Far, Fox

Just as you transformed from toddler to adult, from fetus to baby, you go from alive to corpse. Our minds create the sense we have been here since ever a times and finds it hard to believe in continuation, yet all that makes us adults will disappear just as the individuality that made us toddlers. The delusion is mechanically present and rooted in a poor first intuitive guess, like someone waking up after sleep and briefly being isolated from the rest of their life in a sense of false eternity, that is very clear. That is why we need clocks and sun etc to tell the time, our precision of understanding the passage time is marked by relative perception of events and cycles though it is purely an issue of poor temporal perception. The only explanations for my dreams as a fox I have is a) some sort of unknown memory transfer has occurred via DNA/virus (I hear some claims of memory transfer with organ transplants), amd b) some kind of quantum pattern convergence serving as a portal, a unusual phase disturbance. I don't know, though, seems unlikely, kind of, even if it is so, that's why I seek solution but so far suggestion seems equally wrong. I did not grow up around foxes or similar animals, I was home educated at the age it started and after the age of 12ish I returned to home education away from the internet when I was really discovering myself. I had no friends, really, schools taught little zoology and I did not read or play video games with animals in them really, my parents were poor and I never really had friends or relatives to tell me stories or show me pictures of foxex. Judging from some of my dreams, it seems they occur in past present and future, they are realistic not toony or anything. I do have some sleep problems that prpbably limit my REM. It could be like OOBE, my father had one with many witnesses when he was younger, he saw what could not be known and people were surprised by it. It could be in the family, like an ability but it seems strange. I have sensory oddities like visual snow so to speak, I see like a form constant in the centre of my vision but have never taken drugs. I've had brain scans due to these things. It seems my pineal gland is very keen, that tends to happen with drug stimulation and hallucinations seems to adhere to quantum phenomenom, the brain does adhere to quantum vibrations and all sorts of weird stuff can happen on a quantum level it seems. That sounds kind of New Age to me so I tend to feel like I am seeing patterns in the data that aren't there in self-discovery, like how we have a sensory organ in pur heads that corresponds to the third eye's position sounds kind of hippieish. But in terms of after life, may be experience is convergent, individuality is the illusion of system, we are a mass of cells which in turn are made from smaller particles, not a singularity so what if all cells in the universe are thus the essence of the self experience. I can consider the individual experience as synchronised, that all particles are experiential and anyway we know experience is built upon physical state and interaction in consciousness physically encodes sensaation. When does "I" become "you" as another person? It seems by the lack of recogition of what is the same part on a relative spatial level. If I split myself into two, which I could do by chopping myself (brain included) equally in half (even though I wish not x3) and for a brief second at least, my sense of self will be in two places in once, only now I cannot communicate with the rest of me, so the other part of my brain can be considered a "you" inside of a "me". What if then we are all the same, which is seems that we damn well are, derivate from a singularity that separated in the big bang that can knit itself together to re-synchronise its experience? Well then, there is no end to experience by death, only the reduction of self perception for an area of matter. The question is, what happens to the actual thread of individual experiencw? Well, we are always changing so never in one time are we equal to the previous experience, and it is that window that differentiates us from the previous framwe of experience. Though, we perceive things as multi faceted experience in space and time. In that case we can use deductive logic or inductive logic but as observers we start to get nowhere it seems. I can, however, assume, personally, that, the sense of what spiritual people call soul is an illusion and fundamentally if I speak as that singularity that started the universe which is experiencing itself, then I am all the cells in my brain, all the cwlls in yours, all the particles that make up the planet and the rest of the universe. Now, that is a scary thought. May be we are subconsciously aware of this, and the reason why we have empathies and such is to serve as a barrier to protect our other cells that make up my/your/our univereal eperience from being a dissatisfactory one. May be selfishism is just isolation and selflessness by selfish experience motivations isn't and is selfishness at the same time, being if everything is ultimately a whole (which is what the word universe means, after all) then it doesn't matter. That would be the foundation of the subjectivity and objectivity contrast, as you cannot have objectivity with subjects to cover, and you cannot have subjectivity without objective reality. Then everything sits in the same actuality, even alternate senses of reality and then the only subjectivity (particle, experience) is a perceptive phenomenom, a point of place, an angle on and within the whole. As an aside, as for what happens to the projection of the individual thread of experience, may be it is kind of like a bubble of reality within actuality, a quantum experience that can collapse. Then if experience is like a bubble, what happens to said