thing that happens where people blame the actions of people on a religion and it takes away from the person's responsibility for the action.
also religions are not as concrete as you think. there's always so much scripture that you have to cherry pick it, and there's a moral prerogative to do so in a way that benefits marginalized people. throughout history there have always been people who have done this. the essenians were anti-slavery when mainstream second temple judaism normalized it, for example, and that was two thousand years ago. religion is not monolithable enough to say that ANYTHING is built in.
now the scripture of the majority of religions, on the other hand, has both wisdom and oppression built in. it is entirely possible to benefit from the wisdom while being critical of the oppression. I have yet to see them overlap or intertwine. any oppressive scripture is not useful wisdom and should be discarded (and very frequently is by religious people!)
like how can you say that the deeds of bad people are the fault of the religion when there exist people who follow the religion with the same amount of zeal, but have not done bad deeds? those people exist. if you don't think they do, then we fundamentally disagree about what is real and what is not and there is no reason to continue this back and forth.
I've been studying religion basically nonstop for 7 years. I know that it's not a monolith. I used to have more patience for it. Does it make sense to assign full accountability of a believer's actions to religion? No, but religion generally invites much more trouble than it's worth. It invites nonfactual and magical thinking, and it allows for the efficient justification of hatred and violence. It's not a net positive for the world today.
I've been studying religion basically nonstop for 9 years so that means I win the argument I think?
Maybe 9 more will get you there.
study religion for two more years before you lecture me about anything related to religion. because clearly amount of time studying religion gives way to the best opinions. remember, I won the argument already, right?
RELIGION IS STILL GOOD EVEN IF GOD DOESN'T EXIST
why religion is good, but it doesn't matter which one
I'm Jewish. I myself functionally have one religion. The ritual and beliefs I use in my day to day life are, when religious, Jewish. But I still get a lot out of reading scripture from other religions.
A lot of atheists say stuff like this: "Why would I need a religion to tell me that murder is wrong? I already know that, it's obvious. I don't need religion to tell me that." And this is accurate, a particular belief in the supernatural is not necessary to know that killing is bad.
But there are far more life lessons beyond the basics. How do we prevent harming others? How do we protect the people we care about? What actions do we do that hurt other human beings? Why should we want to not cause harm to others? How do we help others overcome their struggles? How do we overcome our own struggles?
I don't think younger atheists have the answers to these questions because they have cut themselves off from the ability to learn from the way the human race keeps track of wisdom. That's what religion's greatest function is: a way to keep track of wisdom. Many atheists cut themselves off from the wisdom present within a religion just because it is from a religion.
I have gone to several Christian Sunday services (like maybe seven?), all Presbyterian. I've always left them a wiser person. I'm not Christian, and the scripture they discuss means very little to me on a spiritual level, but the wisdom is meaningful.
For example, once the chaplain talked about how Thomas doubted Jesus Christ's resurrection until he could feel the zounds (his crucifixion wounds) themselves. Really, this story isn't just about blindly following Jesus. It's about trusting friends. Thomas was a close friend of Jesus's, and he didn't trust his friend when he should have. He didn't realize how meaningful his trust would have been to Jesus when he withheld it. He didn't realize that his skepticism directed at his friend was hurting him.
John 20:29 KJV - Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, "because thou hast seem me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they who have not seen, and yet have believed.
In other words, blessed are those who trust their friends.
After that service, I was a wiser person, for I had learned that my friends value my trust in them, and that the words "I trust you" hold great power. This isn't nearly as obvious as "don't kill people." This kind of wisdom is sitting for us in religious scripture, no matter what the religion actually is. There's even a genre called "wisdom poetry." It's not even universally religious. I'm sure there's secular wisdom poetry. But:
Atheists need a good source of wisdom. Even if they don't believe in the divine, the writings of those who do would do them well to read.
This isn't to say all scripture is good for this. Like I wouldn't recommend most of Leviticus or Joshua to an atheist for learning. I'd probably recommend Proverbs or Ecclesiastes for that. But we should all be dedicating some portion of our week to the wisdom worked out by those who come before us.
