Pinned post! My name is Rose/Rosemuse/Hemisphaerica! It's mostly TTRPGS here.
My fan art tag can be found HERE
I also have a Bluesky HERE (if you'd rather follow only for fan art without having to deal with all of my reblogs of fandom meta.)
ojovivo
$LAYYYTER
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

oozey mess
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

tannertan36
Cosimo Galluzzi
DEAR READER

â

@theartofmadeline
occasionally subtle
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Misplaced Lens Cap
Three Goblin Art
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

titsay
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Romania

seen from Brazil

seen from Japan

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom
seen from India
seen from United States
@hemisphaericas
Pinned post! My name is Rose/Rosemuse/Hemisphaerica! It's mostly TTRPGS here.
My fan art tag can be found HERE
I also have a Bluesky HERE (if you'd rather follow only for fan art without having to deal with all of my reblogs of fandom meta.)

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Azune: "You're very wise, Occtis."
Occtis, instantly: "Nope!"
(You could try "You are wiser than Julien," which he might accept, but it also isn't much of a compliment at that point.)
Shadow
Feeling sappy about Hal and Thaishaâs children again. I made a previous post before discovering Alogar wasnât at the Make-an-Angel workshop talking about how his heroic stand against the undead was probably inspired by his heroic mama. And now we have Shadia, just like her papa, using her craft to make her own stories, and following Halâs lead and taking her own stand. Sheâs the one who put the Faerie Doors at the front, her love of stories and history was what changed the blades into something new.
Shadia and Alogar are foils to the children of the Sundered Houses and Shapers. Theyâre inspired by their family but not controlled by them, theyâre deeply loved but not coddled. Their parents want them to be safe, but still have faith that they can hold their own. They respect their childrenâs autonomy. They take after their parents because their parents loved them and gave them the space to choose their own paths. They donât need their parents and are not forced into depending on them (as we see with Sylandri.)
I donât really have the words to finish my thoughts on this, just feeling sappy about how family is explored in this season.
actually looking through the information we have about the people of araman and the sundered houses and iâve realized that there are like no orcs represented in any of these positions of great power that control the worldâs political machinations
and it makes the halovarâs control over and manipulations of halâs theater even more despicably evil because that is the site of the rungjaniâs suffering. itâs the site where their people were forced into worship and where they are trying to reclaim their history and a bunch of human houses blessed by the gods (who are dead and gone and who cares about them anyway), are throwing their weight around with it. the council, or the chamber of the lords advisory decided whether or not hal got this site. the halovar are deciding what history gets told there. not a single orc is involved in that decision making. and when thaisha calls this out, that itâs her peopleâs history and truth that yanessaâs reshaping, sheâs completely dismissed, despite the fact that she is right and also her family name should give her a level of status that the halovar should respect, if not consider an equal (not that she should need that status to be listened to).
itâs despicably evil. and as brennan says âYOU CANâT PROVE THEREâS ALLEGORY HEREâ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
summer sketches đž
Ive been chewing on this for a minute
I dont think that the insinuation from Einfasen was that Azune is one of theirs. I think Otto's insinuation, especially because he says something like "we'd be lucky if you were one of ours" is that Azune is a sorcerer from a Sundered House. But not one we've seen yet. One of the lost ones that died out in the Shaper's War. And that Otto thinks someone needs to figure out which lost heir to a destroyed Sundered House he's found.
I think they wish he was theirs. And they know he isn't.
i'm a big sucker for a diegetic piece of art/literature serving as a mirror to the story's characters, so naturally the illustration of the poem about a silverleaf tree falling in love with a star from chapter 47 of WHA *had* to be redrawn as Qifrey and Oru â¨đ
tip jar!
aaand a rotated version under the cut for easier Oru appreciation!
the problem with fantasyposting on here is the amount of people who try to "um actually" you on the basis that your post doesn't comply with the rules/mechanics/worldbuilding of dungeons and dragons
A non-writer asked me "but where do you get your ideas" and i genuinely did not know how to explain that it's not a place. it's not a website. it's not a folder. it's that i was on the bus and a woman was holding a paper bag very carefully and something about the way she held it made me need to know what was inside and then i needed to know why she was sad about it and then there was a whole person and then there was a whole story and the bus had already stopped and i missed my stop. that's where.
i swear you can almost tell if someone's never read a book in their life by the overly quantitative understanding of art and this weird fixation on Ideas and the ownership thereof.
people are taught to view art the way they're taught to view basically anything else, which is as a product that neatly fits on graphs and in categories and whatnot. which is a means of making a living and maybe even asserting ownership of something significant. now i don't have the time or energy to elaborate but that's a sad thing

