finally get to post this fun bird, which was commissioned as a gift by haazbrinken o'er on bsky!
DEAR READER

Love Begins
Stranger Things

roma★
Monterey Bay Aquarium
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

pixel skylines

ellievsbear
Three Goblin Art

★
art blog(derogatory)
Cosmic Funnies
d e v o n
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
trying on a metaphor
hello vonnie
One Nice Bug Per Day

tannertan36
Game of Thrones Daily

seen from Japan
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Japan

seen from United States

seen from Russia

seen from Palestinian Territories
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
@kariachi
finally get to post this fun bird, which was commissioned as a gift by haazbrinken o'er on bsky!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
irritating as fuck when people get mad at Black people existing in premodern historical fiction/fantasy media. like first of all, you're racist. and second of all, you are acting as though Black people didn't exist in premodern Europe which is simply false. especially when we're talking about the Mediterranean, like what the fuck do you people think is along the southern half of the Mediterranean Ocean?? everyone's on boats, there are GOING to be interactions with Black people in Northern Africa, and there are GOING to be Black people in Mediterranean Europe. stop being stupid. your imagined homogeneous white European past is not historical reality, get over it you massive losers
The popularity of the "incompetent stupid piece of shit husband and competent wife who loves him anyways" trope in media is a psyop to make women believe its normal to settle for an incompetent stupid piece of shit husband
It frightens and discourages me how pervasive "tribal" stereotypes and imagery are in the fantasy and adventure genres.
It's all over the place in classic literature. Crack open a Jules Verne novel and you're likely to find caricatures of brown people and cultures, even when the characters are sympathetic to the plight of the colonized peoples - incidentally, this is the biggest reason I can't recommend 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea to everyone, despite Captain Nemo being one of my favorite fictional characters of all time.
You can't escape it in modern cinema, either. You'll see white heroes venturing bravely into jungles and tombs to steal from natives who don't know how to use their resources "properly." You'll see them strung up in traps, riddled with sleeping darts, forced to flee and fight their way out. Hell, Pirates of the Caribbean, a remarkably inclusive franchise in many other ways, had an extended sequence of the white heroes escaping from a cannibal civilization in the second film.
And when fantasy RPGs want a humanoid enemy, the "bloodthirsty natives" are the first stock trope they jump to. World of Warcraft is one of the most egregious examples, with the trolls - blatant racist caricatures with faux-voodoo beliefs, cannibalistic diets, Jamaican accents, and a history of being killed in droves by (white) elves and humans - being raided and slaughtered in nearly every expansion.
It doesn't matter how vibrant and distinctive the real-world indigenous, Polynesian, Caribbean, and African cultures are. It doesn't matter how much potential these real civilizations offer for complex and sympathetic characterization. Anything that doesn't make sense to the white western mind is shoved under the same "savage" umbrella. They're different. They're strange. They're scary. They have to be escaped, subjugated, eliminated, ogled at from the safety of a museum.
Modern writers, directors, and developers don't even seem to realize how horrifying it is to present the indigenous inhabitants of a place as "obstacles" for non-native protagonists to overcome. "It's not racist," they say, "because these people aren't really people, you see." And if you dare to point out anything that hurts or offends you as a descendant of the bastardized culture, you're accused of being the real racist: "These aren't humans! They're monsters! Are you saying that these real societies are just like those disgusting monsters?"
No, they're not monsters. But you chose to design them as monsters, just as invaders have done for hundreds of years. Why would you do that? Why can you recognize any other caricature as evil and cruel, but not this?
This is how deep colonialism runs.
You are not immune to romanticizing westward expansion cause you're gay or something just so we're on the same page here. Guys a little too into cowboys are the same as cottagecore girlies to me
Why don't you "settle" your ass down and listen to indigenous people
"But what if this time the escapist fantasy of running away to some Vast Empty Grassland ... was gay 🌈" and why is that grassland empty. Where did the people go