Is there any reason why philosophy cannot also accomplish this? Is there any moral wisdom that only religion can uniquely deliver?
it absolutely can! but also i feel like philosophy is less about preserving the wisdom of ages and more about thinking about thinking. like everyone benefits from wisdom, but not everyone benefits from philosophy, no? though I could be wrong, I'm not all that into philosophy.
The "wisdom of ages" like persecuting women and minorities? Philosophy is the evolution of wisdom because it can't get away with cop-out divine justifications of terrible self-contradictory ideas. It must stand on its own.
I would not call persecuting women adn minorities "wisdom of the ages," no. people should be critical of the ancient wisdom they consume obviously. wisdom is not to be followed without thought. it is to be contemplated.
Does the marginal benefit of some wisdom to a small number of believers justify the tsunami of suffering inflicted by religion on women, minorities, and the vulnerable?
I do not think religion can be classified as good if it offers a replaceable benefit to a small group while inflicting great harm on a much larger group.
i think you are mixing up "religon causes suffering" with "there exist religious people and organizations that cause suffering." like surely if Joe Christian kills someone in the name of Jesus, the onus is on Joe Christian, not the religion, no?
If a religious institution deprives women and minorities of rights and authority because of precepts in the text, that's on the religion.
That absolves the people and institutions that cause harm of responsibility for the harm they cause.
No it doesn't. They just easily leverage religion as a tool because the hateful ideas are built-in, and they are easily justified in the name of God. The wicked easily leverage religion because it has plenty of paranoid, hateful, and tribal ideas and unchallengable divine justification.
I mean like pragmatically it does. for example, there exist people who blame christianity for the holocaust and not hitler and the nazis. this is a real thing that happens where people blame the actions of people on a religion and it takes away from the person's responsibility for the action.
also religions are not as concrete as you think. there's always so much scripture that you have to cherry pick it, and there's a moral prerogative to do so in a way that benefits marginalized people. throughout history there have always been people who have done this. the essenians were anti-slavery when mainstream second temple judaism normalized it, for example, and that was two thousand years ago. religion is not monolithable enough to say that ANYTHING is built in.
now the scripture of the majority of religions, on the other hand, has both wisdom and oppression built in. it is entirely possible to benefit from the wisdom while being critical of the oppression. I have yet to see them overlap or intertwine. any oppressive scripture is not useful wisdom and should be discarded (and very frequently is by religious people!)
like how can you say that the deeds of bad people are the fault of the religion when there exist people who follow the religion with the same amount of zeal, but have not done bad deeds? those people exist. if you don't think they do, then we fundamentally disagree about what is real and what is not and there is no reason to continue this back and forth.
I've been studying religion basically nonstop for 7 years. I know that it's not a monolith. I used to have more patience for it. Does it make sense to assign full accountability of a believer's actions to religion? No, but religion generally invites much more trouble than it's worth. It invites nonfactual and magical thinking, and it allows for the efficient justification of hatred and violence. It's not a net positive for the world today.
I've been studying religion basically nonstop for 9 years so that means I win the argument I think?
RELIGION IS STILL GOOD EVEN IF GOD DOESN'T EXIST
why religion is good, but it doesn't matter which one
I'm Jewish. I myself functionally have one religion. The ritual and beliefs I use in my day to day life are, when religious, Jewish. But I still get a lot out of reading scripture from other religions.
A lot of atheists say stuff like this: "Why would I need a religion to tell me that murder is wrong? I already know that, it's obvious. I don't need religion to tell me that." And this is accurate, a particular belief in the supernatural is not necessary to know that killing is bad.
But there are far more life lessons beyond the basics. How do we prevent harming others? How do we protect the people we care about? What actions do we do that hurt other human beings? Why should we want to not cause harm to others? How do we help others overcome their struggles? How do we overcome our own struggles?
I don't think younger atheists have the answers to these questions because they have cut themselves off from the ability to learn from the way the human race keeps track of wisdom. That's what religion's greatest function is: a way to keep track of wisdom. Many atheists cut themselves off from the wisdom present within a religion just because it is from a religion.
