What I liked reading this year
I have a lot of thoughts about the books I didnât like reading this year. But I'm not bothered committing them here.
There's an opening scene in an episode of Fraiser with he and Niles come home from a restaurant and Daphne, I think, asks them how the meal was and one of the men says perfect except for one thing. She then says something along the lines of that being exactly the way they like it, and sure enough, they extrapolate. I think I watched that scene anyway.Â
However, saying some books I read were perfect except for one thing is very generous. Too generous. So, instead, here are a few things Iâve read the past eleven or so months I really enjoyed or thought about long after.Â
The Rules Do Not Apply by Ariel LevyÂ
I was talking about miscarriage with a friend earlier this year as I was writing a feature about pregnancy loss. It was eye-opening and the phone interviews I conducted were⌠I canât say fierce emotional tennis as it implies I experienced a fraction of the trauma the women who kindly gave up their time and privacy did. It was tough, and if you are an editor who commissions article with an intent to horrify and shock, try and facilitate some talk therapy for your writers.Â
I was telling my friend some of the stories I was putting in the article and we talked about how men arenât really clued into a lot of what women are expected to go through. I said, flippantly, âThe only miscarriage guys we know know about is Ariel Levyâs.âÂ
It wasnât a nice thing to say, because Ariel Levy is a human being, and the article she wrote a few years ago for The New Yorker about losing a wanted pregnancy on assignment in Mongolia is earth-shattering. But I was trying to get at my assumption that certain men need to have issues communicated to them by publications of grand record before they give a shit. âWe need a New Yorker abortion or New Yorker pay gap,â we joked.Â
This memoir was a pick for my book club, and I gulped it in days. Which isnât a usual habit of Book Club Jean. The book expands on the New Yorker essay, which comes late enough in the text, and looks at Levyâs keening marriage, biological clocks, and forgiveness. From the opening chapters, where Levy recounts how your twenties and thirties becomes a biological battleground, I was there. Iâm witnessing a lot of change and shifting among the women I know. Scrolling Instagram after a bank holiday gives me a heart murmur. I imagine it only gets worse.Â
This, from the preface, got the highlight: âUntil recently, I lived in a world where lost things could always be replaced. But it has been made overwhelmingly clear to me now that anything you think is yours by right can vanish, and what you can do about that is nothing at all.âÂ
You can make plans, but the idea of perfect alignment is the shakiest ground.
Dirty Duet by Laurelin PaigeÂ
Paigeâs romance novels could be described as taboo, so if you need smelling salts after a Starz show maybe donât. I think her writing is amazing and her female characterisation- flawed, fucked up, self-aware, grown-up â is in a league of its own.Â
The plot starts out love triangle-ish, thereâs a lot of focus on the heroineâs career â my catnip, and itâs super dramatic. Trigger warning, this one deals with rape fantasy as a way to overcome trauma. Sabrina Lind is a college freshman with a thing for a fellow student, a very wealthy good-time guy. His older best friend is her TA. Something criminal happens. Then something unethical. Years later they all end up working together in a massive advertising firm and itâs very clear no one has gone to therapy.Â
The first book is called Dirty Filthy Rich Men, which might give you a bit of a pause if youâre new to this sort of genre. But weâre living in a country where there is an athleteâs memoir on bookshelves around the country called Gooch. I think that should be a national conversation.Â
Oh My God, What a Complete Aisling! by Emer McLysaght, Sarah BreenÂ
I cried in a hotel room and on an Aircoach reading this book. Itâs so kind, so lovely.Â
Scribble Scribble by Nora EphronÂ
Being a fan of Nora Ephron isnât a character trait, although the way some people go on youâd swear Iâd have to give you first dibs on bone marrow if weâve read the same books. Late last year I got around to watching the HBO documentary about her, Everything is Copy, and went back to her writing. This time I read beyond the personal essays and looked at her articles on media and the machine â the Scribble Scribble part. It sort of changed my life, philosophy, perception. She really didnât give a shit. We talk a lot about she used pain and made great films, but I enjoyed exploring the critiquing claws. To be honest, letting all her writings permeate, Iâd say if we met sheâd have hated me.
I donât think we have her sort in Ireland. We have people who report on media, social media users make healthy and necessary critiques of the Irish Times opinion article choices. But we donât have Nora. Which is a pity, as during freefalls there are some great stories. But then, you could argue, are we too small a country for such behaviour? Can you get away with true honesty?
Here is some of her scathing typing on People magazine back in the day:
"I have nothing against short articles, and no desire to read more than 1500 words or so on most of the personalities People profiles. In fact, in the case of a number of those personalitiesâand here the name of Telly Savalas springs instantly to mindâa caption would suffice. I have no quarrel with the writing in the magazine, which is slick and perfectly competent. I wouldnât mind if People were just a picture magazine, if I could at least see the pictures; there is an indefinable something in its art direction that makes the magazine look remarkably like the centerfold of the Daily News. And I wouldnât even mind if it were a fan magazine for grownupsâif it delivered the goods. But the real problem is that when I finish reading People, I always feel that I have just spent four days in Los Angeles. Womenâs Wear Daily at least makes me feel dirty; People makes me feel that I havenât read or learned or seen anything at all. I donât think this is what Richard Stolley means when he says he wants to leave his readers wanting more: I tend to be left feeling that I havenât gotten anything in the first place. And even this feeling is hard to pinpoint; I am looking at a recent issue of People, with Hugh Hefner on the cover, and I canât really say I didnât learn anything in it: On page 6 it says that Hefner told his unauthorized biographer that he once had a homosexual experience. I didnât actually know that before reading People, but somehow it doesnât surprise me.â
Those thoughts, they echo what I hear people say about certain internet personalites at the moment. You could tailor the above about a lot of them, just minor edits, and it could nail so much. Some might find it skin crawling that I equate social media accounts with magazine, but I would do that IRL. They have advertising, they are publishing, they have an audience. Some boxes are ticked.
Nothing they say surprises me.Â
Youâll find Scribble Scribble in an anthology of Ephronâs writing, Crazy Salad & Scribble Scribble.