the kbity thing

You... brought her home, right? Called her owners? Did something to get her generally in the direction of the people who certainly must miss their daughter dearly?

no they just took a picture for tumblr and then threw the cat down a sewer drain

yay!

dude the cops are outside we're gonna have to flush the pee

reblog to tell prev she's a good girl

deco*27 - monitoring

So with voting do you cum when a person get bitten into or when a person is swallowed or does it depend on the moment

usually you just mark a ballot with a pen or you select the candidate you want on a screen. sometimes you hole punch the ballot though

walk out of the club like what up i got a small cock

i want 2 kill every single person who complains about the purple categories in nyt connections. why are u playing a word game if u hate wordplay so much

the saddest thing about finally learning algebraic geometry is the realisation that everything there is infected by the axiom of choice. in undergrad it felt confined to fringe counterintuitive results about duplicating spheres but now i find myself using facts like "every non-unit of a ring is contained in some maximal ideal" all the time to prove very general things about schemes :(

If you only work over some nice fields/rings then I guess you can get away with less, but also embrace the axiom of choice and be free

yes yes embrace choice and be free

i know ill probably have to for my own comfort but it feels so gross for an axiom of set theory to assert the existence of sets whose elements cant be described

I know.... *offers a reassuring look and pauses for a moment, considering her words carefully, before proceeding* soon the type theorists will save us all from this.... *looks up wistfully at the sky* we just have to keep faith until then.

✨️ *(Seeing the algebraists hoping for alternatives to the axiom of choice fills you with determination.)

ok actually this might be the thing to convince me. i always thought of choice as something that adds extra unwelcome sets into the mix, but the idea of an axiom that essentially rules out sets where a choice function isnt explicitly definable makes so much sense and weirdly feels like a good compromise. it feels akin to the axiom of foundation asserting the nonexistence of certain sets to prevent russells paradox. maybe i could be converted

hate it when i see a product instead of a direct sum. thats practically analysis

a general concept in maths that i love is when the standard rules of a simple version of a structure fail, but the extent to which they fail is measurable with some other structure. e.g. number rings dont necessarily have unique factorisation, but the extent to which it fails is controlled by the ideal class group, a finite abelian group. in R^n, closed forms of nonzero degree are exact (e.g. u may know that having zero curl makes you conservative) but this isnt true for spaces with stranger topology. the degree to which this fails is measured by the de rham cohomology, closed forms mod exact forms !! great stuff

Tor and Ext functors my beloved

it feels like the 'correct' tool for measure the failure of some complicated structure to be simple is always cohomology and i wonder why that is.

now that i think about it, the ideal class group is also cohomology ! i guess i just love cohomology

schemes r so tricky but i have a lot of affection for them. to me they r like an evil mischievous cat who destroys everything and i love her

could be more sex scenes in topological graph theory if im being real