I have gone to several Christian Sunday services (like maybe seven?), all Presbyterian. I've always left them a wiser person. I'm not Christian, and the scripture they discuss means very little to me on a spiritual level, but the wisdom is meaningful.
For example, once the chaplain talked about how Thomas doubted Jesus Christ's resurrection until he could feel the zounds (his crucifixion wounds) themselves. Really, this story isn't just about blindly following Jesus. It's about trusting friends. Thomas was a close friend of Jesus's, and he didn't trust his friend when he should have. He didn't realize how meaningful his trust would have been to Jesus when he withheld it. He didn't realize that his skepticism directed at his friend was hurting him.
John 20:29 KJV - Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, "because thou hast seem me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they who have not seen, and yet have believed.
In other words, blessed are those who trust their friends.
After that service, I was a wiser person, for I had learned that my friends value my trust in them, and that the words "I trust you" hold great power. This isn't nearly as obvious as "don't kill people." This kind of wisdom is sitting for us in religious scripture, no matter what the religion actually is. There's even a genre called "wisdom poetry." It's not even universally religious. I'm sure there's secular wisdom poetry. But:
Atheists need a good source of wisdom. Even if they don't believe in the divine, the writings of those who do would do them well to read.
This isn't to say all scripture is good for this. Like I wouldn't recommend most of Leviticus or Joshua to an atheist for learning. I'd probably recommend Proverbs or Ecclesiastes for that. But we should all be dedicating some portion of our week to the wisdom worked out by those who come before us.
Is there any reason why philosophy cannot also accomplish this? Is there any moral wisdom that only religion can uniquely deliver?
it absolutely can! but also i feel like philosophy is less about preserving the wisdom of ages and more about thinking about thinking. like everyone benefits from wisdom, but not everyone benefits from philosophy, no? though I could be wrong, I'm not all that into philosophy.
The "wisdom of ages" like persecuting women and minorities? Philosophy is the evolution of wisdom because it can't get away with cop-out divine justifications of terrible self-contradictory ideas. It must stand on its own.
I would not call persecuting women adn minorities "wisdom of the ages," no. people should be critical of the ancient wisdom they consume obviously. wisdom is not to be followed without thought. it is to be contemplated.
Does the marginal benefit of some wisdom to a small number of believers justify the tsunami of suffering inflicted by religion on women, minorities, and the vulnerable?
I do not think religion can be classified as good if it offers a replaceable benefit to a small group while inflicting great harm on a much larger group.
i think you are mixing up "religon causes suffering" with "there exist religious people and organizations that cause suffering." like surely if Joe Christian kills someone in the name of Jesus, the onus is on Joe Christian, not the religion, no?
If a religious institution deprives women and minorities of rights and authority because of precepts in the text, that's on the religion.
That absolves the people and institutions that cause harm of responsibility for the harm they cause.
No it doesn't. They just easily leverage religion as a tool because the hateful ideas are built-in, and they are easily justified in the name of God. The wicked easily leverage religion because it has plenty of paranoid, hateful, and tribal ideas and unchallengable divine justification.
I mean like pragmatically it does. for example, there exist people who blame christianity for the holocaust and not hitler and the nazis. this is a real thing that happens where people blame the actions of people on a religion and it takes away from the person's responsibility for the action.
also religions are not as concrete as you think. there's always so much scripture that you have to cherry pick it, and there's a moral prerogative to do so in a way that benefits marginalized people. throughout history there have always been people who have done this. the essenians were anti-slavery when mainstream second temple judaism normalized it, for example, and that was two thousand years ago. religion is not monolithable enough to say that ANYTHING is built in.
now the scripture of the majority of religions, on the other hand, has both wisdom and oppression built in. it is entirely possible to benefit from the wisdom while being critical of the oppression. I have yet to see them overlap or intertwine. any oppressive scripture is not useful wisdom and should be discarded (and very frequently is by religious people!)
like how can you say that the deeds of bad people are the fault of the religion when there exist people who follow the religion with the same amount of zeal, but have not done bad deeds? those people exist. if you don't think they do, then we fundamentally disagree about what is real and what is not and there is no reason to continue this back and forth.