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
if you dont decouple your drive to create from your desire for attention you will go insane. simple as. you will never feel satisfied b/c you will always want more and you will feel perpetually bitter that you did not get what you are âowedâ
Itâs an unpopular opinion but it is absolutely and completely true. Iâve never seen someone who creates for engagement happy with the engagement they get. I posit they canât ever be happy that way because it will NEVER be enough
I agree with OP and Manka so very much.
You have to rest in your own desire to create.
But, because I see statements like this turn into a sort of general notion of âitâs bad to want validation or attention or engagementâ, and to me, thatâs not what this means.
Itâs perfectly valid to want people to like and engage with what you create. In a general sense, when you create anything, you do it to share with other human beings. Art, craft, food, anything you create is a way to connect with others through our shared humanity.
And wanting someone to like you fanart or read your fanfic is part of that.
the words used by OP is decouple, and this is important. Nothing wrong wanting engagement. But it cannot be tightly coupled with the drive to create.
âI think she hated us.â Couldnât get this conversation out of my mind holy crap I need more Vaelus lore
More than "here in the Southern Hemisphere we have inverted seasons :)" thing, which is TECHNICALLY true, I would go a step further and encourage to think about that "much of the world does not exactly has a spring-summer-fall-winter season sequence as they show in cartoons"
I will scream about this to anyone who listens forever. AUSTRALIA DOES NOT HAVE "ENGLISH SEASONS BUT BACKWARDS" and the insistence that it does creates a massive layer of alienation from the natural world.
I never really realised how much difference it makes until I went to England and realised that here the change of seasons is an obvious, visible, physical change in the world. Like, everything REALLY IS orange and foggy in autumn! In spring there are flowers EVERYWHERE, so much more than any other season, and the trees really do have all blossom and no leaves. Even if it doesn't snow, in winter there's frost all the time and the trees are bare and the sky is visibly greyer all the time. You don't need to be told "this date is the first day of spring", you can SEE IT (although this is getting way messier and less precise due to climate change).
By contrast, most places in Australia the seasons we're taught feel like arbitrary categories - and is it any surprise considering they're colonial constructs? Orange-leaved autumn and blossom-covered spring is a cartoon stereotype with no relevance on a continent where ALL NATIVE TREES ARE EVERGREEN!! Snowy winters are a joke in the desert, and even sunny summers don't ring particularly true considering that much of the country is in the tropics, where summer means monsoons - not that I've ever seen the concept that WE HAVE A MONSOON SEASON taught at an Australian school.
Most Indigenous nations around Australia had six or more seasons, revolving around wet and dry times as much as hot and cold, and marked by the appearances of certain native animals and flowers. Schools need to start teaching the real seasons, and explaining that climate cycles are too complex to generalise globally, or else we will keep raising generations who view the natural world as hostile and unpredictable and climate predictions as generally irrelevent and frequently wrong - and I'm sure I don't need to spell out why that's a problem in the era of climate crisis.
i want to add that 40% of the world's population lives in the tropics, and the 4 season model just doesn't make much sense for a lot of places in there. usually it's just the wet season/monsoon season and the dry season. it's often hot year round.
the 4 season model as you and i know it is a european invention, though 4 season models aren't unique to europe! most notably china has the same type of season subdivision.
in general the way humans define seasons is largely subjective and varies across cultures. the one you were taught is not at all universal!
Sooooo guess who went a bit nuts and made a 10 pages comic of the continuation of last nightâs drawing? Me!
Idk if I gave Aldreda too much credit, but I do feel like sheâs more upset in Lucien ignoring her letters and went awol than really criticizing on his lifestyle, and combine that with her being post partum at that time, hence why she was like that in the novel..
Essek is a bit ooc i think, but i think his train of thought is Aldreda made Kingsley upset in the street => enemy! And heâs just genuinely protective of the Neins in general~
Hehehe i just wanted a closure in the Tavelle siblings plotline, and here it is đĽşđĽşđĽş

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
kings of spades
a character that's going thru a redemption arc doesn't actually have to be penalized or atone via community service or whatever for whatever bad thing they've done because what's the point of that. suffering can be a motive for the bad things they do just as much as it could be part of the redemption arc - meaning that the suffering in itself isn't what makes a character good or bad. it's just A Thing That Happens. and i think that redemption-related suffering is boring unless âď¸ it is self-inflicted AND âď¸ it is seen as self-destructive/selfish/useless/etc
a previously evil/redeemed character who does good things now should be doing them because they want to, not because they feel like they have to repent or whatever. UNLESS. that repentance is self-destructive, a sign of a lack of actual growth, or sexy
"im so sorry for what i've done and i shall build a hundred orphanages to atone" unsexy, maybe a sign of growth?, boring
"im so sorry for what i've done and im going to fight on the front lines and possibly die to make up for it" self destructive, implies they still want for violence, could have interesting consequences, sexy