himbo coded

my polteageist from my shield playthrough!!

He's right and he's also living his dream... Truly the man is an icon. 👏🏽🥺

Update: Elmo retweeted!!! And he added something too

but i’ve been on twitter recently and there is a fucking DELUGE of people promoting the idea of “bisexual lesbians” (never bisexual gay men but like… that’s a tangential dialogue for another time). this idea that you can be bisexual and a lesbian at the same time is a direct product of the split attraction model.

this is the EXACT shit i was talking about when I said rhetoric from ace community is not compatible, at all, with the LGBT community.

sexualizing the -sexual suffix so “bisexual” SOLELY means “SEXUALLY attracted to the opposite gender” so someone can be bisexual and “homoromantic” is ACTIVELY harmful to lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. it sexualizes bisexuals without consent and COMPLETELY redefines what gayness is so it can include attraction to the “opposite” gender.

and this is just one example of how ace inclusion–not just the inclusion of cisgender, straight aces but also the prioritization of ace ideals–hurts the LGBT community. the rhetoric that you can have sex with people you aren’t attracted to to “make it work” romantically is conversion therapy rhetoric. Ace inclusion makes it seem like the LGBT community is about our relationships to sex when that just isn’t true. Ace inclusion means “desexualizing” LGBT spaces so as not to upset asexuals. All this shit AND MORE is happening in real time and I’ve watched it get worse and worse, hand in hand with the commercialization of LGBT pride and the liberalization of LGBT activism.

ace rhetoric is eroding LGBT identities. the idea of the “bisexual lesbian” and other mogai microidentities where you parse every single aspect of your identity into a different label is actively harming vulnerable LGBT people.

and, no, this isn’t me saying “even LGBT aces have to go,” but this is me saying that putting ace identities at the forefront of ANY LGBT discussions leaves a lot of space for harm for LGBT people. and that any fucking ace rhetoric besides “it’s okay to not feel sexual attraction or want to have sex” comes at the expense of LGBT identity.

genuinely, the concept of “bisexual lesbian” is a direct product of the ace community and it has caused lesbians and bisexual women irreparable harm. and aces should be ashamed of this because this is what they have been defending for years.

this is the EXACT shit we said would come out of the split attraction model and now we have TEENAGERS telling strangers and adults “i’m sexually attracted to [x genders] but only romantically into [y]” and y’all think this is okay. even if it weren’t fucking INSANE to say lesbians can be attracted to men or that bisexuals can be half gay or half straight, you’d STILL be out of fuckng line having KIDS center identities around SOLELY sexual attraction.

people of every sexual orientation except asexuality have (and have always had) individual variation in the strength of their sexual and romantic feelings, in the scope of their sexual and romantic feelings, in the frequency and duration of their sexual and romantic feelings. those kinds of variations do not themselves constitute unique identity categories, but are instead part of the diversity of each sexual orientation. you can be a lesbian without being attracted to every woman you meet. you can be a straight woman that doesn’t want a romantic relationship with any men. neither condition would make you asexual - they’d make you you, and still a lesbian or straight person.

to be asexual, you must satisfy the condition that defines asexuality, and you must satisfy it at all times, for the rest of your life: a comprehensive absence of attraction. if you do not have a comprehensive absence of attraction, there is space for you in the “allosexual” constellation of sexual orientations. only people without any attraction (at all! at all. at. all.) don’t fit in the other categories. it is we rare little freaks that have no basis for shared identity with any other orientation that asexuality describes.