Ethics and Morality in art
Ethics and morals within the art world have been disputed for a long period of time, however, there are still no codes or guidelines for ethics within art. This is because some people believe that there is no such thing as “unethical” art. Having no rigid guidelines allows art to challenge belief systems and be boundary- pushing. On- the- other hand it allows artists to create work that is seen to be offensive, such as “Myra” by Marcus Harvey. Harvey re-created the iconic police photograph of Myra Hindley out of the hand prints of the children who were murdered by her and her husband. The Royal Academy, where the piece was shown, was called out for the “sick exploitation of dead children” by the charity “Kidscape” and the painting was vandalised twice. This is because the work disregarded the pain and trauma that the families of the children were going through, and seemingly glorified Myra Hindley by hanging her picture in a prestigious gallery. However, Sir Norman Rosenthal argued that “Harveys Painting was the single most important work of the sensation exhibition”. This controversial piece has sparked a debate on ethics and whether art should have ethical codes to follow.
I believe that ethics should have a place within the art world. I believe that the viewer should be able to “actively engage with the art as they do with the world they live in” therefore, artworks need to follow the ethical codes that the world follows, as the artwork is not separate to the history of the world. However, I can see that ethics could be viewed as “censorship” as art is extremely subjective and down to the individual person to interpret. In addition, challenging your belief systems is a very powerful form of art. The artist, however, has to take responsibility for the consequences that the artwork may produce, since the viewer may not understand the artists intentions, therefore, it is the artists role to make their intentions known.
Not only do artists need to look at the effect that their artwork will have on the viewer, they also need to look at the idea of appropriation. A core part of art includes imitation and copying of artistic styles to learn and improve as an artist. Therefore, the concept originality and context is also at the heart of this debate.
Banksy re-worked Monet's most famous painting “Water Lilies”. On the surface this could be seen as appropriation as he used an almost identical composition, however, the context of the piece is vastly different to Monet's. Banksy used Monet's fame to make a statement: that the consumerist society is contributing to environmental destruction. Therefore, is it appropriation if the context and intention of the piece is vastly different? I believe that in Banksy's case, everyone understood that he was playing with Monet's idyllic painting, so credit had already been given to Monet. However, I believe that if artists utilise artwork from a more “underground” artist, then credit should also be given to them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myra_(painting)
https://www.fulcrum-anglican.org.uk/articles/should-art-by-ethical-by-elizabeth-adekunle/
https://www.myartbroker.com/artist/banksy/spotlight-on-banksys-show-me-the-monet/
Censoring provocative art is the worst advert for 2012 | Art | The Guardian