Nostalgia

Bunny GIFs.

And please don’t say: “But they didn’t know what asexuality was back then, so it doesn’t count” because it will make you sound very stupid. They also didn’t know what homosexuality was by our modern definition of the term and they still discriminated against people we would consider homosexual today, no one would ever try to deny that happened. Asexual people, by the modern definition of the term, existed in history, even if they might have been called something else or nothing at all. They didn’t use the term “homosexual” in the early nineteenth century either, they didn’t even believe a man could truly ever love a man like a man was supposed to love a woman and still men, who were homosexual by the modern meaning of the word, were hanged for having sex (last hanging for “buggery” in Britain was in the 1830s) , just like women who we’d define as asexual today were raped and abused for not having sex in the name of science and medicine. This happened. There might not have been a big moral panic concerning “asexuality” like there was concerning “homosexuality” during the fin de siècle but just because discrimination is more sublte or happening behind closed doors doesn’t mean it’s not there. Always remember that. 

This is part of our history as a community and I really can’t wrap my head around the fact that some people in this community are trying to erase it, to exclude a part of the community because they feel these people haven’t been discriminated against enough. What is up with that? Why would you do that? And maybe, just maybe, before you go around claiming this stuff - Do a lot of research on historical conceptions of sexuality. Applying modern terms and concepts to the people of the past is tricky and I get why you’d do it because it’s easier (I do it myself sometimes) but you need to be aware that these terms meant something else back then. For example, “bisexual” in the early 1900s meant someone who perceived themselves as both male and female. That is not the modern meaning of the term and just like that other modern terms meant something different back then and you need to consider that. 

I’d advise everyone who’d like to really talk about these matters to just sit down and study up on historical conceptions of sexuality, queerness and gender because if you don’t you’ll try to put modern terms, labels and concepts on people of the past and that is dangerous to say the least. It leads to exclusion, erasure and misinformation about the past, about “queer” people of the past and most of all these peoples’ own self-perception that will most likely not match up with our modern concepts, terms and self-perceptions. We need to talk about the history of discrimination against LGBTIA people, we really need to do this, but we need to do it without erasing parts of the historical discrimination against them and some people really need to stop trying to revise history until it matches their personal ideas of the past. If you only want to talk about LGBTIA history to exclude people you don’t want inside the community I can’t stop you but please be aware of how ignorant you’ll sound to anyone who knows anything about actual LGBTIA history and historical conceptions of sexuality and gender.  PS: This is absolutely basic and vague and not at all well put but I don’t feel like going into too much detail and spending my whole evening writing this post. I might do that in the future because this subject is important to me but right now I just need to rant. :’)

BANDS JUDY HOPPS LISTENS TO: The Beagles, Black Sable, Catty Perry, Destiny’s Cub, Ewe 2, Fleetwood Yak, Fur Fighters, Gazelle, Guns N’ Rodents, Hyena Gomez, Kanine West, Mick Jaguar

DUUUUMMMPPP.  My environment contributions to Zootopia. And some random graphic design for signs and animal clothing.

What. Fucking. Privileges. Do. Men. Have.???????

Name them. I swear, I challenge you to name these “male privileges" and be able to prove them. 

Come on, I fucking dare you. 

My odds of being hired for a job, when competing against female applicants, are probably skewed in my favor. The more prestigious the job, the larger the odds are skewed.

I can be confident in the fact that my co-workers won’t think that I was hired/promoted because of my sex - despite the fact that it’s probably true.

If I ever am promoted when a woman of my peers is better suited for the job, it is because of my sex.

If i ever fail at my job or career, it won’t be seen as a blacklist against my sex’s capabilities.

I am far less likely to face sexual harassment than my female peers.

If I do the same task as a woman, and if the measurement is at all subjective, chances are people will think I did a better job.

If I am a teen or an adult, and I stay out of prison, my odds of getting raped are relatively low.

On average, I’m taught that walking alone after dark by myself is less than dangerous than it is for my female peers.

If I choose not to have children, my masculinity will not be questioned.

If I do have children but I do not provide primary care for them, my masculinity will not be questioned.

