[screams in Theorist]

Example: It was implied Johnny Toast accidentally killed his wife with British Disco.

WHAT DO YOU THINK THAT WORD MEANS

IT WAS A STATED FACT WHAT DO YOU THINK THAT WORD MEANS.

Implied would IMPLY there is minimal evidence and a counter argument to be had WHICH THERE IS NOT

British disco killed Johnny Toast’s first wife which brought him back onto the pie team, these are our EARLY DAY BASICS and then THEN

HIS WIFE’S WIKI: This is Johnny Toast's late wife. She married Johnny and died from Johnny's British Disco in 1976, when Johnny was 20. This led to Johnny's drinking problem. She is a minor character in Toast's Beginning. Although not mentioned by name, the character of Johnny Toast's late wife is acknowledged by Jordan and the crew in many videos. The fanon name for her is Mary, with her fanon maiden name being Petrova, though this is unconfirmed by VT.

THAT. THAT IS HOW YOU WRITE A WIKI. THIS IS THE MOST BASIC THING YOU CAN DO BUT THE BAR IS SO LOW I CAN PRAISE BARE MINIMUM. YOU STATE FANON AGAINST CANON, YOU PROVIDE INFORMATION AND CONTEXT, AND YOU DO NOT SUBSTITUTE IMPLICATION AS A STAND IN WORD FOR FACT. WHY ISNT BRITISH DISCOS WIKI FOLLOWING THIS SAME LOGIC. WHY ARE MOST OF THE WIKI PAGES NOT WIKI’ING RIGHT.

Not even mentioning the amount of edits the wiki has had to make for wrongly stating fanon without crediting where it came from and instead noting it along canon information- THE WIKI ALSO NEVER CITES SHIT? LIKE 99% OF THE TIME AND WHEN THEY DO THEY SELDOM DO IT RIGHT

We have hundreds of pie videos alone, which is what I’m breaking down I focus on pie specifically. Pie is the tool used in VT that can explain all the weird shit that happens in every other cast’s lives because pie knows what’s wrong that makes the 1st dimension such a hotspot.

HUNDREDS OF VIDEOS ranging close to in or over TWENTY MINUTES IN LENGTH EACH. You can not just provide one video link ESPECIALLY WHEN DISCUSSING INFORMATION SPANNING MULTIPLE VIDEOS without occasional TIMESTAMPS.

If you were just- I don’t know- going through the whole plot sure. But if an especially critical point comes up do not just mention it TIME STAMP IT. ESPECIALLY WHEN THE WIKI HAS A REPUTATION FOR BEING WRONG LET THE READER CHECK YOUR SOURCE.

This is such a nonissue this is only affecting like me and me alone because I’m the masochist who tried to put the term canon compliant and pie together BUT IT BOTHERS ME I know it’s just a fun wiki for a fun nonsensical world with nonsensical lore BUT IM TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS SOLID GROUND AND I NEED A SOURCE TO LOOK TOWARDS.