RELIGION IS STILL GOOD EVEN IF GOD DOESN'T EXIST
why religion is good, but it doesn't matter which one
I'm Jewish. I myself functionally have one religion. The ritual and beliefs I use in my day to day life are, when religious, Jewish. But I still get a lot out of reading scripture from other religions.
A lot of atheists say stuff like this: "Why would I need a religion to tell me that murder is wrong? I already know that, it's obvious. I don't need religion to tell me that." And this is accurate, a particular belief in the supernatural is not necessary to know that killing is bad.
But there are far more life lessons beyond the basics. How do we prevent harming others? How do we protect the people we care about? What actions do we do that hurt other human beings? Why should we want to not cause harm to others? How do we help others overcome their struggles? How do we overcome our own struggles?
I don't think younger atheists have the answers to these questions because they have cut themselves off from the ability to learn from the way the human race keeps track of wisdom. That's what religion's greatest function is: a way to keep track of wisdom. Many atheists cut themselves off from the wisdom present within a religion just because it is from a religion.
I have gone to several Christian Sunday services (like maybe seven?), all Presbyterian. I've always left them a wiser person. I'm not Christian, and the scripture they discuss means very little to me on a spiritual level, but the wisdom is meaningful.
For example, once the chaplain talked about how Thomas doubted Jesus Christ's resurrection until he could feel the zounds (his crucifixion wounds) themselves. Really, this story isn't just about blindly following Jesus. It's about trusting friends. Thomas was a close friend of Jesus's, and he didn't trust his friend when he should have. He didn't realize how meaningful his trust would have been to Jesus when he withheld it. He didn't realize that his skepticism directed at his friend was hurting him.
John 20:29 KJV - Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, "because thou hast seem me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they who have not seen, and yet have believed.
In other words, blessed are those who trust their friends.
After that service, I was a wiser person, for I had learned that my friends value my trust in them, and that the words "I trust you" hold great power. This isn't nearly as obvious as "don't kill people." This kind of wisdom is sitting for us in religious scripture, no matter what the religion actually is. There's even a genre called "wisdom poetry." It's not even universally religious. I'm sure there's secular wisdom poetry. But:
Atheists need a good source of wisdom. Even if they don't believe in the divine, the writings of those who do would do them well to read.
This isn't to say all scripture is good for this. Like I wouldn't recommend most of Leviticus or Joshua to an atheist for learning. I'd probably recommend Proverbs or Ecclesiastes for that. But we should all be dedicating some portion of our week to the wisdom worked out by those who come before us.
Is there any reason why philosophy cannot also accomplish this? Is there any moral wisdom that only religion can uniquely deliver?
it absolutely can! but also i feel like philosophy is less about preserving the wisdom of ages and more about thinking about thinking. like everyone benefits from wisdom, but not everyone benefits from philosophy, no? though I could be wrong, I'm not all that into philosophy.
The "wisdom of ages" like persecuting women and minorities? Philosophy is the evolution of wisdom because it can't get away with cop-out divine justifications of terrible self-contradictory ideas. It must stand on its own.
I would not call persecuting women adn minorities "wisdom of the ages," no. people should be critical of the ancient wisdom they consume obviously. wisdom is not to be followed without thought. it is to be contemplated.
Does the marginal benefit of some wisdom to a small number of believers justify the tsunami of suffering inflicted by religion on women, minorities, and the vulnerable?
I do not think religion can be classified as good if it offers a replaceable benefit to a small group while inflicting great harm on a much larger group.
i think you are mixing up "religon causes suffering" with "there exist religious people and organizations that cause suffering." like surely if Joe Christian kills someone in the name of Jesus, the onus is on Joe Christian, not the religion, no?
If a religious institution deprives women and minorities of rights and authority because of precepts in the text, that's on the religion.
That absolves the people and institutions that cause harm of responsibility for the harm they cause.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I need everybody in this trying time to take a deep breath and be with me as I practice mindfulness and kind responsible mature reactions to things #theonlythingyoucanchangeisyourreaction
you are an inspiration bugs
RELIGION IS STILL GOOD EVEN IF GOD DOESN'T EXIST
why religion is good, but it doesn't matter which one
I'm Jewish. I myself functionally have one religion. The ritual and beliefs I use in my day to day life are, when religious, Jewish. But I still get a lot out of reading scripture from other religions.