bubbles? Well, inductively, we could say, that bubbles that pop reappear as smaller bubbles elsewhere and grow into bigger bubbles where they can connect together as the same experiential essence which is pretty much what life looks like, smaller bubbles (say, cells) merging to create bigger ones. That is very interesting, indeed, perhaps then we just continue as our fragments of particles. And then for a while we split into a multitude of parts. But then we have a problem, what if those smaller bubbles go in one direction and build a bigger bubble of incarnation elsewhere? May be as said before, we just become two selves and there's like a paralell universe like self difference by experience. May be the biggest bubble to become self conscious enough first dominates as a resolution as your sense of consciousness. Or may be the bubble pops at biological death, but then we are still reacting on a fragmented level. There are so many theories and the reality may even vary from case to case, I don't know. Continuation seems logical, energy has to go somewhere and energy is the foundation of experience. Though note this, I said you could temporarily split an organism even if it be fatal in the long run (well beside the organisms who can split near enough all the time), though as you think everyday you are rarely one active at once in the flow of thought and the brain may temporarily lpse significant activity, neurons may die and data of the self may resolve elsewhere. So we are constantly split and alive. I see two logical explanations only here, already outruling the fact we are (or at least I am) not philosophical zombies, that a) individuality is an illusion we simply cannot grasp for a period of time long enough due to the gap of connections that pass the realisations and observer problems are existent even in quantum mechanics on a fundamental level, or b) the mechanics of life experience exceeds physics and is only a converging dimension to the physical, so to speak. Though, (b) does not imply in a magcal realm of unicorns and winged angelic beings etc, I should say that is a intuitive experience of the mind, yet psychedelic phenomena would be closer to the physical quantum and experiential barrier, where patterns of experience seem logical yet surpass sensory significance.

So, the second law of thermodynamics is increasingly refuted, just to note. Quantum mechanics shows energy reacts differently on different levels of scale and that interval (time cycle) is just the gap between quantum events and that can jump back and forth in time. Quantum physics contradicts the 2nd law of thermodynamics, thus, it seems. 2nd law of thermodynamics uses physics of relativity and quantum mechanics is convergent, that meaning the universe is singularity that divided into a constant number of planck/vibrating packets that pop in and out of existence. Whether in or out of reality at one point, all packets are aware of each other once they pop back into reality as actuality is a singularity. But imagine that temporarily these packets will jump into a similar existence, where they are affected in this existence by the alternate version of the local states meaning they get skewed with a level of uncertainty (dimensional irrational numbers such as pi are constants). It is known that the brain uses a kind of quantum level computing of data and that our sensory organs can pick up frequencies equal to the width of lower state particles (affecting perceived level of energy even at the smallest degree at least somewhat, this can be described like headroom is to a mixing engineer in music in regards to the root mean square of variant frequency energy of incoming pressure waves). It is also possible for quanta that arises thought packets to jump out of actuality and be altered by this uncertainty, that the brain uses signals in such a raw manner it is potentially possible for someone susceptible enough to be affected by two alternate realities. This happens on a low level, however, and such reality arising to complex fantastical thinking (which often quantum woo is based upon) seems improbable. Though, in the theories surrounding nonlocality, since the universe uses packets that build up into similar packets due to the universal law of physics, then the universe is a build up of self experiential data, and digits/quanta are analogous and convergent. This means when this data is forced to experience its own patterns via a system, it becomes conscious (to the degree the organisation of thought the organism's structure permits which is more or less regarding the organism's needs on a mechanic level). Self experiential data then becomes individual thought and feeling. If you remove this physical mechanism or alter the data, it ceases to understand its experience therefore lacks experience yet is still an experience in itself and all physical things can be sensed and become recycled into another organism. So we are merely temporary quantum structures. You may be interested in also Freeman Dyson's alternative to the theory which is a more classical solution to the 2nd law of thermodynamics. He argues that thermodynamics was something that came out of the industrial revolution as a quick jump 0f mathematical solution which was very much so, many people believed energy evaporated back then yet we know it does not and that gravity was ignored. The universe increases in local structure as it expands but then also merges this, like as if it is repairing itself. On Earth we are surrounded by air which is not equal to vacuum, heat expands through the air to equalise, thus things cool but a star which is in a vacuum for example does not cool, it gets hotter as it loses packets of mass, this is because the energy then is the same but less area to cover. A star tries to expand to compensate for this but the heavier fused mass falls