fanbun

At the time the type of motion capture they used for the concert was new technology they got their hands on, and it ended up being bought by Apple apparently.

Broooo I can see the vision. It’s simplistic right now but they can build off this.

The current laws being enforced on the UK public is not to protect children & teenagers, it’s a blatant scheme disguised to fear-monger, isolate & control the country’s population. I don’t care if I’m sounding like a crazy conspiracy theorist, the idea that people can no longer have privacy if they want to access the bare minimum online is absolutely bizarre and dystopian.

If you’re against these acts by our government and want to fight against unlawful forms of censorship, there’s a few things you can do; (will be updated as time passes — click on og post)

Support organisations such as Open Rights Group & Big Brother Watch

Sign petitions against Digital ID & The Online Safety Act

Contact & complain to your local MPs about your concerns around these new laws being put in place.

Attend any protests or rallies in your area if possible

Don’t give up, keep posting & sharing anything you can!

The U.K. doesn’t care about you or kids. It’s an authoritarian reign by the government to have the public under their dirty, oppressive, pro-genocidal hands.

UPDATES:

VPNs no longer work for iphones with newer ios updates due to the update device locking your phone as the block happens before any traffic leaves your phone which makes VPNs useless.

Google & Apple have until september to enforce their users into this new law which allows AI to scan their private photos / etc for nudity or anything deemed mature.

Bluesky was just added to the list of banned socials media sites and joins the following bans announced already — youtube, reddit, x, facebook, threads, twitch, kick, instagram & tiktok

New petition to sign against banning under 16’s from socials

Technology Secretary Liz Kendall has announced that next month (JULY) there will be more news on further restrictions as well as restrictions on VPNs.

Steam is no longer allowing 18+ games to be bought or shown unless you confirm your age by uploading ID.

This post talks about a new DM feature in youtube. What it fails to mention is that as part of this new feature is that when you send someone a link to a video, and they open it in the youtube app, they will see who sent them the link. Specifically, your channel name.

If your google account name is your real name, so is your channel name by default.

This means the new default behavior is that everyone you send a youtube link to will see your full name if they open it in the mobile app.

To turn this off:

Go to your youtube app settings

Go to Privacy

Turn off "Channel visibility for shared links"

2) any vegetable is better than no vegetable

source

According to the user, they tried to verify their age to get into the PlayStation network

Which failed 10 times, costumer support was contacted

The support said

"Due to past security concerns, Yoti automatically flags multiple verification attempts and any devices running GrapheneOS. These instances are automatically reported to both the authorities and our security team."

Translation: "Due to past security concerns, Yoti automatically flags multiple verification attempts as well as any device running GrapheneOS. These cases are automatically reported to the authorities as well as to our security team."

“The user had provided their real identity documents. They hadn't bypassed anything. It's Yoti's system that appears to have failed to process them.”

Why?

“GrapheneOS restricts camera and biometric APIs. A scan that works on stock Android can fail in a loop on GrapheneOS. The repeated failure isn't fraud. It's a technical incompatibility.”

The OS isn’t banned

“It's a hardened open-source Android OS, used by journalists, lawyers, security researchers, and people like you and me who care about their security.”

“But for Yoti, using it is enough to classify you as a suspect. On what grounds?

Either Yoti actually reports someone, somewhere, for using a legal OS. Or it's boilerplate language designed to scare.

In either case, it's a problem.”

“If it's real: no text requires an age verification provider to report to law enforcement a user detected on GrapheneOS. It's a unilateral policy with no identifiable legal basis.

If it's a bluff: threatening a user with a fictional legal procedure is an unfair business practice in most jurisdictions.”

This reveals that people using alternative OS are going to be treated as suspicious

“At every step, we'll be told it's for security, for the children, for fighting fraud, for compliance. But in the end, the result will be the same: the user seeking to protect themselves will have to justify it, while the fully trackable user will be considered normal.”

“If Yoti confirms this practice, we will need to ask on what legal basis this reporting rests, which authorities are the recipients, what data is transmitted, how many users are affected, how long this information is retained, and what remedies are offered to falsely reported individuals.