Thereâs a reason many people, if given the choice, travel to Rome and not their local strip mall. Oh sure, part of it is the allure of a far-flung locale with its exotic language, customs and food (and letâs be real, the food is of utmost importance). But if youâre like me, much of the appeal of traveling to a city like Madrid or London is the chance to see some authentically antediluvian structures, like the Colosseum or Stonehenge. I donât want to drive to my local Safeway, which is located in a complex fashioned to look like it belonged in Greece 2,000 years ago (you know the kind Iâm talking about, with their maize-colored walls and their terra cotta roofs). I want to actually go where the buildings were erected two millennia ago and, to quote Julia Roberts in Eat Pray Love, marvel at these amazing structures of old.
Isnât it funny how this authenticity we crave comes at a cost to the buildings themselves? The Tower of London, for example, has been besieged, partially destroyed by fire and bombed. Yet this English landmark (with the help of some reconstruction, remodeling and refurbishing) still stands, as breathtaking and imposing a structure as when it was first built in the 11th century. [Insert your favorite old monument here and the same could probably be said of it.]
The point Iâm trying to make is that these structures, to use a trite phrase, have stood the test of time. Part of my awe when I visit them stems from the mere fact that they still exist. The Black Death, the Tudor era, the overthrow and return of the monarchy, World Wars I and II all occurred, and the Tower of London pre-dates and has survived them all.
Could the same be true of the flimsy structures we currently build? Is there any reader who doubts that the building in which their local Pizza My Heart is housed would crumble at the mere whisper of an earthquake? If placed next to an aged, weathered building, the strip mall building might look similar (or even better). But we all know which one would probably survive a natural disaster.
I think the same could be said of you and me. Confession: I have this terrible tendency to focus on my outward appearance. Not so much physically (though I love clothes-shopping, Iâll admit it), but what I mean is sometimes I worry too much about how Iâm perceived rather than how I actually am. Given the choice, Iâd rather be thought of as kind rather than have selflessness and humility as integral parts of my character. The reasons are obvious: the former is easy to fake for a fleeting moment and the latter takes years and years of work, practice and self-denial.
Put me next to someone whoâs been walking in the faith for 50 years, and our outward appearance may look the same. We may both smile to strangers we pass on the sidewalk, we may both murmur a greeting to the person at the storeâs checkout counter. But if one of lifeâs storms comes, the 50-year veteranâs kindness and good humor will probably remain. Mine will likely be gone faster than you can say âsayonara.â
The eponymous author of the Book of James reminds us to âcount it all joy when we fall into various trials, knowing that the testing of your faith produces patience.â Weâll each have our own personal Black Death or World War I in our lives. These events will shape and refine us. My prayer for myself (and for you, dear reader, should you find yourself in a position similar to me) is that I worry less about how I appear and instead allow these trials to mold my true character. And at the end of our lives, part of our testimony will simply be that weâre still standing. We didnât succumb to the proverbial sieges, fires and bombs. And our characters wonât be fake terra cotta-roofed but more akin to ancient monuments: strong, weathered, gorgeous and true.
