If I have children and I do care for them, I’ll be praised even if my care is only marginally competent.

If I have children and a career, no one will think I’m selfish for not staying at home.

If I seek political office, my relationship with my children or who I deem to take care of them will more often not be scrutinized by the press.

My elected representatives are mostly people of my own sex. The more prestigious the position, the more this is true.

When i seek out “the person in charge", it is likely that they will be someone of my own sex. The higher the position, the more often this is true.

As a child, chances are I am encouraged to be more active and outgoing than my sisters.

As a child, I could choose from an almost infinite variety of children’s media featuring positive, active, non-stereotyped heroes of my own sex. I never had to look for it; male protagonists were (and are) the default.

As a child, chances are I got more teacher attention than girls who raised their hands just as often.

If my day, week or year is going badly, I need not ask of each negative episode or situation whether or not it has sexist overtones. (Nobody’s going to ask if I’m upset because I’m menstruating.)

I can turn on the television or glance at the front page of the newspaper and see people of my own sex widely represented.

If I’m careless with my financial affairs it won’t be attributed to my sex.

If I’m careless with my driving it won’t be attributed to my sex.

I can speak in public to a large group without putting my sex on trial.

Even if I sleep with a lot of women, there is little to no chance that I will be seriously labeled a “slut,” nor is there any male counterpart to “slut-bashing.”

I do not have to worry about the message my wardrobe sends about my sexual availability.

My clothing is typically less expensive and better-constructed than women’s clothing for the same social status. While I have fewer options, my clothes will probably fit better than a woman’s without tailoring.

The grooming regimen expected of me is relatively cheap and consumes little time.

If I buy a new car, chances are I’ll be offered a better price than a woman buying the same car. The same goes for other expensive merchandise.

If I’m not conventionally attractive, the disadvantages are relatively small and easy to ignore.

I can be loud with no fear of being called a shrew. I can be aggressive with no fear of being called a bitch.

I can ask for legal protection from violence that happens mostly to men without being seen as a selfish special interest, since that kind of violence is called “crime” and is a general social concern. (Violence that happens mostly to women is usually called “domestic violence” or “acquaintance rape,” and is seen as a special interest issue.)

I can be confident that the ordinary language of day-to-day existence will always include my sex. “All men are created equal,” mailman, chairman, freshman, he.

My ability to make important decisions and my capability in general will never be questioned depending on what time of the month it is.

I will never be expected to change my name upon marriage or questioned if I don’t change my name.

The decision to hire me will not be based on assumptions about whether or not I might choose to have a family sometime soon.

Every major religion in the world is led primarily by people of my own sex. Even God, in most major religions, is pictured as male.

Most major religions argue that I should be the head of my household, while my wife and children should be subservient to me.

If I have a wife or live-in girlfriend, chances are we’ll divide up household chores so that she does most of the labor, and in particular the most repetitive and unrewarding tasks.

If I have children with my girlfriend or wife, I can expect her to do most of the basic childcare such as changing diapers and feeding.

If I have children with my wife or girlfriend, and it turns out that one of us needs to make career sacrifices to raise the kids, chances are we’ll both assume the career sacrificed should be hers.

Assuming I am heterosexual, magazines, billboards, television, movies, pornography, and virtually all of media is filled with images of scantily-clad women intended to appeal to me sexually. Such images of men exist, but are rarer.

In general, I am under much less pressure to be thin than my female counterparts are. If I am over-weight, I probably suffer fewer social and economic consequences for being fat than over-weight women do.

 If I am heterosexual, it’s incredibly unlikely that I’ll ever be beaten up by a spouse or lover.

Complete strangers generally do not walk up to me on the street and tell me to “smile.”

Sexual harassment on the street virtually never happens to me. I do not need to plot my movements through public space in order to avoid being sexually harassed, or to mitigate sexual harassment.

On average, I am not interrupted by women as often as women are interrupted by men.

On average, I will have the privilege of not knowing about my male privilege.

And lastly, I am taken as a more credible feminist than my female peers, despite the fact that the feminist movement is not liberating to my sex.