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
“When I speak of Indigenous peoples surviving an apocalypse, I’m not speaking metaphorically. The colonization of the Americas represents the largest genocide in human history. Indigenous populations declined by an estimated 90% in the century following European contact, which was about 1/5 of the world’s population at the time. This over just a one-hundred-year period. Entire civilizations vanished. Languages died. Sacred sites were destroyed. After that culturally genocidal policies were enacted like banning religious ceremonies and children being stolen and forced into boarding schools designed to “kill the Indian, save the child.””
— Randy Woodley
We often talk about how dangerous it is to objectify people and act as if we have natural dominion over them, and then Robin Wall Kimmerer talks about how the way we've objectified nature connects to us looking at the world as resources to extract, which is the ideology behind capitalism and colonialism, and it's like, ooooh, the problem with objectification goes even deeper than we thought.
In a worldview like the one Kimmerer espouses, where you see plants, animals, and natural features as people, you think of yourself as being in community with them, where you all participate in a gift economy. And this makes you realize that 1. you really shouldn't hurt them unnecessarily, and 2. you should give back. This mindset drives us to integrate ourselves with the ecosystem, rather than pillage it relentlessly.
👀👀👀
[Image Transcripts]
"People in the imperial core don't realize how much of the products in our lives are directly there because of colonialism. so they recreate that and then you have the weird implications of fantasy colonialism. You can say 'why does it matter for my fantasy Europe to have coffee' because you don't know why your real life Europe has coffee. And that these facts do actually have a death toll to them."
"The coffee example in particular its very interesting. Bc it'd be quite easy to justify having coffee in a fantasy story that's set in a tropical region. Or in a kingdom that trades with a tropical region or whatever. But then you realize that never happens because. sff writers NEVER set their stories in tropical weathers. I can count on one hand the fantasy worlds where there are prosperous kingdoms in tropical regions. And that opens the can of worms of: why is the default fantasy setting a temperate forest of pine and oak trees. Or a snowy mountainous landscape. While deserts and jungles are always dangerous exotic foreign lands."
[End Transcripts]
“Europe is very old and America is very big.”
Colonial America, maybe.
The way Europeans talk about North America when they say it reveals everything about the way they think.
To them, history here didn’t start until they arrived. Not until the so called real people with real culture and real architecture and real timelines stepped off a boat.
Everything before that gets treated like fog, like background noise, like a blank landscape waiting to be drawn on.
Like the Europeans arrived here and just found a land untouched by human hands ready for them to Manifest (European) Destiny in, instead of, like, a continent full of nations older than most European countries, with civilizations, trade routes, astronomy, agriculture, laws, stories, cities, innovations, relationships to the land that go further back than many of the languages used to belittle them.
When Europeans say “America is big,” they don’t even mean the actual land full of over 500 nations of distinct peoples.
They mean the unmarked page they imagine they wrote on. When they say “Europe is old,” they mean “ours is the old that matters.” The implication is always that Indigenous history doesn’t count as history at all, that Indigenous people were somehow outside the timeline until colonialism kicked the clock into motion.
I’m tired of watching it walk by unchallenged and seeing it drift by unchallenged.
North America wasn’t waiting to be discovered.
It wasn’t empty wilderness.
It wasn’t without time or culture or memory.
It was already ancient when the Europeans arrived.
Treating Indigenous people like footnotes or shadows just makes it embarrassingly obvious that a lot of Europeans still don’t see them as real people with real history, real innovation, and real presence.
This continent has been old for longer than Europe has had its current borders. The only thing that’s new here is the colonial amnesia.
Some ways to decolonize fantasy I can think of, with particular regard to fantasy cultures based on European mythology and folklore:
Instead of referring to them collectively as races, refer to them as people.
Try and find out how they (or the figures that inspired them) were conceptualized in pre-Christian times. It won't always be unproblematic, but it's always a good start.
A lot of these figures were influenced by humans' experiences and perceptions the nonhuman world. Figuring out the connections the nonhuman world behaves can be useful in figuring out why they act the way they do in stories, and what kind of abilities and behaviors you might give them.
Another thing about making the connection between mythological/folkloric creatures and the natural world, is that you'll start seeing places where it's reasonable for variation and change to exist. Nature is always variable and in flux, so it's easy to resist essentialism if you pay attention to it.
Never forget material and emotional incentives as a possible explanation for why they behave Like That.
It's not inherently racist to make nonhuman people that do things like, say, eat humans sometimes, because a lot of old stories were informed by the fact that certain aspects of nature were very dangerous to us. But it is racist to code them as "primitive" POC, or any culture that has been slandered with false allegations of cannibalism (for example, Jews). It's also anti-environment to act as if other-than-human people are all inherently evil or that something is fundamentally wrong with them because they do things we don't like sometimes.
Consider them from an ecological perspective - what niches do they fill, and what benefits from their presence? Even if they cause problems for humans sometimes, they should still have an ecological role. (Even if they aren't currently fulfilling it because something went wrong somewhere.)
At some point you might be tempted to go, "Oh, they keep humans in check because humans are inherently destructive to the environment." This is your colonialist/extractivist upbringing talking. There are many cultures where humans see the world as a system of relationships where everything is in reciprocity with each other, and if you take something you are obligated to give back. (I suggest reading Robin Wall Kimmerer's books for a Potawatomi take on this.)
Once again, material and emotional incentives can go a long way to explain behaviors.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Once you learn to recognize the rhetoric of eugenics and racialization for what it is, you look at modern fantasy and sci-fi and realize Oh That Accursed Shit Is Everywhere.