A lot of atheists say stuff like this: "Why would I need a religion to tell me that murder is wrong? I already know that, it's obvious. I don't need religion to tell me that." And this is accurate, a particular belief in the supernatural is not necessary to know that killing is bad.
But there are far more life lessons beyond the basics. How do we prevent harming others? How do we protect the people we care about? What actions do we do that hurt other human beings? Why should we want to not cause harm to others? How do we help others overcome their struggles? How do we overcome our own struggles?
I don't think younger atheists have the answers to these questions because they have cut themselves off from the ability to learn from the way the human race keeps track of wisdom. That's what religion's greatest function is: a way to keep track of wisdom. Many atheists cut themselves off from the wisdom present within a religion just because it is from a religion.
I have gone to several Christian Sunday services (like maybe seven?), all Presbyterian. I've always left them a wiser person. I'm not Christian, and the scripture they discuss means very little to me on a spiritual level, but the wisdom is meaningful.
For example, once the chaplain talked about how Thomas doubted Jesus Christ's resurrection until he could feel the zounds (his crucifixion wounds) themselves. Really, this story isn't just about blindly following Jesus. It's about trusting friends. Thomas was a close friend of Jesus's, and he didn't trust his friend when he should have. He didn't realize how meaningful his trust would have been to Jesus when he withheld it. He didn't realize that his skepticism directed at his friend was hurting him.
John 20:29 KJV - Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, "because thou hast seem me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they who have not seen, and yet have believed.
In other words, blessed are those who trust their friends.
After that service, I was a wiser person, for I had learned that my friends value my trust in them, and that the words "I trust you" hold great power. This isn't nearly as obvious as "don't kill people." This kind of wisdom is sitting for us in religious scripture, no matter what the religion actually is. There's even a genre called "wisdom poetry." It's not even universally religious. I'm sure there's secular wisdom poetry. But:
Atheists need a good source of wisdom. Even if they don't believe in the divine, the writings of those who do would do them well to read.
This isn't to say all scripture is good for this. Like I wouldn't recommend most of Leviticus or Joshua to an atheist for learning. I'd probably recommend Proverbs or Ecclesiastes for that. But we should all be dedicating some portion of our week to the wisdom worked out by those who come before us.
Is there any reason why philosophy cannot also accomplish this? Is there any moral wisdom that only religion can uniquely deliver?
it absolutely can! but also i feel like philosophy is less about preserving the wisdom of ages and more about thinking about thinking. like everyone benefits from wisdom, but not everyone benefits from philosophy, no? though I could be wrong, I'm not all that into philosophy.
The "wisdom of ages" like persecuting women and minorities? Philosophy is the evolution of wisdom because it can't get away with cop-out divine justifications of terrible self-contradictory ideas. It must stand on its own.
I would not call persecuting women adn minorities "wisdom of the ages," no. people should be critical of the ancient wisdom they consume obviously. wisdom is not to be followed without thought. it is to be contemplated.
Does the marginal benefit of some wisdom to a small number of believers justify the tsunami of suffering inflicted by religion on women, minorities, and the vulnerable?
I do not think religion can be classified as good if it offers a replaceable benefit to a small group while inflicting great harm on a much larger group.
i think you are mixing up "religon causes suffering" with "there exist religious people and organizations that cause suffering." like surely if Joe Christian kills someone in the name of Jesus, the onus is on Joe Christian, not the religion, no?
RELIGION IS STILL GOOD EVEN IF GOD DOESN'T EXIST
why religion is good, but it doesn't matter which one
I'm Jewish. I myself functionally have one religion. The ritual and beliefs I use in my day to day life are, when religious, Jewish. But I still get a lot out of reading scripture from other religions.
A lot of atheists say stuff like this: "Why would I need a religion to tell me that murder is wrong? I already know that, it's obvious. I don't need religion to tell me that." And this is accurate, a particular belief in the supernatural is not necessary to know that killing is bad.
