Reading is political and it always has been. Here are some of the classic books on the banned list that you should definitely check out.
Cosmic Funnies

blake kathryn
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

tannertan36
Cosimo Galluzzi

Origami Around
todays bird

pixel skylines
The Stonewall Inn
Noah Kahan

Product Placement

if i look back, i am lost
NASA
Claire Keane
Interview Vampire Daily
The Bowery Presents

Color Me Curious
Mike Driver
Monterey Bay Aquarium

seen from Singapore
seen from Germany
seen from Brazil

seen from Türkiye
seen from Burkina Faso

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Austria
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
@itsactuallyjustice
Reading is political and it always has been. Here are some of the classic books on the banned list that you should definitely check out.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Recently I finished my 21st book of the year, first book of August, that being Jurassic Park by Michael Crichton and I have to say, this has to be among the most entertaining novels I've read in 2026 and it will certainly remain a memorable book in my memory. Spoilers ahead!
I should mention, I have not watched the film, but after finishing this I might and then maybe I'll compare the two and make another post, but for now, my knowledge of Jurassic Park is only this book.
While I could go on like most people who've read the book about Crichton's ability to portray small bits of terrifying horror, how he eases the reader into the fragility of Isla Nublar, how he builds up to the crucial moment where everything goes wrong and more. I could make my amateur observations and criticisms, but I want to highlight two different things instead. Two characters who are polar opposites.
Ian Malcolm and John Hammond.
Both left a deep impression on me for various reasons, outside of both being stellar creations by Crichton.
Ian Malcolm, the mathematician who spent over half the book dying in a hotel bed has to be one of the standout characters of the book, but among his many philosophical statements, discussions of chaos theory, and of course, him rightfully dogging on Hammond at every point he can, the thing that remained with me till the end of the book was this one line,
"Discovery is always rape of the natural world. Always."
I thought about this line, more and more as I continued reading, even between my breaks of reading, this quote remained in my mind as something essential, something important, something relevant especially now as deregulation and AI "advancement" continues, where scientists and so-called scientists try to break boundaries that they do not understand in the slightest, boundaries where the consequence is either ignored or misunderstood. Going back in history the same could be said when the Portuguese started to expand their influence into Africa in 1415, and introduced an age of slavery like nothing seen before, when Columbus arrived to the shores of San Salvador and began a career of butchery, when Europeans finally found ways to infiltrate Asia, when America began its Cold War and so much more. This quote also perfectly ties back to another thing that Ian Malcolm said, when he emphasized the importance of discipline when given great power and what happens when someone (like Hammond) possesses great power, but no discipline.
Speaking of John Hammond....
The cheery CEO of InGen, the whimsical owner of Jurassic Park, the delusional old fool who could never admit his own faults at any point. It's difficult to describe how infuriating Hammond made me throughout the book, and that speaks to Crichton's capabilities in creating such an important idiot. Up until the last two chapters revolving directly around Hammond I had mostly believed that he was just a happy idiot with too much money, but the cracks in his facade became obvious whenever he put on his hand on someone's shoulder, as if reminding the individual who he spoke with, who was really in charge (which makes the end of the last chapter rather funny). Hammond was greedy, like most CEOs, additionally, he was also cheap like most CEOs and that cheapness and willing ignorance regarding the security of the island and the dinosaurs caused the deaths of many people. In his second to last chapter is when we really see his mask vanish, Hammond blaming Wu and Arnold for being inadequate and not up to the task as simple mishires while barely acknowledging their gruesome deaths spoke so much of his own convinced delusion that the park could still be saved while still having hope for more parks in the future. His utter disregard to any concern raised by Muldoon about security played so well that you could feel Muldoon's frustration while being frustrated yourself. The obsession of authenticity concerning his "product" while not even bothering to understand it can be compared to Heinrich Schliemann's destructive attempt at archeology. The final straw of Hammond is again in his second to last chapter when he ends up injuring himself while running away and soon after hears his grandchildren messing around in the Control Room, cursing them while he laid there in pain, admitting to the reader that the only reason he brought them was to prove to Gennaro that the park was completely safe. Hammond's death at the hands of the compys is ironic in a way I can't exactly describe, something about the man who desired authenticity to its truest degree dying at the hands of his made manifest dreams.
I can say for certain that I will read the sequel, The Lost World and will make a post about it probably, but before I get to that distant date I do want to recommend that you read Jurassic Park, a genuinely fantastic and unique book that should be read and held in the same regard, if not higher than its adaptation. A certified 5/5 novel for me.
A beginning is easy. A middle is easy. But god forbid my mind be capable of coming up with an ending.
If you think what you're writing is above your skill level, do it anyway. You might surprise yourself in what you are able to do, and even if you don't, the experience is worth it. Write, and write, and write some more. You can always re-write it when your skill increases. But your skill level will never increase if you don't challenge yourself and above all else-- write.
"How's the writing going?"