to the core, eventually the outer layers are released but a super dense core is left, it is hotter than the star by overall was yet does not fuse. The white dwarf eventually stops radiating but remains hot from its density, it has nothing to cool into so itself remains hot. That might sound like death still, however, this dense point continues gravity, and by physics the object cannot escape its own gravity but the gravity is not strong enough to create a black hole either, it finds a sort of pseudo entropic equilibrium. If we imagine all that is left in the universe is white dwarves we must then notice that stars will occasionally collide with another, merging, reigniting as stars and the process in theory would continue. But basically, light would end but the univerxe would continue to appropriate new evolutions of order. I don't have full faith in Dyson's theories but they are just as evidential as other ones a lot of the time. We can never tell the truth without literally interacting with a star but if something is heavy enough to remain hot for potentially forever without using energy particles that can escape the gravity eventually, then it actually does sound more likely. And to use dynamics to refer to all scales in the universe is pretty much inaccurate to do in physics as we know small arrangement leads to a different wider arrangement. Then we have the big crunch theories and such. Interval correlates spatial difference (distance) which is also why we can measure time in cycles and distinguish frequencies from one another. By waves, in sinusoidal measurement we can tell time is also correlative to space, for a cycle to reach its full sinusoidal transfer of energy it creates a circle hence a wave will work out in to a rounded equilibrium at the rate indicated by the peak (rotation). We can find potential by dividing the equilibrium of direction by its interval times two (two due to the inverse square law) which in space is pi = C ÷ radius × 2 which indicates there are three clear potential states with a constant directional entropy of .141592~ and so on which means the universe will always hold this complexity in operation arising illusion of entropy/uncertainty/chaos when really all that it means, being a constant is a shift of order. Energy is transferred in waves but is quanta yet behaves differently on different scales (note double slit experiment). Yet as scale increases so does symmetry, as energy distributes by double at twice the distance so the affect of any structure is twice and so divisible with a higher potential value previously potentially unavailable. Maximum distribution versus big bang singularity - the universe as a singularity would have only value equal to 1, there'd be no irrational recurring value, yet the active universe is entropic due to constant value of the expansion of the 3 dimensions with the constant remainder (as noted in pi) of expansion. The universe has changed in mathematical reality from equal to inequal, yet the opposite to constant 1 is not maximum expansion as there is an addition of entropy therefore maximum distribution is not possible as a opposite of singularity, the constant is a value of constant uncertainty within a compressed area of 3 potential states. Therefore, all lowest state (you can call it planck level) quanta is a derivate not opposing part of 1, it is merely another state of original singularity that is entangled and all quantum packets are the initial universe singularity displaced throughout its own dimensionally derived (quantum organisation) complexity. That also means all quanta in the same reality would be aware (and potentially thus affect) all other quanta being it on the lowest level is the same singularity in a convergent state shifted in space and time by dimensional value (position). This would be described as projection and gives arise to things like perspective in sensory perception which correlates directly to perception of physical quantum states converging closer back to 1 (creating interaction, interactive experience) the convergence can be found when removing entropic differences (which our brains do, as a filter - intuition). It has also lead to benign ideas such as that the universe may be a simulation, though the origins of projection are self-relative which means all things are a multiple of the fundamental singularity, multiply anything by 1 and you will know what I mean here, intuitively - all groups also converge into one, and the mass of everything can be represented as 1, which it is, aka "universe" (uni- meaning one). Thus, universe is a inflated singularity that is self-experiential (observer entangled entropy), convergent (meaning life such as multiple cells can be lead into seeing itself as a single experiential entity) and harmonic (enabling intuition, wave ratio, evenness, and even what we describe as harmonious experience, logic/goodness). There are numerous theories, sadly many are woo based and merely a result of sci-fi belief in some scientists (seeking eternal life, wishing wormholes exist like in childhood tales of portals, etc) but the math clearly adds up ^ If people want to make sense of the universe, it is best not to skew facts, and rather change your perception of what the theory means if one wishes insight. I could say in the end, it all means nothing - but does it? Who knows. Experience seems very important to us, I aim to improve it as much as I can for all life I can, especially if we are the same being confused into individual consciousness through communication break down. Seems knowledge and progression is the fundamental and directly, respectively, of evolution - and it is, all actions are progressions and I don't know about you but I don't want to make a bad step. If good perception and judgement leads to better future experience then it is mounting