#monoism

new pronouns got DROPPED

I do really enjoy the emphasis on free will and also the implication that even this very flawed, controlling religion assumes bodily autonomy to be basic decency--or at least pays lip service to it. In their own twisted and roundabout way, of course.

Just as you transformed from toddler to adult, from fetus to baby, you go from alive to corpse. Our minds create the sense we have been here since ever a times and finds it hard to believe in continuation, yet all that makes us adults will disappear just as the individuality that made us toddlers. The delusion is mechanically present and rooted in a poor first intuitive guess, like someone waking up after sleep and briefly being isolated from the rest of their life in a sense of false eternity, that is very clear. That is why we need clocks and sun etc to tell the time, our precision of understanding the passage time is marked by relative perception of events and cycles though it is purely an issue of poor temporal perception. The only explanations for my dreams as a fox I have is a) some sort of unknown memory transfer has occurred via DNA/virus (I hear some claims of memory transfer with organ transplants), amd b) some kind of quantum pattern convergence serving as a portal, a unusual phase disturbance. I don't know, though, seems unlikely, kind of, even if it is so, that's why I seek solution but so far suggestion seems equally wrong. I did not grow up around foxes or similar animals, I was home educated at the age it started and after the age of 12ish I returned to home education away from the internet when I was really discovering myself. I had no friends, really, schools taught little zoology and I did not read or play video games with animals in them really, my parents were poor and I never really had friends or relatives to tell me stories or show me pictures of foxex. Judging from some of my dreams, it seems they occur in past present and future, they are realistic not toony or anything. I do have some sleep problems that prpbably limit my REM. It could be like OOBE, my father had one with many witnesses when he was younger, he saw what could not be known and people were surprised by it. It could be in the family, like an ability but it seems strange. I have sensory oddities like visual snow so to speak, I see like a form constant in the centre of my vision but have never taken drugs. I've had brain scans due to these things. It seems my pineal gland is very keen, that tends to happen with drug stimulation and hallucinations seems to adhere to quantum phenomenom, the brain does adhere to quantum vibrations and all sorts of weird stuff can happen on a quantum level it seems. That sounds kind of New Age to me so I tend to feel like I am seeing patterns in the data that aren't there in self-discovery, like how we have a sensory organ in pur heads that corresponds to the third eye's position sounds kind of hippieish. But in terms of after life, may be experience is convergent, individuality is the illusion of system, we are a mass of cells which in turn are made from smaller particles, not a singularity so what if all cells in the universe are thus the essence of the self experience. I can consider the individual experience as synchronised, that all particles are experiential and anyway we know experience is built upon physical state and interaction in consciousness physically encodes sensaation. When does "I" become "you" as another person? It seems by the lack of recogition of what is the same part on a relative spatial level. If I split myself into two, which I could do by chopping myself (brain included) equally in half (even though I wish not x3) and for a brief second at least, my sense of self will be in two places in once, only now I cannot communicate with the rest of me, so the other part of my brain can be considered a "you" inside of a "me". What if then we are all the same, which is seems that we damn well are, derivate from a singularity that separated in the big bang that can knit itself together to re-synchronise its experience? Well then, there is no end to experience by death, only the reduction of self perception for an area of matter. The question is, what happens to the actual thread of individual experiencw? Well, we are always changing so never in one time are we equal to the previous experience, and it is that window that differentiates us from the previous framwe of experience. Though, we perceive things as multi faceted experience in space and time. In that case we can use deductive logic or inductive logic but as observers we start to get nowhere it seems. I can, however, assume, personally, that, the sense of what spiritual people call soul is an illusion and fundamentally if I speak as that singularity that started the universe which is experiencing itself, then I am all the cells in my brain, all the cwlls in yours, all the particles that make up the planet and the rest of the universe. Now, that is a scary thought. May be we are subconsciously aware of this, and the reason why we have empathies and such is to serve as a barrier to protect our other cells that make up my/your/our univereal eperience from being a dissatisfactory one. May be selfishism is just isolation and selflessness by selfish experience motivations isn't and is selfishness at the same time, being if everything is ultimately a whole (which is what the word universe means, after all) then it doesn't matter. That would be the foundation of the subjectivity and objectivity contrast, as you cannot have objectivity with subjects to cover, and you cannot have subjectivity without objective reality. Then everything sits in the same actuality, even alternate senses of reality and then the only subjectivity (particle, experience) is a perceptive phenomenom, a point of place, an angle on and within the whole. As an aside, as for what happens to the projection of the individual thread of experience, may be it is kind of like a bubble of reality within actuality, a quantum experience that can collapse. Then if experience is like a bubble, what happens to said bubbles? Well, inductively, we could say, that bubbles that pop reappear as smaller bubbles elsewhere and grow into bigger bubbles where they can connect together as the same experiential essence which is pretty much what life looks like, smaller bubbles (say, cells) merging to create bigger ones. That is very interesting, indeed, perhaps then we just continue as our fragments of particles. And then for a while we split into a multitude of parts. But then we have a problem, what if those smaller bubbles go in one direction and build a bigger bubble of incarnation elsewhere? May be as said before, we just become two selves and there's like a paralell universe like self difference by experience. May be the biggest bubble to become self conscious enough first dominates as a resolution as your sense of consciousness. Or may be the bubble pops at biological death, but then we are still reacting on a fragmented level. There are so many theories and the reality may even vary from case to case, I don't know. Continuation seems logical, energy has to go somewhere and energy is the foundation of experience. Though note this, I said you could temporarily split an organism even if it be fatal in the long run (well beside the organisms who can split near enough all the time), though as you think everyday you are rarely one active at once in the flow of thought and the brain may temporarily lpse significant activity, neurons may die and data of the self may resolve elsewhere. So we are constantly split and alive. I see two logical explanations only here, already outruling the fact we are (or at least I am) not philosophical zombies, that a) individuality is an illusion we simply cannot grasp for a period of time long enough due to the gap of connections that pass the realisations and observer problems are existent even in quantum mechanics on a fundamental level, or b) the mechanics of life experience exceeds physics and is only a converging dimension to the physical, so to speak. Though, (b) does not imply in a magcal realm of unicorns and winged angelic beings etc, I should say that is a intuitive experience of the mind, yet psychedelic phenomena would be closer to the physical quantum and experiential barrier, where patterns of experience seem logical yet surpass sensory significance.

Before marijuana was made illegal, the American Medical Association's opposition to prohibition was ignored, as was an earlier report on marijuana in India by the British government, which did not find marijuana to be particularly addictive or dangerous. That "Indian Hemp Drugs Committee"report had concluded way back in 1894 that, "The moderate use of hemp drugs is practically attended by no evil results at all."