The document is open. That's the most I can confirm.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I genuinely can't get over Booktok users confessing that they skip all of the prose and only read dialogue, and then in the same breath they tell authors to stop using big words because it's ableist? Actually I think you don't know words because you do not read but yeah sure
I’m so sorry but in the nicest way possible do yall actually read books or just read words??? Cause I’ve been seeing that trend of people not understanding how “snarled” and “eyes darkened” and “eyes softened” etc. was used in a book and like…
Genuinely, do yall just not have imagination?? Or not understand figurative language??? Also eyes do literally darken and soften have you not lived a life??? How do you read with no imagination? Is this how you get through so many books in one month - you simply don’t take the time the understand the words as they are read?
I tend to not DNF books out of principle, regardless of how little I enjoy them. If a book I'm reading doesn't live up to the expectations I've set or the expectations that the book itself has set, I still continue on.
While obviously there are exceptions, I feel like dropping a book is disrespectful, not only to the author in question, but to yourself. Reading a bad book, or a book that you just simply didn't like is another great avenue at self discovery in my opinion. And to go one step, if you have aspirations as a writer, reading bad books is a good thing, you get to learn from them, avoid making the same mistakes, or wanting to do a twist on something you read within them. It's always more beneficial to read.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
FRIENDLY REMINDER: STANDARD BOOK CHAPTERS ARE ANYWHERE BETWEEN 2000 AND 5000 WORDS, WITH 5000 BEING CONSIDERED A LONG CHAPTER.
CHANGE YOUR WORD DOCUMENT FORMAT TO A IMITATE A STANDARD BOOK TO SEE HOW MANY PAGES YOU HAVE ALREADY, YOU PROBABLY HAVE ALOT MORE THAN YOU THINK AND WE'RE ALL SO PROUD OF YOU <3
listening to CDs in the kitchen i always brace myself for the ad between songs but then it just keeps rolling. skipping around how i like without interruption feels heavenly. we're in such a commercial angst prison that books and CDs are luxury now 😭
protect, pass on, thrift, gift, and store physical media, it's worth it
as an author who did lots of fantasy genre research don't get me started on how much time goes into nature/plants (!) animals food and architecture
being a writer is fun
Writing tips: He said, she said...
Readers don't tend to notice 'said', while it's there in the sentence, it doesn't give the sentence any life. It gets the job done, mostly...
Here are some options to try!
whispered / muttered / mumbled → soft or secretive
shouted / yelled / barked → anger, urgency
growled / hissed → danger, teasing, frustration
murmured / breathed → intimacy, vulnerability
snapped / barked / snapped back → irritation, defensiveness
laughed / chuckled / giggled → laughing, fun, playful or flirty
asked / questioned / queried / inquired → curiosity, questioning
demanded / insisted → authority or control
sighed / groaned → fatigue, exasperation, longing
When you're looking to replace said, think about why. You'll generally want to do this when you need the following:
when the tone of the line needs more context.
when you want to show emotion instead of telling it.
when your character’s body language, action, or expression can do the talking instead.
Take a look at the scene you're writing, is the character saying their line? Or are they yelling it? Screaming it? Are they enraged, or perhaps is their voice a broken whisper from grief?
That being said, you shouldn't always avoid using 'said.' It's easy to read in long sentences, and it keeps the focus on the dialogue rather than the rest of the scenes. That may be beneficial and a key component to parts of your story.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Among the soon to be 20 (out of hopefully 52) books I've read this year I'd like to highlight Speculative Whiteness by Jordan S. Carroll for adding needed context to understanding bigots in science fiction spaces.
Admittedly, I mostly read fiction, I've read a dozen non-fiction books at best, mostly for university studies and few for personal interest, and that's something I need to improve upon, something a lot of other people should improve upon as well. While delving into fictional worlds can be both liberating and fulfilling, it's vital we do not remain blind to the truth of the world, every effort to ban books, trample rights will eventually end in a collective punishment for those not part of the upper echelons of a corrupt society.
This book feels more relevant than ever as the wave of young white men falling for far right propaganda keeps growing, further heightened by a ruler of a dying empire in America, whose murderous leader still keeps building up his army of non-thinkers as he nears the day to put on a crown and turn a false democracy into an autocracy.
But this shouldn't surprise anyone once you take a look at the state of education in America. In the simplest terms, it is a joke that puts anti-intellectualism on a pedestal and critical thinking in a ditch, and many people just accept it. They accept it because it is easy. It's easy to not be curious, it's easy to listen to what Big Brother says is truth, it's easy to look the other way, it's easy to lack a backbone, it's easy to hide behind a bastardization of faith, it's easy to hate. While many are ideological slaves, an equal if not greater amount of people are willing participants in spreading hate. Not just because it's easy, but because they completely believe it, and like it.
It's nothing new to any ethnic or sexual minority that the domain of science fiction has mostly been dominated by straight white men from its inception, but as the world continues on, we see books, shows, movies, video games, comics and other mediums gain fans from all sorts of backgrounds and in a twist of irony, those "fans" who feel threatened by new arrivals liken us to colonizers, yet demonize us as savages who cannot understand the complexities of their fictional worlds while they cower at the idea of a united one. These are people who lack empathy for those who work, boasting about themselves and their corporate overlords as AI slave masters as if they reap the benefits of a dying world. These are people who lack empathy for those who suffer, pridefully dictating how to live while listening to men who have fundamentally achieved nothing.
These are the same people who don't dare to think, to imagine, to create.
These are the people you must defy at every step.