up to something, I think this is the problem of the over-thinker, doing is far more real in sensation than just thought, it opens the senses to more variables than previously imagined by a closed thought process and a catalyst is whom really shapes reality. May be too much philosophy is just naive, does hypothesis really have a sound argument in a debate? I think you either think right for the real environment or you face the consequences. All I know is I can hold better judgements on such matters for as long as I keep an open mind to the right facts. We coped so far with enough objectivity, we're halfway there it often seems. Yet until subjects recognise they are objects and recognise that they can get on better by compromising in betterment for the overall objective system of this universe, objective logic and subjective opinion cannot apply so well as a part of the same essence. So is the sense of free will of opinion and entropy correlative? Well, thought difference often seems chaotic, but then isn't positively seem things like creativity (organic not just human) seen the same? Then, in our world as we know it, we can notice that it isn't entropy (bad/chaos) vs harmony (good/logical equilibrium) but rather more like, say, experientially defecting entropy and order vs experientially improving entropy and order. I say this as I know many people who act like entropy is some sort of scientific word for evil and destruction and death, but it creates a bit of splendour to the order of things. It seems a mix of good and bad which has lead to philosophies being rooted so much in that good cannot exist without bad, though not everything is conscious so if entropy on a inanimate object for example can be said to be not harmful whereas on a experiential being we can intuitively recognise that chaos upon the experiential being is negative which makes sense for empathy. I doubt life created reproductions of itself to war and consume each other brutally as in a primeval state life was just reactive and mechanically continuous. Yet the increase of perception of universal experience has enabled empathies to evolve. Feelings are something that intellectual thought has evolved from which involve associating a contained sensation with patterns that are say the recognisation of a individual or tool of importance which arises ethics when intermingling system management logic. An ability to think beyond such reactions may lower entropy and since entropy can be a good or bad thing in subjective and objective senses, it can harness to much spontaneity, which is volatile whether we consider a explosively reactive chemicals in a jar or in, say, a brain. The subjective and objective are correlative yet without the objective, the subjective cannot exist, thus in terms of organised life, it must do that to be at best itself, well organised and alive.

Hello Tumblr, this is my introductory post. First off, a little bit about me: I go by Fox, mostly, I have others nicknames though most of them end in Fox, usually. I love many things to quite some degree, though my main focus is on doing my bit for the rest of the world and enjoying all the little of the things in life. I have interests in appreciating music, visual art, foxes, science and wildlife photography. I take knowledge from a wide range of sources and try to apply it intuitively to the things that matter. Framework is very important to my thinking and so is thinking outside of the box by interconnecting these senses of reality into one, far clearer one. I was home educated and now I don't have any offline friends because of that, though that has lead me to discover myself and be open to new ideas away from peer pressure, for example. This blog is mostly for what exceeds response to an internet forum or for exploring hypothesis and varying subjects that I encounter as well as things in general. I can consider myself a therian and often have vivid dreams as foxes, though I have explanations for this even though science is still bridgjng the gap for such experiences. I just take it as another way to look at life and see the urgencies by knowledge that others may never even stop to look at. I am not religious though I may temporarily seek comfort in wishing there to be something there to support me through certain problems. I also don't just follow spiritual beliefs, though I do tolerate (and enjoy for conversation) ones that don't have negative affects on society's ability to make good judgements. My close family has a range of beliefs and I see the common in all of them, the common want is what I try to master to bring harmony to my relations with others in the world. I consider my identity quite displaced, as like with frameworks my understanding rarely fits to one and I don't fit into one community, either. My sense of gender is ambiguous due to myself being therian and may identify as alien it may sound to some as a gender ambiguous fox that hence does not relate much to binary human gender stereotypes internally. I am not a zoophile as I am human on the outside, just to add. I seek people like me which means I prefer relationships with those who tolerate my fox side on the levels it creates needs for me in the outer and inner worlds I consider it a comfort to associate like this and my feelings are honest in respect to themselves and my identity harms no one. I find roleplaying in an intuitive environment such as a text one helps my inner self a bit, even where my fox side crosses with my human sense of self. My external needs are primarily human and based upon my realisations and affections in respect to my inner differences. I think that is pretty much it, I probably sound a bit unusual but I think everyone is a bit that way. It's what binds us that makes us "one". And that's just one reason I'm here. Thanks for reading. Have a great day.