akkey

creds :

based on @/sansllura's tweet

Kagura: Why?

Sougo: Just curious

Kagura: I guess?

Chapters: 1/1 Fandom: Gintama Rating: Mature Warnings: Creator Chose Not To Use Archive Warnings Relationships: Kagura/Okita Sougo Characters: Kagura (Gintama), Okita Sougo, Sakata Gintoki Additional Tags: okikaguweek2021, okkgweek2021, Tattoos, Drunken Shenanigans Summary:

some okikagu in low quality

If they really get married, won’t their marriage has significant political influence to the society and country? There are a few fics that touch upon this, however it is mainly about society’s judgement against Kagura being Amanto and whatnot. But doesn’t it would affect Sougo too as he can be considered as a traitor to the humankind for his reunion with Kagura? Especially since he is a police officer.

And the people around them could also be influenced by their marriage, specifically their kids. Imagine you having godfathers consisted of the Commander of the Shinsengumi and Shiroyasha. Your godmother is the princess of the country and your maternal family consists of the psychotic Harusame leader as your uncle and the legendary Umibouzu as your grandfather. It almost like a bizarre political marriage between a family of justice having a peace treaty with the worst criminal family 🤣.

And being the first known human-Yato hybrid makes all the slave drivers and those human-Amanto traffickers went crazy for them. Not yet counting the enemies of their families (let’s be real, the kids know their parents have been dislike by many people, particularly their sadistic father) Souichirou might have been used to intercept the assassins creeping around their house far too often. Which Sougo makes it a good practice for his son’s future career.

“Captain Souichirou, how do you know the assassins are lurking around the base?”

“My dad used to make me play hide-and-seek with them often when I was a kid. They hide, I seek and he ‘punish’ them.” 😂😂😂

🎐okita sougo x kagura

aaaa yes my otp!! 😭😭

🎐gintoki x tsukuyo

my otp too!! tsukki best girl omg ❤️

🎐kondou x otae

goris 🐵❤️

🎐hijikata x mitsuba

oh what it could have been :((

🎐zenzou x sacchan

🎐shinpachi x pandemonium-san

I tried.

Again.

Misinformation is also a virus and our country is just as infected with it as it is with COVID-19.

Bunk thinks he is perfectly innocent publicly posting his bad information. That he is not harming anyone. But he has influence over his loved ones and his friends and maybe even strangers that see his nonsense.

He is a potential superspreader of misinformation.

And that is dangerous.

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-vaccine/art-20484859

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2035389

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6950e2.htm

A while back I wrote a post titled “In Praise of Consistency,” which argues that a powerful way to examine one’s beliefs is to check their internal consistency. An example that’s currently on my mind is the right of private companies to turn away unvaccinated customers. On the right there are a lot of people who seem to think that shouldn’t be allowed, but at the same time belief that a baker should be able to refuse making a wedding cake for a gay couple.

This strikes me as highly inconsistent, which should set off alarm bells that something is wrong. If you support a business turning away customers based on taking moral offense, then it would appear that turning away customers for the potential of infecting your staff and other customers should be well within the rights of the business (it would in fact be quite easy to simply frame this as a moral offense also).

But the inconsistency exists to a degree on the left also. There, a lot of people think nothing of compelling a baker to serve a gay couple, but would loudly object to a governor forcing businesses to allow unvaccinated customers. A proposed resolution for this inconsistency, however, is maybe more readily possible: the vaccination case revolves around the potential of physical harm not just to the proprietor, but also to other customers.