I’m curious: is the notion that certain species/races/ancestries are “like that” (Elves love nature, dwarves dig, dragons hoard) an offshoot of the eugenics derived (or adjacent) notion of “Biological Essentialism”?
It depends. Some of relates to their roles/niches as nature spirits. Like, mermaids eating people derives from folklore where local water spirits were believed to eat people because people really do get sucked down into ponds and rivers and disappear.
But if somebody's going "all mermaids forever have to eat human flesh because they're biologically required/compelled to do so," then yeah, that's bioessentialist.
I wonder about your opinion on the "Cursed by the Gods" trope.
In D&D, Gruumsh and Lloth had cursed their progeny, respectively the orcs and drows, into villainy and evil.
It is not strictly bio-essentialism in that it's not bio but magic, moreover magic from an external source, but it does *feel* like it as it fill the niche of "that race of people are the bad guys.".
In the context of D&D? It's uhh... how put. Almost certainly influenced by this kind of bullshit:
For nearly 500 years, priests and imams justified slavery on the basis of a misunderstood passage of the Bible.
It is interesting, although there are some differences in the origin of the curse.
Thinking about it through the religious lense made me think of several points.
1. The Curse presuppose a natural state that is not evil.
2. The "not cursed" are seen as the good guys in general, or at least better off.
3. The Gods are living breathing entities, but also mostly metaphores for something else. Due to their active role, they are not merely expression of nature or human behavior, but rulers and monarchs.
Therefore it seems to me that the "God cursing their people" is a metaphore for "Savages are hindered by their barbaric civilisation".
It is more a colonial message, that the orcs and drows are denatured by their culture and must be returned to their "natural" state, under the right Gods, and join the other species even if they resist.
The orcish and drow culture have nothing to contribute, nothing of value, and the destruction of their Gods, aka their civilization and culture, would be a great victory for the world and the people themselves.
#I wonder what a decolonized vision of DnD wouod look like
I ask that question about a lot of fantasy! In my opinion, a good way to approach this is to try and understand the animistic and relationship-based worldviews pre-Christian Europeans had. Once you get your head around it, stuff just starts clicking, like that some elves would live underground because they're the nature spirits of that realm. (And there's just there's no good reason to invoke a curse at all.)
people are so fucking weird about uncontacted tribes/peoples oh my goddddd you are not making it out of the colonialist mindset
fun fact uncontacted peoples are not ignorant they are fully aware of the "outside world" and are CHOOSING not to have contact because they (rightly) feel it would add no value to their lives and place them in an exploited position. it's voluntary. they are isolated on purpose.
sentinelese people aren't like some ignorant noble savages, or actual savages who are all about warfare and killing (wildly racist take i see very often), they are literally regular ass fucking people who have seen the exploitation of their neighbors (other andamanese people) AND the massive disease outbreaks caused by contact, and decided they want no part in that. they are literally regular people choosing to survive. that's it.
glad that this is getting traction, but if you're saying things like "yeah, and they are right! modern society is a curse! they are living The Right Way and are more enlightened have better lives than us!" you are also the people i'm talking about. sorry. they are regular people living regular lives. please internalize this fact and stop exoticizing.
the thing with transphobia directed at nonbinary people is that like. it is ultimately rooted in misogyny. people will see nonbinary as "woman lite" or "embarrassing man who needs to be shamed back into masculinity" and any interaction where they make fun of nonbinary people is basically tinted by that. insults leveraged at nonbinary people are often about how incompetent they are, not knowing their place, being too sensitive/tender, being delusional about the way the world works. which are misogynistic points. but anyway.
just read your reply to hellokittysbow. i'm sorry those awful things happened to you, but the emphasis on her being murdered bcos she was ace (& therefore not giving consent) feels like you're devaluing consent given generally. it shouldn't matter what reason someone gives for not consenting- ace or allo. this was an act of an entitled misogynist who wouldn't take no for an answer regardless of the reason & is a product of the oppression of women rather than aces
It only feels like I’m devaluing consent generally because you folks refuse to understand how intersectionality impacts people with multiple oppressions. Mainly because you genuinely think asexual folks are not oppressed, despite us constantly, constantly producing evidence to show we are.
In a big Australian study, a university found that asexual people of all sexualities and genders are sexually harassed and assaulted more than their allo counterparts. So when I make a statement like “she was in danger already as a woman, and even more so as an asexual woman”, it’s a factually true statement.
I’m not saying saying ‘no’ is not dangerous for a woman, but empirically it’s even more dangeorus for an asexual woman. Making and statement like this does not devalue women’s consent, it makes a true, accurate statement about how in-danger asexual folks are at the hands of allo folks generally as well as acknowledging how much women are in danger at the hands of men generally. There are two oppressions here. Noting the existence and impact of one does not devalue the other. They both matter.
allocentrism bad

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
allonormativity bad
When Amal surprised me by telling me she named her newborn after me, I felt like part of my heart had gone to Gaza and remained there ever since.
This part of my heart is now breaking. Amal, who's been on a poor diet because she can't afford better food, is unable to breastfeed baby Mina any longer, and is unable to afford enough formula to compensate, and now both mother and baby are weak and malnourished.
Amal is suffocating from the stress of having to provide for her daughters. Her husband Motasem is doing everything he can (recently, he was almost caught in a bombing while trying to get food) but they're both overwhelmed. I wish there was anything I can do for them.
I'm begging you to donate if you can and share if you can't. I want, more than anything in this world, for these kids to grow up healthy and for their parents to be able to rest.
Fundraiser Vetting info
Amal Ashour's family is #175 on our list!
Hello friends, I'm Sahar! Lia & I are friends of the Ashours & Shehabs, and we'll be helping them run this campaign. Both families have had
Vetted! #175 on the verified fundraiser list vetted by el-shab-hussein and nabulsi
vetted by @bilal-sala7 line #46