1. What do you understand by the term, ‘the transport of meaning’ and in what ways can this phenomenon be problematic in the world of branding?
A. Transport of meaning refers to the effectiveness if communication channels The three problems defines are technical problem, the semantic problem and the effectiveness problem. It becomes a problem when the branding doesn’t correctly represent the operating body.
We read signs based on where we are from and the experiences we’ve had. we are signs we carry different symbolisms in what we wear. One of the good things in semiotics is that we can use it anywhere.
Sound is interesting too for example someone’s accent, noise of a dog, Mc Donald's “para pa pa pa” jingle, again these can be perceived differently by people depending on their background and ethnic background.
“The death of the author”
“reading is an act of process of creating meaning” this means that people are creating meaning as they read, so sometimes they might perceive the information different from what was intended.
2. Explain Marshall McLuhan’s notion that ‘the medium is the message’ and discuss the roles of channels, media and formats in the production of meaning in branding.
McLuhan argues that “The medium is a message”, focusing on various aspects of the ones who deliver the message: Their knowledge, technology, education, background, regulations, etc.
The medium adds meaning to the message, it affects the way the message is received for example, listening to television news and reading the same news on paper will be different because it gives a different feeling.
3. Apply each of Roman Jakobsen’s six factors of communication to six different brands, explaining how each function works in terms of how that brand communicates its message.
Semiosphere is the sphere of semiosis in which sign processes operate in the set of all interconnected Umwelten. The concept was coined by Juri Lotman in 1982 and is now applied to many fields, including cultural semiotics generally, biosemiotics, zoosemiotics, geosemiotics, etc.
This is the Piccadilly circus.
Here is a quick breakdown of semiotics
According to Pierce there are three different types of signs.
Iconic signs: signs where the signifier resembles the signified, e.g., a picture.
INDEXICAL SIGNS (pointing sign, index finger)
Indexical Signs: signs where the signifier is caused by the signified, e.g., smoke signifies fire. Denotation: the most basic or literal meaning of a sign, e.g., the word "rose" signifies a particular kind of flower.
Indexical signs are quite space related, and to helps identify the way in which the space can be operated by representing the objects they stand for.
Symbolic (arbitrary) signs: signs where the relation between signifier and signified is purely conventional and culturally specific, e.g., most words.
Symbolic signs no meaning to the actual object, they are linked to their object through a learned convention. A person has to be from a culture or familiar with the meaning of the sign in order to know what it means.
Signifier; Dad in different languages
signified; Dad (father of someone)
Symbolic signs are considered arbitrary because they
These are Arbitrary symbols that relate to religion, they represent the respective religions and you would expect to see them in their respective environments.
These male and female signs can me seen as arbitrary or symbolic because it’s the general sign used to identify both genders. They don't don’t specifically tie or relate to a public space but they can be included where appropriate.
Warning signs have are arbitrary, because we have learnt to associate them with danger whenever we see them. The colour yellow is symbolic to danger, animals that have yellow coating on them can be deemed dangerous.
The triangle is an international convention and universal symbol of the word “caution”