the whole "what job are you gonna get with a gender studies degree, barista?" argument is a really interesting microcosm of utilitarian philosophy and its influence on the education system. Under an optimal utilitarian capitalist framework, every expenditure of effort is an investment for which we should reap returns and any allocation for non-monetary interests is misplaced. Effectively, "There is nothing worth having that doesn't generate money and therefore create value." Art degrees are viewed as frivolous and delegitimized within this outlook because if college is a monetary "investment" and the only "profit" generated or created through this is intangible knowledge that you use to create non-monetary public works which anyone can access for free, or informational or scholarly work published for the publics benefit, well lets just say you aren't paying off the monetary investment, because you can't pay it off with knowledge or art. This is why college is framed as "take on debt, make an investment in your future salary." Throughout grade school students are encouraged to learn and explore and be creative, then college pulls the rug out from under you, declaring "welcome to the world kid your efforts don't matter if they don't pay rent and cover your cost of living." Banks wait for the students still carrying their momentum of creativity and outside of the box thinking so carefully instilled within them, and they offer large loans, aware that overly eager and uneducated students excited to explore their passions, will have not yet realized the world doesn't see their interests as economically viable, and actively sees them as a fool for falling for it. Debt is an investment, a deposit in the student, which they must then pay off by conforming to profit generation and neglecting the non-monetary. K-12 create students with dreams, then college and loans either drain their interests for interest or crush the same dreams they encouraged and led them to develop. This is an economic system functioning as intended to encourage passive monetary generation for the wealthy and punish the scholarly and artistic through a framework of utilitarian optimization. Through which money is seen as valuable, while intangible intellectual and insightful art are seen as insignificant, and instead money making positions are seen as "real jobs." Legitimized by their tangible profits in stark contrast to the theoretical ideological profit of research or art. This happens because money is only a signifier of value, Γ la "the treachery of images." Money looks like "value" and we treat it like value, the wealthiest people are seen as the "most moral, hardest working, bestest boys!" who pulled themselves up by their bootstraps to usher in wealth for us all! While the people who work hard to study, research, and make beautiful art for the public for free are delegitimized. Unless youre the woke black sheep in your family, this is a framework a significant amount of people still subscribe to. So no, your parents arent gonna let you go to college for gender studies. It's not a good investment, sorry kiddo, welcome to the "real world" hope you can find a "real job" wherein real means, remains complacent in the system responsible for this and generates profit for the wealthy, because if it doesn't, is it even real?