But there are far more life lessons beyond the basics. How do we prevent harming others? How do we protect the people we care about? What actions do we do that hurt other human beings? Why should we want to not cause harm to others? How do we help others overcome their struggles? How do we overcome our own struggles?
I don't think younger atheists have the answers to these questions because they have cut themselves off from the ability to learn from the way the human race keeps track of wisdom. That's what religion's greatest function is: a way to keep track of wisdom. Many atheists cut themselves off from the wisdom present within a religion just because it is from a religion.
I have gone to several Christian Sunday services (like maybe seven?), all Presbyterian. I've always left them a wiser person. I'm not Christian, and the scripture they discuss means very little to me on a spiritual level, but the wisdom is meaningful.
For example, once the chaplain talked about how Thomas doubted Jesus Christ's resurrection until he could feel the zounds (his crucifixion wounds) themselves. Really, this story isn't just about blindly following Jesus. It's about trusting friends. Thomas was a close friend of Jesus's, and he didn't trust his friend when he should have. He didn't realize how meaningful his trust would have been to Jesus when he withheld it. He didn't realize that his skepticism directed at his friend was hurting him.
John 20:29 KJV - Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, "because thou hast seem me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they who have not seen, and yet have believed.
In other words, blessed are those who trust their friends.
After that service, I was a wiser person, for I had learned that my friends value my trust in them, and that the words "I trust you" hold great power. This isn't nearly as obvious as "don't kill people." This kind of wisdom is sitting for us in religious scripture, no matter what the religion actually is. There's even a genre called "wisdom poetry." It's not even universally religious. I'm sure there's secular wisdom poetry. But:
Atheists need a good source of wisdom. Even if they don't believe in the divine, the writings of those who do would do them well to read.
This isn't to say all scripture is good for this. Like I wouldn't recommend most of Leviticus or Joshua to an atheist for learning. I'd probably recommend Proverbs or Ecclesiastes for that. But we should all be dedicating some portion of our week to the wisdom worked out by those who come before us.
Is there any reason why philosophy cannot also accomplish this? Is there any moral wisdom that only religion can uniquely deliver?
it absolutely can! but also i feel like philosophy is less about preserving the wisdom of ages and more about thinking about thinking. like everyone benefits from wisdom, but not everyone benefits from philosophy, no? though I could be wrong, I'm not all that into philosophy.
The "wisdom of ages" like persecuting women and minorities? Philosophy is the evolution of wisdom because it can't get away with cop-out divine justifications of terrible self-contradictory ideas. It must stand on its own.
I would not call persecuting women adn minorities "wisdom of the ages," no. people should be critical of the ancient wisdom they consume obviously. wisdom is not to be followed without thought. it is to be contemplated.
Does the marginal benefit of some wisdom to a small number of believers justify the tsunami of suffering inflicted by religion on women, minorities, and the vulnerable?
I do not think religion can be classified as good if it offers a replaceable benefit to a small group while inflicting great harm on a much larger group.
okay i know more than most people do about this but what the FUCK is going on in the toki pona community
RELIGION IS STILL GOOD EVEN IF GOD DOESN'T EXIST
why religion is good, but it doesn't matter which one
I'm Jewish. I myself functionally have one religion. The ritual and beliefs I use in my day to day life are, when religious, Jewish. But I still get a lot out of reading scripture from other religions.
A lot of atheists say stuff like this: "Why would I need a religion to tell me that murder is wrong? I already know that, it's obvious. I don't need religion to tell me that." And this is accurate, a particular belief in the supernatural is not necessary to know that killing is bad.
But there are far more life lessons beyond the basics. How do we prevent harming others? How do we protect the people we care about? What actions do we do that hurt other human beings? Why should we want to not cause harm to others? How do we help others overcome their struggles? How do we overcome our own struggles?
I don't think younger atheists have the answers to these questions because they have cut themselves off from the ability to learn from the way the human race keeps track of wisdom. That's what religion's greatest function is: a way to keep track of wisdom. Many atheists cut themselves off from the wisdom present within a religion just because it is from a religion.
