You always say that Paul is often evasive or downplays songs that are about John (or likely to be about John). Can you give some examples? Because he's been very straightforward about Dear Friend and Here Today.
There are songs like Two Of Us that most of us believe are about both John and Linda, but Paul has never acknowledged this (he always states itās a love song for Linda) though he has said he understands why people think otherwise. However, whenever he discusses the song, such as in The Lyrics book where he breaks down almost every line, he completely skips over the lyric: "You and I have memories longer than the road that stretches out ahead." I think it makes sense why he avoids it; that line doesn't fit Linda at the time, given they had only been together for less than a year. Interestingly, while breaking down the line "You and me sending postcards, writing letters..." in that same book, he randomly notes that John was a "great postcard sender, so you would get some great stuff from him." It is interesting that he would casually bring John up if the song truly had nothing to do with him. Why else would that detail be relevant?
With Dear Friend, Paul was actually, at first, much less straightforward. He never openly admitted the song was a direct message to John until the 80s ("It was about John, to John"). In the 70s, he only said, "Itās just about a dear friend, whatever it means to you." Also in the 70s, when asked if there was a song on Wild Life that served as a reply to John, he claimed:
"I don't write anything consciously. Sometimes when I'm pissed off with John over Apple business a line might creep in. I suppose I wrote 'too many people preaching practices / don't let them tell you what you want to be' was at him. If there is something on this album, 'Dear Friend' is the nearest thing to that."
Regarding Too Many People, Paul claimed in a 1984 interview that only two lines in the song were actually about John: "Too many people preaching practices" and "You took your lucky break and broke it in two." He added, "There wasn't anything else on it that was about [John and Yoko]." If you actually read the lyrics, itās glaringly obvious this isn't true, but typical Paul. (In The Lyrics, he finally discusses the track in a more general sense as a reaction to John "firing his missiles" at him through songs). In that same 1984 interview, he insisted those two lines were the only "tiny reference" to John on the entire RAM album. (Sigh).
Then there are the songs he rarely or never publicly acknowledges, almost acting as if they don't even exist. Perfect examples are Oh! Darling and Call Me Back Again. He has never performed "Oh! Darling" at his own concerts (the sole exception being a single performance at the Taylor Hawkins tribute concert, simply because Hawkins loved the track). Paul has only ever made two real commentary about the song back in the 90s, and it strictly focused on technical aspects: how he wanted his voice to sound like heād been singing all week. In Many Years From Now, he merely notes that what he "mainly remembers" is trying to get the vocals right. That was it. It was also the only one of his songs from Abbey Road that he completely excluded from The Lyrics. As for Call Me Back Again, the only time he ever discussed it was in 1975, offering brief technical details. He sang it live from 1975 to 1976, but has never performed it since, nor has he ever acknowledged it again to my knowledge. It was also left out of The Lyrics.
Now Let Me Roll It. The first time an interviewer asked him about his vocals sounding like John's style, Paul was very dismissive, saying, "I still don't think it sounds like him, but that's your opinion." As the years passed, he shifted his narrative, admitting that when he heard the completed track for the first time, he immediately thought it sounded like John, though he claimed it wasn't intentional, before adding that the song was about nothing more than "rolling a joint." Finally, in The Lyrics, the truth changes again: he admits he used the tape echo on his voice intentionally to "acknowledge" the fact that John loved tape echo. For the first time, he also confesses that Let Me Roll It is primarily a love song "about wanting to reach out to someone" but being "hesitant" to express your feelings.
As for Arrow Through Me, he did include it in The Lyrics, but he spends about 90% of the entry talking about everything except the song itself. In the final paragraph, he drops a cryptic commentary stating that the "character" in the song has been wounded, and that it could have been "a great relationship," before adding that there was nobody "more down" than him at the moment of writing it. This is fascinating context, because Wings drummer Steve Holley noted that during the 1979 recording sessions for this song, Paul was deeply depressed and missing John intensely, describing it as "a huge hole in his life."
With Coming Up (which I agree with John on interpreting it as a personal message to him), Paul has never acknowledged the subtext or any deliberate nod to John. He only ever likes to recall how much John loved the track and how it partly motivated him to get back into the studio for Double Fantasy. Tug of War practically screams John (at least to me), yet Paul has always refused to admit it was inspired by him. He says he understands why the public thinks it is, but he oddly uses the defense that the song was written before Johnās death rather than after, using the timeline to imply he wasn't thinking of John at all when he wrote it, lol. Here Today is the first track where he acknowledged the subject matter from the very beginning without any downplaying, though he has claimed on at least two separate occasions that this was the first song he "EVER" wrote about John. (Sigh). Even then, he noted that he "could always deny the song was about him" and "burn the tapes."
Of course, the most recent example is "The Boys of Dungeon Lane." He surprisingly and unprompted stated that the middle verse from Days We Left Behind was about his memories with John, yet he hasn't openly dedicated a single full song on the album to him. Meanwhile, he has openly identified which tracks are about George, Ringo, his parents, Nancy, and even a childhood crush. The songs on that album that sound the most potentially connected to John are precisely the ones he hasn't discussed beyond basic technical details.
PS: By the way, this isn't by any means meant to be a dig at Paul. He has every right to keep to himself and not share the inspiration behind his songs. I just find the contradictions and evasiveness rather funny, because they mostly occur when a song could be about John.