Untitled

She’s a patron saint of rape and abuse victims

She took a vow a chastity

A low born guy demanded her to be with him and she turned him down

For this she was imprisoned and tortured. This is how she lost her breasts (details not required)

She was repeatedly raped.

The Catholic Church regards her as a virgin for her peity despite the rape. (No matter your views on virginity this is a pretty interesting statement)

She was sentenced to death to burn at the stake but was saved by an earthquake

In her holiday people make titty cupcakes

I will stop using the terms AFAB and AMAB unless it has to do with male/female people with DSDs because I have noticed that we have co-opted these terms in the gender discourse, and we have totally forgotten that these terms are sex-specific. AFAB is a term used to describe MALE people whose sex was wrongly observed at birth. It is not a FEMALE exclusive term, female people are not AFAB. We are not Intersex/have DSDs; we, like other TRA, should stop co-opting DSD-specific language. It is really mudding the waters.

Either the Olympics is male and female or male and female (female and male DSDs). This essentially means that the female category is mixed sex forever; if it is the latter you want, you need to state that clearly. It is not to say that all male people with DSDs should not be treated with some level of accommodation; it is just saying that in this ONE facet of life, you can eat your cake and have it. It is sad, but being in the Olympics or a professional athlete is a privilege, not a human right. And all the women screaming that these male people with DSDs have female socialisation, if there is one thing 'women' (the social role, I mean) are good at doing is compromising. This, I think, is a fair compromise.

All our anger should be directed at the IOC and demanding them to bring back DNA tests to keep women's sports XX (female), not at radfems or at Imane or Lu-Ting. All of this 'he said' (IBA) and 'she said' (IOC) nonsense could have been avoided if institutions were not hell-bent on gaslighting women into thinking we don't exist as a sex class. Please read the post by @quinntheestallion on crazy-making. It explains this phenomenon very well. Women are responding to this angrily because, for the last decade, institutions have been making it their objective to gaslight women that we don't exist as a sex class. Also, if you see women's reactions and start getting angry at GC or Radfems for being upset or for 'not being nuanced enough or neutral' or whatever you want to say from your high horse, then you are siding with these abusive institutions that are psychologically abusing women. It's really hard to be 'rational' (not angry or erratic) when confronting an abuser.

I've said repeatedly that making women explain basic facts of their corporeal reality over and over again was a distinct form of psychological terrorism. Make no mistake, after being a victimized on the basis of sex for thousands of years, having to explain from scratch what sex is and why it's important is a potent act of dominance and psychological abuse being inflicted on women. For this reason, people engaging in these debates need to extra take care of their mental and emotional health.

If women were respected and sporting bodies could be trusted to ensure fairness, the IOC would already have tests and structures in place to differentiate between DSD males and females and would have aptly identified which disorders don't negate male advantage and put things in place to address those issues.

But the entire concept of "male advantage" itself is considered a non-issue by transfeminists. Reality denial and gaslighting has been a feature of this issue since day one. The outrageous idea that only T levels matter (of which, natal males in women's sport are allowed a minimum Tlevel far above what natal females are allowed) is part of that gaslighting.

It’s the first time I’m seeing more of the general public reacting with “You don’t know what you’re talking about. Stop being so weird and obsessive.”

Reaction to this has been particularly strong in Taiwan.

‘Gender Critics’ aren’t even being gender critical now. They are being gender enforcers for women they perceive to be outside the norm.

Female athletes have to compete with intersex males, intersex females, transmen, transwomen and their fellow normative biological female athletes. All the while male athletes just.....go about their business uninterrupted?

This is not progressive. This is a reinforcement of the status quo.

And the response to reports of the president of the IBA saying Khelif was disqualified for being XY is to discredit the entire organization as "corrupt" but they aren't actually explicitly stating his statement on Khelif being XY was inaccurate? Unclear on if what's actually being called "corrupt": did the president of the IBA lie about their sex because he wanted to disqualify them to fix the competition? Or is the corruption in question in the form of "challenging someone's gender/sex"? Considering TRA views on single sex sports, it could very well be the later.

I'm just saying-to the radfems who accept this, you do realize there's currently an entire generation of males and who are being raised "as female" and, thanks to laws obliterating women's legal identities, are going to have the word "female" on all official documents, right?

Also who cares what they do with their bodies it’s their body

If you go against his views or give him back the same hate, he will accuse you of being nazi and committing genocide. I attached few of his post but you will find more graphic and evil things by going though his page. He wants to waste your time and drain your energy, he doesn’t want actual debate like many of his kind

Also who cares what they do with their bodies it’s their body

TRAs genuinely believe that the concepts of masculinity and femininity are traits that are just attached to words. These words are empty vessels that THEY attach meaning to. They aren't defining a word; they are describing THEMSELVES. So when you ask a Trans person, "What are masculinity and femininity?" to them the question is received as "Describe who you are? or Describe yourself?" Thus, why, gender is something that is/can mean anything to anybody.

They have no structural conceptualisation of gender because, to them, gender is not a tool or even an ideology. It is the self. So when radfems say "woman is not a gender" or "women are adult human females," they cannot conceptualise or even grasp this because, to them, gender is the self. How can women be with the 'self'?

TRAs genuinely believe that the concepts of masculinity and femininity are traits that are just attached to words. These words are empty vessels that THEY attach meaning to. They aren't defining a word; they are describing THEMSELVES. So when you ask a Trans person, "What are masculinity and femininity?" to them the question is received as "Describe who you are? or Describe yourself?" Thus, why, gender is something that is/can mean anything to anybody.

They have no structural conceptualisation of gender because, to them, gender is not a tool or even an ideology. It is the self. So when radfems say "woman is not a gender" or "women are adult human females," they cannot conceptualise or even grasp this because, to them, gender is the self. How can women be with the 'self'?