I have gone to several Christian Sunday services (like maybe seven?), all Presbyterian. I've always left them a wiser person. I'm not Christian, and the scripture they discuss means very little to me on a spiritual level, but the wisdom is meaningful.
For example, once the chaplain talked about how Thomas doubted Jesus Christ's resurrection until he could feel the zounds (his crucifixion wounds) themselves. Really, this story isn't just about blindly following Jesus. It's about trusting friends. Thomas was a close friend of Jesus's, and he didn't trust his friend when he should have. He didn't realize how meaningful his trust would have been to Jesus when he withheld it. He didn't realize that his skepticism directed at his friend was hurting him.
John 20:29 KJV - Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, "because thou hast seem me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they who have not seen, and yet have believed.
In other words, blessed are those who trust their friends.
After that service, I was a wiser person, for I had learned that my friends value my trust in them, and that the words "I trust you" hold great power. This isn't nearly as obvious as "don't kill people." This kind of wisdom is sitting for us in religious scripture, no matter what the religion actually is. There's even a genre called "wisdom poetry." It's not even universally religious. I'm sure there's secular wisdom poetry. But:
Atheists need a good source of wisdom. Even if they don't believe in the divine, the writings of those who do would do them well to read.
This isn't to say all scripture is good for this. Like I wouldn't recommend most of Leviticus or Joshua to an atheist for learning. I'd probably recommend Proverbs or Ecclesiastes for that. But we should all be dedicating some portion of our week to the wisdom worked out by those who come before us.
Is there any reason why philosophy cannot also accomplish this? Is there any moral wisdom that only religion can uniquely deliver?
it absolutely can! but also i feel like philosophy is less about preserving the wisdom of ages and more about thinking about thinking. like everyone benefits from wisdom, but not everyone benefits from philosophy, no? though I could be wrong, I'm not all that into philosophy.
The "wisdom of ages" like persecuting women and minorities? Philosophy is the evolution of wisdom because it can't get away with cop-out divine justifications of terrible self-contradictory ideas. It must stand on its own.
I would not call persecuting women adn minorities "wisdom of the ages," no. people should be critical of the ancient wisdom they consume obviously. wisdom is not to be followed without thought. it is to be contemplated.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
RELIGION IS STILL GOOD EVEN IF GOD DOESN'T EXIST
why religion is good, but it doesn't matter which one
I'm Jewish. I myself functionally have one religion. The ritual and beliefs I use in my day to day life are, when religious, Jewish. But I still get a lot out of reading scripture from other religions.
A lot of atheists say stuff like this: "Why would I need a religion to tell me that murder is wrong? I already know that, it's obvious. I don't need religion to tell me that." And this is accurate, a particular belief in the supernatural is not necessary to know that killing is bad.
But there are far more life lessons beyond the basics. How do we prevent harming others? How do we protect the people we care about? What actions do we do that hurt other human beings? Why should we want to not cause harm to others? How do we help others overcome their struggles? How do we overcome our own struggles?
I don't think younger atheists have the answers to these questions because they have cut themselves off from the ability to learn from the way the human race keeps track of wisdom. That's what religion's greatest function is: a way to keep track of wisdom. Many atheists cut themselves off from the wisdom present within a religion just because it is from a religion.
I have gone to several Christian Sunday services (like maybe seven?), all Presbyterian. I've always left them a wiser person. I'm not Christian, and the scripture they discuss means very little to me on a spiritual level, but the wisdom is meaningful.
For example, once the chaplain talked about how Thomas doubted Jesus Christ's resurrection until he could feel the zounds (his crucifixion wounds) themselves. Really, this story isn't just about blindly following Jesus. It's about trusting friends. Thomas was a close friend of Jesus's, and he didn't trust his friend when he should have. He didn't realize how meaningful his trust would have been to Jesus when he withheld it. He didn't realize that his skepticism directed at his friend was hurting him.
John 20:29 KJV - Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, "because thou hast seem me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they who have not seen, and yet have believed.
In other words, blessed are those who trust their friends.
