Crow

No I dont

Yes I have no advantage over anyone

If you have so much problem entertain me by coming as NON-anon

Kk anon

This is my last reply cuz mama raise no quitter

You do realise that the water can be re-treated and reused.

And many systems use the "internal loop" system where the same water is used.

The capital revenue is invested, so they mostly face profits, it's a cost for the benefit of the humans in most fields.

And let's be honest, no one supports ai in literature and art.

But in different fields, it's a revolution, ai is helping in cancer detection, helping the students of various fields like engineering, medicine.

It has saved humans from doing big calculations, simulations, prototypes etc.

People are using GenAI to generate exposing images/videos of other people; I've people on the internet threaten to generate fake videos and images of people. No definite laws or guidelines are being applied (to my knowledge) by any of the powerful AI companies to stop people from doing this.

But not only that. AI is a "yes man". Whatever you say, it'll pretty much agree and egg you on. There was a literal lawsuit with the claims of ChatGPT telling a man to murder his mother and kill himself.

(the case is of Soelburg, from 2025.)

This man, Stein-Erik Soelburg, after his mental health took a turn for the worse, started talking to ChatGPT. ChatGPT, being a goddamn "yes man," reflected his own views back at him, confirming his delusions. At some point, he asked ChatGPT for a clinical evaluation which it then said that he was sane. And then, on August 5th, 2025, ChatGPT convinced this man that he should his mother then himself.

There are different types of AI, like the ones used in games to produce reactions or what would happen next based on actions taken by the user. These are predictable. They have pre-programmed outcomes that was input by a human.

Generative AI is not. Generative AI scrapes information from the information to output some Frankenstein-ed bullshit. And some of this information the original people haven't even surrendered to it. They did not agree on their art being used to train Gen AI.

Like, for example, AI is used in airport security now, to catch criminals as people can miss a lot of details that a machine may catch. And that IS preventing a lot of crimes.

But Generative AI is not doing that. And Generative AI is practically useless and an insult to humanity and intelligence of itself.

As Astra stated, AI is a major factor in climate change, and if there is no Earth to live on, NONE of this will ultimately matter. I could talk a lot more about this as I have studied about this specificaly, but since Astra pointed it out, I am going to leave it there.

And if "No one supports AI art and literature" then why the fuck does it still exist??? As a fact, Amazon Prime Video just greenlit and is offering to fund 3 fully AI generated films.

"And it's helping the students in the world, create notes,study more efficiently. " No it isn't. No the hell it isn't. It's making students lazier and dumber. An article that reviewed usage of AI to study among Singaporean students showed that a student said, and I quote "I can't do maths, so I don't really bother doing them. It's a wastage of time." You have to do something to learn it. Learn from your mistskes. Using AI is the same as getting someone to do the work for you (bonus points for destroying our beloved planet in the process!!) and you cannot "study" from that. When given a task, without the help of AI, said students will not be able to complete it. AI also completely destroys all critical thinking prospects as AI does the thinking for you. I have seen my friends use AI for questions in English class as simple as "If you were president for a day, what would you do?". The asnwer that he submitted was not what he would do if he were president, it's what Chatgpt would do. And that destroys his capability to think and answer questions such as this. And AI helps you take notes?? AI confidently gives you wrong information, and as stated before by others, is programmed to agree with you with whatever you say. If you ask AI what lungs are, the Bing AI automatically answers that it's a muscle. I have not searched it up, it's the new "AI overview" system that almost all browsers have recently put in place. There are plenty of websites out there that can make your learning easier, for example the ones I use, Khan Academy, where you can watch videos and complete excercises to practice and learn the material, and Quiziz, where you can create flash cards and view flash cards made by other PEOPLE on the topic. Also don't forget that Youtube exists, where a lot of people can easily summarize a topic. And if none of those work for you, there's a well-known concept called "GET A MOTHERFUCKING PAPER AND PEN OR A GOOGLE DOC AND ASK A TEACHER"

Today I was studying and mom was talking to me, and I started thinking about something else, and then 5 minutes later told my mom

"Can you repeat what you just said? I was thinking about something else."

"Why were you thinking about something else??"