After that service, I was a wiser person, for I had learned that my friends value my trust in them, and that the words "I trust you" hold great power. This isn't nearly as obvious as "don't kill people." This kind of wisdom is sitting for us in religious scripture, no matter what the religion actually is. There's even a genre called "wisdom poetry." It's not even universally religious. I'm sure there's secular wisdom poetry. But:
Atheists need a good source of wisdom. Even if they don't believe in the divine, the writings of those who do would do them well to read.
This isn't to say all scripture is good for this. Like I wouldn't recommend most of Leviticus or Joshua to an atheist for learning. I'd probably recommend Proverbs or Ecclesiastes for that. But we should all be dedicating some portion of our week to the wisdom worked out by those who come before us.
Is there any reason why philosophy cannot also accomplish this? Is there any moral wisdom that only religion can uniquely deliver?
it absolutely can! but also i feel like philosophy is less about preserving the wisdom of ages and more about thinking about thinking. like everyone benefits from wisdom, but not everyone benefits from philosophy, no? though I could be wrong, I'm not all that into philosophy.
RELIGION IS STILL GOOD EVEN IF GOD DOESN'T EXIST
why religion is good, but it doesn't matter which one
I'm Jewish. I myself functionally have one religion. The ritual and beliefs I use in my day to day life are, when religious, Jewish. But I still get a lot out of reading scripture from other religions.
A lot of atheists say stuff like this: "Why would I need a religion to tell me that murder is wrong? I already know that, it's obvious. I don't need religion to tell me that." And this is accurate, a particular belief in the supernatural is not necessary to know that killing is bad.
But there are far more life lessons beyond the basics. How do we prevent harming others? How do we protect the people we care about? What actions do we do that hurt other human beings? Why should we want to not cause harm to others? How do we help others overcome their struggles? How do we overcome our own struggles?
I don't think younger atheists have the answers to these questions because they have cut themselves off from the ability to learn from the way the human race keeps track of wisdom. That's what religion's greatest function is: a way to keep track of wisdom. Many atheists cut themselves off from the wisdom present within a religion just because it is from a religion.
I have gone to several Christian Sunday services (like maybe seven?), all Presbyterian. I've always left them a wiser person. I'm not Christian, and the scripture they discuss means very little to me on a spiritual level, but the wisdom is meaningful.
For example, once the chaplain talked about how Thomas doubted Jesus Christ's resurrection until he could feel the zounds (his crucifixion wounds) themselves. Really, this story isn't just about blindly following Jesus. It's about trusting friends. Thomas was a close friend of Jesus's, and he didn't trust his friend when he should have. He didn't realize how meaningful his trust would have been to Jesus when he withheld it. He didn't realize that his skepticism directed at his friend was hurting him.
John 20:29 KJV - Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, "because thou hast seem me, thou hast believed. Blessed are they who have not seen, and yet have believed.
In other words, blessed are those who trust their friends.
After that service, I was a wiser person, for I had learned that my friends value my trust in them, and that the words "I trust you" hold great power. This isn't nearly as obvious as "don't kill people." This kind of wisdom is sitting for us in religious scripture, no matter what the religion actually is. There's even a genre called "wisdom poetry." It's not even universally religious. I'm sure there's secular wisdom poetry. But:
Atheists need a good source of wisdom. Even if they don't believe in the divine, the writings of those who do would do them well to read.
This isn't to say all scripture is good for this. Like I wouldn't recommend most of Leviticus or Joshua to an atheist for learning. I'd probably recommend Proverbs or Ecclesiastes for that. But we should all be dedicating some portion of our week to the wisdom worked out by those who come before us.
on my way to play the binding of isaac on stream but refer to the characters by their hebrew names. "average YITZKHAQ run tbh" "chat's talking about Ya'aqov and Esav, I'm not going to play them, they suck"
also refering to the game as "the Akedah. no like, the game. not the. part of genesis."
I actually don't like cast iron. for people who don't know how to cook in the moment.
what's like the least common type of furry?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
apparently i packed nine pairs of underwear and eleven pairs of socks for a six day trip, but... three shirts?? and three pairs of jeans??
if someone is willing to yell at me that i should be ashamed of myself for thinking that christianity is okay as a baseline, that shows black and white thinking and a lack of nuance and i will not interact with this person until they issue me a high quality apology.