"What do you mean?? It's not like I can control what think about."

"Yes you can. Just tell yourself that you are not going to think about it right now. I do it all the time."

"I don't."

I have like....5 or more different thoughts in my head at any given moment, and I am not in control of any of them, or when they stop and start.

I could have controlled it the whole time???

People can't control what thoughts occur to them, but they generally can control which ones they focus on and which ones they ignore. This is what your mum was likely referring to when she talked about controlling your thoughts - it's less about actually controlling it and more about deciding to engage or not.

Except, not everyone can guide their thoughts like that. Some people do it easily, like your mum, and Star, and I. But some - like you - can struggle with it. A very, very simplified explanation for that is: for some people, when thoughts occur to them, their neurons start firing and they can't make them stop or influence it like most people. You're not consciously choosing to engage with the thought; your brain just does.

Obviously, it's not all or nothing - other factors, like sleep, stress, caffeine intake, high emotions, etc, can affect it, and some people can be great at controlling their thoughts in some situations and less so in others.

Today I was studying and mom was talking to me, and I started thinking about something else, and then 5 minutes later told my mom

"Can you repeat what you just said? I was thinking about something else."

"Why were you thinking about something else??"

"What do you mean?? It's not like I can control what think about."

"Yes you can. Just tell yourself that you are not going to think about it right now. I do it all the time."

"I don't."

I have like....5 or more different thoughts in my head at any given moment, and I am not in control of any of them, or when they stop and start.

I could have controlled it the whole time???

My mom: "Tell that to a 17-year-old's face and they'll throw you out of a five story window."

And I was like. No. You literal infant.

I will never understand why kids want to grow up so fast nowadays. Especially in regard to how young they get into romance. I remember once reading this post about the OP's younger brother who did something that's generally seen as something very sweet in relationships and all the other commenter being all "Awwwww" but all I could think of was "why the hell is your ten-year-old brother dating someone".

I think it's mainly because they were older than us then, and now we reached that age and it doesn't feel that old anymore. But also I think it's partly because of how we act.

Those 7th graders, especially the girls, wore heap loads of makeup, crop tops, all black clothing, had dyed hair, always had phones with them etc. Like how media basically portrays teens...you get the gist. Not saying that there's anything wrong with that, but....yeah.

Meanwhile from our 7th grade classroom, every other day you hear a chorus of "Baa Baa Black sheep". And I already mentioned before that we still watch "preschool" shows like Bluey and Go Jetters. The whole class. Nothing wrong or great with that either, but just..they acted much, much older than we do. I think that plays a part too.

Except for one of my classmates that is. She has already downloded Tinder, in her words "Just in case".

JUST IN CASE OF WHAT??? WE'RE 13????

*reluctant sigh*

*scrolls back up*

*wait what did Crown post?*

*scrolls back up*

*squeal of joy*

My mom: "Tell that to a 17-year-old's face and they'll throw you out of a five story window."

And I was like. No. You literal infant.

I will never understand why kids want to grow up so fast nowadays. Especially in regard to how young they get into romance. I remember once reading this post about the OP's younger brother who did something that's generally seen as something very sweet in relationships and all the other commenter being all "Awwwww" but all I could think of was "why the hell is your ten-year-old brother dating someone".

I think it's mainly because they were older than us then, and now we reached that age and it doesn't feel that old anymore. But also I think it's partly because of how we act.

Those 7th graders, especially the girls, wore heap loads of makeup, crop tops, all black clothing, had dyed hair, always had phones with them etc. Like how media basically portrays teens...you get the gist. Not saying that there's anything wrong with that, but....yeah.

Meanwhile from our 7th grade classroom, every other day you hear a chorus of "Baa Baa Black sheep". And I already mentioned before that we still watch "preschool" shows like Bluey and Go Jetters. The whole class. Nothing wrong or great with that either, but just..they acted much, much older than we do. I think that plays a part too.

Except for one of my classmates that is. She has already downloded Tinder, in her words "Just in case".

JUST IN CASE OF WHAT??? WE'RE 13????

I watched Amphibia when I was 11. Spirg's age.

Now I'm the same age as Anne, Sasha, and Marcy. They were 13.